![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ron Garret wrote: Absolutely not. Whatever gave you that idea? hmmm, I think I lost track of who was saying that there is absolutely no point for a space station. There is a big difference between *a* space station and *the* space station. There may well be a point to having *a* space station, but *the* space station is nothing more than a colossal money sink. ah. Looking back in the thread, at one point "the" ISS is discussed, but I responded to the paragraph about "a" space station. -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Noel wrote:
I guess that depends on your vision. Do you really think we should stay on this earth? Do you really lack the vision to see humans in space? Bob, I think humans ought to spread out. But I also think that unmanned missions might get us to the emigration point sooner. Seems to me that if we can send, say, ten unmanned missions to Mars for the cost of one manned mission, and it takes, say, twenty missions (manned or unmanned) to get us enough info to set up a colony, then unmanned exploration will get us the colony sooner. Plug in Arcturus for Mars, and I think it still works. I also have a fear of the sort of stagnation that set in after we got to the moon. Politically, we seem to be able to convince Congress to keep funding unmanned missions. After we reached the moon, Congress pretty much shut down funding for manned missions. I expect that if we sent a team to Mars (the next logical step), we might get a second mission there, but we wouldn't see a third one for 100 years. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article bvZ1f.471$C62.222@trndny05,
George Patterson wrote: I guess that depends on your vision. Do you really think we should stay on this earth? Do you really lack the vision to see humans in space? Bob, I think humans ought to spread out. But I also think that unmanned missions might get us to the emigration point sooner. Agreed. Please don't think that I think that manned missions should always take priority of unmanned. Both manned and unmanned missions can have important contributions to exploration of space and the eventual move off this earth. -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
NASA chokes again | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | May 2nd 05 01:43 AM |
Boeing: Space shuttles to last into next decade | JohnMcGrew | Piloting | 17 | October 24th 03 09:31 PM |
NASA B-57 pair to film shuttle launches | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 10 | October 10th 03 08:05 PM |
Cause of Columbia Shuttle Disaster. | Mike Spera | Owning | 2 | August 31st 03 03:11 PM |