![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you don't like the glider or the selling team/Agent..
buy something else! use your time gliding..not moaning I'm sure some other manufacturer will be happy to relive of some Euro At 19:48 13 October 2005, wrote: I believe it is more reasonable not to allow somebody to fly it then face all the possible tragic consequences of an accident. Therefore saying 'no' at the last moment was not a matter of trying to humiliate Mr. Sharma by any means as he claims - but protecting both, the person and the glider. It's also worth mentioning that our decision was confirmed by the local gliding instructor who shared our doubts. Mr Sharma said to me personally that he had only 200 hours and no experience on racing class gliders. We need some facts... 1) Was this decision based on Mr Sharma's previous flying experience or on the results of his checkride ? 2) Is it true that by the time he landed the glider was already being disassembled ? Bartek |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Glider Factfinder" wrote in message ... If you don't like the glider or the selling team/Agent.. buy something else! use your time gliding..not moaning I'm sure some other manufacturer will be happy to relive of some Euro That is not the point. It is not even the fact he did not fly the machine, the man has been humiliated. A bit of empathy may be in order if nothing else. Only now do people have some recourse. Long live RAS. Udo |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Naresh has provided all the information they asked for, proving his
experience. He also got his licence recognized and was provided with a polish licence to fly. If the intention was to show himthe glider without allowing him to fly, they should have clearly told him before his trip. The last-minute request for a checkflight is also an excuse, since the glider was being put away while he was up in the air. This is ridiculous communication. They have the right to decide who can fly the prototype, and very likely only allow the people they personally know to be very skilled, like you would normally do to allow someone to fly your very precious glider... however, it's only fair to explain the reason for not allowing him to fly, and do it in a way that is not humiliating. I believe that in business, the way you behave tells a lot on the reliability of a person and of a company. They behaved in a way that doesn't allow trust relationships to develop. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 28th 04 12:49 AM |
| PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 01:14 PM |
| 12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 13th 03 12:01 AM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |