![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven P. McNicoll wrote: Primary navigation (the VFR GPS) is no longer reliable, the aircraft is IMC, and the pilot is unaware that the unit is no longer reliable. Those are not properties of a problem? I don't think so. If the aircraft drifts off course the controller will nudge it back and the pilot will then be aware that the unit is no longer reliable. No problem. The controller's attention might be elsewhere (have you never been sent right through a localizer?). That said, my Garmin 196 does warn me when it loses reliable reception, though it's not proper RAIM. All the best, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... The controller's attention might be elsewhere (have you never been sent right through a localizer?). There's no similarity. There's a window of a few seconds for the turn to intercept the localizer. It would take at least several minutes for the controller to notice an enroute aircraft drifting off course unless the GPS was erroneously calling for a significant turn. If it did that the pilot should notice the error before the controller. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The controller's attention might be elsewhere (have you never been sent right through a localizer?). That said, my Garmin 196 does warn me when it loses reliable reception, though it's not proper RAIM. Reliable reception is not equivalent to integrity. You can have great reception and one bad signal that drives your position off hundreds of miles. And yes it is rare (10E-5/hour). BUt aviation integrity is at the 10E-7 rate. Ron Lee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|