A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 19th 05, 09:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wrote:

by Skywise into@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dec 14, 2005 at 11:01 PM


"Skylune" live-ski-or-die@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in

news:41fa639112b9db427c25872b82d6d0ba@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I need to pull out the handy John Adams quote again: "Facts are

stubborn
things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the

dictates
of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."


Pot - kettle - black.

Brian

Name a single example of factual misstatement. One.



It is misstatement by implication. Saying that you can be killed if a
plane falls on you is a fact. Using that fact to say that airplanes
represent a public hazard is a misstatement by implication.

The same "logic" is used to excuse the Draconian measures taken around
the DC area.

--
Remve "_" from email to reply to me personally.
  #2  
Old December 19th 05, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

by Orval Fairbairn o_r_fairbairn@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dec 19, 2005 at
09:28 PM




Name a single example of factual misstatement. One.



It is misstatement by implication. Saying that you can be killed if a
plane falls on you is a fact. Using that fact to say that airplanes
represent a public hazard is a misstatement by implication.

The same "logic" is used to excuse the Draconian measures taken around
the DC area.

OK, but who ever said an airplane is a public safety hazard? Certainly
not me. Ever.

Certain pilots create a nuisance, but that is clearly not the same thing.






  #3  
Old December 15th 05, 02:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

On 2005-12-14, Skylune wrote:
I also "suspect" this could have been done with MS Flight Sim. But, that
is not what really happened. Fact: The terrorists trained at GA schools.


A fact, but it's totally irrelevant. Given most of the terrorists didn't
have any kind of criminal record and at the time were in the United
States perfectly legally, there is no way you could have denied them
training unless you imposed a rule 'brown skinned people and foreigners
are not to be trained'. Even with today's TSA rules, these people would
have been approved for training.

--
Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
  #4  
Old December 14th 05, 08:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

wrote:

Come on, Sky-buffoon... Who could have ever imagined airliners being
used in such an insidious and evil way before 9/11?


Didn't one of those "Jack Ryan" novels have an airliner deliberately crashed
into Congress?

- Andrew

  #5  
Old December 14th 05, 09:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Didn't the Kamikaze pilots crash into ships during WWII?


"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com...
| wrote:
|
| Come on, Sky-buffoon... Who could have ever imagined
airliners being
| used in such an insidious and evil way before 9/11?
|
| Didn't one of those "Jack Ryan" novels have an airliner
deliberately crashed
| into Congress?
|
| - Andrew
|


  #6  
Old December 14th 05, 10:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:22:39 -0500, Andrew Gideon
wrote:

wrote:

Come on, Sky-buffoon... Who could have ever imagined airliners being
used in such an insidious and evil way before 9/11?


Didn't one of those "Jack Ryan" novels have an airliner deliberately crashed
into Congress?


"Debt of Honor" (paperback was published June 1994, I can't seem to
find the publish date for the hardcover offhand, but was likely late
93/early 94).
  #7  
Old December 15th 05, 03:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Peter Clark wrote:

"Debt of Honor" (paperback was published June 1994, I can't seem to
find the publish date for the hardcover offhand, but was likely late
93/early 94).


Amazon is reporting the hard-cover publishing date as August 17, 1994.


--
Peter
  #8  
Old December 14th 05, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com...
wrote:

Come on, Sky-buffoon... Who could have ever imagined airliners being
used in such an insidious and evil way before 9/11?


Didn't one of those "Jack Ryan" novels have an airliner deliberately
crashed
into Congress?

- Andrew


Yep in Debt of Honor by a senior Japan Air pilot.


  #10  
Old December 15th 05, 03:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

The most notable attempt was a FedEx DC-10 in 1994,
where a disgruntled worker who was going to be fired attempted to kill
all three crew members and crash the plane into FedEx headquarters

IIRC that was motivated not by any overt act of terrorism but by the
wacko's plan that his kids would collect on his life insurance policy
if he died in a company acft. Of course, this wouldn't matter to the
people on the ground where the plane came down..

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training dancingstar Piloting 3 October 5th 04 02:17 AM
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe Naval Aviation 5 August 21st 04 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.