![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: Eunometic schrieb: It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight, if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to get out of that thing... I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW? The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eunometic schrieb:
The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? Because besides power for certain important instruments and the radio the EPS battery also powers an electric motor that powers a hydraulic pump. "Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight). When in so-called "mech mode" the stick is connected to several hydraulic valves that control the hydraulic actuators. So you need hydraulics pressure, and in cases of double engine out this hydraulic pressure comes from an electric pump that powered by the EPS battery. In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the corresponding actuators. The mechanical linkage is inactive (in emergencies the stick gets linked to the mechanical controls through a honeycomb block which gets squeezed by the stick movement applied by the panicing pilot ;-) This applies to the GR versions (bomber), I don't know if the F versions are somewhat different. Benjamin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? Because besides power for certain important instruments and the radio the EPS battery also powers an electric motor that powers a hydraulic pump. "Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight). Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with limited movement). Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all. An additional layer of redundancy and an 'analog' backup would be better use of the weight. Perhaps Panavia was worried about Electromagnetic Pulse or Weapons. I believe F-16 uses fiber optics. When in so-called "mech mode" the stick is connected to several hydraulic valves that control the hydraulic actuators. So you need hydraulics pressure, and in cases of double engine out this hydraulic pressure comes from an electric pump that powered by the EPS battery. In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the corresponding actuators. They use potentiometers? I though LVDT were normally used. The mechanical linkage is inactive (in emergencies the stick gets linked to the mechanical controls through a honeycomb block which gets squeezed by the stick movement applied by the panicing pilot ;-) This applies to the GR versions (bomber), I don't know if the F versions are somewhat different. Benjamin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eunometic schrieb:
"Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight). Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with limited movement). correct. Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all. The mechanical linkage backup is there if the 2x redundant fly-by-wire system fails or gets damaged. When in "mech mode" (FBW dead but engines are running) the aircraft is fully controllable (but of course reacts more sensible due to the lack of CSAS and also lacks things like spin prevention and AOA limiter etc). Loosing the FBW does not mean the aircraft can't return safely... An additional layer of redundancy and an 'analog' backup would be better use of the weight. Perhaps Panavia was worried about Electromagnetic Pulse or Weapons. Correct. Thanks to the mechanical linkage the aircraft is still operable even when suffering from an EMP or with a damaged electronics system. Even 4x redundant FBW wouldn't provide this safety, and the weight penalty isn't really big. I believe F-16 uses fiber optics. The Eurofighter Typhoon uses fiber optics. The F-16 used a wire harness (don't know if that has been changed in a later block but I doubt that). In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the corresponding actuators. They use potentiometers? I though LVDT were normally used. No, it's some sort of potentiometer, but of course a bit more sophisticated than what you can find in consumer electronics ;-) Benjamin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eunometic" wrote in message oups.com... Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: Eunometic schrieb: It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight, if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to get out of that thing... I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW? The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? The One Shot Battery is there to provide electrical power to a Fuel pump (or in combination with a Hyd pump). The engines also need electrical power to keep their systems running - without electrics, the engines will "run away" - Very bad thing if you're not near a nice big bit of tarmac...... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian wrote:
"Eunometic" wrote in message oups.com... Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: Eunometic schrieb: It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight, if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to get out of that thing... I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW? The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? The One Shot Battery is there to provide electrical power to a Fuel pump (or in combination with a Hyd pump). The engines also need electrical power to keep their systems running - without electrics, the engines will "run away" - Very bad thing if you're not near a nice big bit of tarmac...... Or, more importantly, a runway. They tend to be made of concrete not asphalt. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: Eunometic schrieb: It does apply for the PA200 Tornado. The APU is not operable in-flight, if you loose both engines and the one-shot battery is down you have to get out of that thing... I didn't think Tornado was fully FBW? The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 11:05 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |