![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jfp wrote:
also if you pass the terminal exit point i believe it would be a push back, (very expensive) as no more exit points exist Notwithstanding that any jet can go backwards with the use of the reversers, why a push-back beyond the exit point - isn't the apron there wide enough to accommodate a 180-degree turn? Ramapriya |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's never wise with low engines. The book may even have a minimum
forward speed for reversers. Ramapriya wrote: jfp wrote: also if you pass the terminal exit point i believe it would be a push back, (very expensive) as no more exit points exist Notwithstanding that any jet can go backwards with the use of the reversers, why a push-back beyond the exit point - isn't the apron there wide enough to accommodate a 180-degree turn? Ramapriya |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jfp" wrote in message
Hi a recent landing at Antigua in a 777 was very hard, and the pilot applied the brakes really heavily, probaly in my assumption, because of the short runway and a slight overshoot of touch down point, also if you pass the terminal exit point i believe it would be a push back, (very expensive) as no more exit points exist, my point is does a very heavy landing strain the 777 aircraft unduly especially the undercarriage If you are referring to VC Byrd, you are wrong. It is plenty long enough and does have a turning point at the end. As for the undercarriage, it will survive very hard landings. One of my buds has recorded in excess of 2 g's with the only damage being to his ego. The monocoque fuselage will buckle first. Search the web and you'll come across some pictures of a B-767 in the Dominican Republic 2 years ago exhibiting such damage. D. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jfp wrote:
Hi a recent landing at Antigua in a 777 was very hard, and the pilot applied the brakes really heavily, probaly in my assumption, because of the short runway and a slight overshoot of touch down point, also if you pass the terminal exit point i believe it would be a push back, (very expensive) as no more exit points exist, my point is does a very heavy landing strain the 777 aircraft unduly especially the undercarriage regards Frank If you can find a copy of the TV documentary 21st Century Jet on the building and certification of the 777, you'll see that it's designed to take much more severe braking than what you witnessed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
I watched the same. As I recall, the heavy braking test also resulted in some wheel fires. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |