![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
What's the point in being angry? Stupid or careless people kill their families every day. How is this any different, for example, from this highway accident: I see your point, but to me every preventable (no, not the sit on your couch or fly comparison here - I mean poor decision making) GA airplane accident that kills especially children is yet another black mark against "those small planes." You discuss a logical response but the non-flying masses, those who read the newspapers and watch their favorite talking heads, will most certainly respond with emotion. -- Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote I see your point, but to me every preventable (no, not the sit on your couch or fly comparison here - I mean poor decision making) GA airplane accident that kills especially children is yet another black mark against "those small planes." So what if it was a mechanical problem, with an airplane that was well maintained, well equipped, with a pilot that was well qualified to fly in weather like the crash weather? What is the response then? Who is there to get angry at, or to react towards? -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: Save the anger for things that matter (like politicians who break the law, lie about it until they are exposed, and then claim that they don't have to obey the law). Give it a rest. Clinton has been out of office for years, now. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cjcampbell" wrote in message oups.com... Peter Duniho wrote: Save the anger for things that matter (like politicians who break the law, lie about it until they are exposed, and then claim that they don't have to obey the law). Give it a rest. Clinton has been out of office for years, now. Yea but the other Clinton is still on the prowl. God help us. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Angry that pilots sometimes devolve into emotional civilians who think
SE planes are intrinsicly dangerous and can't believe anyone would actually fly one of those machines at night or in the clouds. Maybe Hilton needs to stick with riding in the back of 737s. -Robert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave j wrote:
Angry, I think because it is so senseless and needless. It's upseting to see people killing their families in stupid ways. I don't know what it is about the hills around gilroy, but they seem to be magnets for airplanes. A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley). On the other hand, I might disagree with Hilton about whether the time and type/age of the AC made for unacceptable risk factors for family flying in and of themselves. If the pilot was skilled for IMC and the plane was properly equipped and maintained, I don't have a problem with it. The database lists the owner with no IFR rating, only ASEL. Disclaimer: Might not have been the owner flying, might have got his IR recently, etc etc etc. There is, of course, the old single-engine-night-imc worry of engine failure, but I'd bet $0.50 that this plane augured in with cruise power. (that's purely speculation, of course, but I'd bet $0.50) Reports of 'aerobatics' probably imply a spin, which in turn probably implies disorientation, which probably implies a stupid VFR into IMC flight at night. Obviously, yes, we'll have to wait for the final report, but unfortunately with most accidents, just the names and faces change. Hilton |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar
conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along ? Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley). Were they on an IFR clearance? Was this recent accident on an IFR clearance? Sounds like you have more information about this situation than the rest of us. -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along ? Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley). Were they on an IFR clearance? Couldn't be on one at 500'. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in similar conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along ? Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the valley). Were they on an IFR clearance? No, but were instrument rated and it was a Commander. It may have been a legality issue (currency etc) that cause them to go VFR, I don't know. Was this recent accident on an IFR clearance? FAA records show that the pilot did not have an instrument rating - now those records are a little old, so he may have. Prelim FAA data show that the pilot did get a weather briefing, but it does not show him on an IFR flight plan. (Again, this data is often wrong). Sounds like you have more information about this situation than the rest of us. I followed the accident pretty closely. I was watching the weather conditions the whole week. San Jose was completely 'socked in' for days - Sacramento/Modesto etc area was clear though so I'm sure that was tempting. I watched the radar plot immediately afterwards and they stayed really low, followed Hwy 101 and then took a left at the reservoir. It was a typical scud run for about 20 minutes or so. I saw the accident area several times, it is right on the RHV to Harris Ranch run. The CFI made numerous claims including that he wasn't monitoring the altitude, that the plane was on fire prior to the accident, and that he was just a passenger and not the CFI at the time. The NTSB (correctly IMHO) rejected those claims. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?...03FA187&rpt=fi Hilton |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aircraft Spruce: Abused Customers and Fourteen More Angry Comments -- More to Come | jls | Home Built | 2 | February 6th 05 08:32 AM |
If true, this makes me really angry (Buzzing Pilot kills 9 year-old son) | Hilton | Piloting | 2 | November 29th 04 05:02 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
JEWS AND THE WHITE SLAVE TRADE | B2431 | Military Aviation | 16 | March 1st 04 11:04 PM |
Enemies Of Everyone | Grantland | Military Aviation | 5 | September 16th 03 12:55 PM |