![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Theune" wrote in message news:q6txf.10798 ..... Also the flight departed around 1300 and ended at 1720 which is 4:20 by my math. ( I know you did not supply the 5:20 number ) The report specified that the flight ended at 1720 PST, which was local time, so I am presuming that when they referenced the take off time as 1300 they used local time for that also. The departure point was ABQ, which is in MST. If that's the case, he would have been in the air for 5:20. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least in most Mooneys 550nm is a pretty short trip. I can easily
make Albuquerque from Sacramento in my Mooney and that is over 800 nm. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So he flight planned a trip of some 550 nm without a fuel stop. I don't
know diddly about Mooneys, but iirc, 550 nm is pushing it pretty hard in most singles, yes? Trainers, yes. IFR cruisers, no. A Mooney is generally good for a little over 5 hours endurance at 75% power, and you can expect to make 140-150 kts. If you pull it back to 60-65% and lean it, you can get 6+ hours at 130+ kts. 550 nm is easily doable unless the headwinds are vicious. He said he had 49 gallons leaving ABQ, and flew about 5:20. 9.2 gph. Is that about right for a Mooney? Depends what power setting he was running. Many people run their Mooneys around 8 gph for endurance. That would make sense given the length of the trip, since making an extra fuel stop would erase any time savings from going faster. Before we jump all over this guy and make snide comments about too much air in the tanks, I seem to recall not too long ago we had a pilot run out of gas - only it turned out later than when his carburetor was rebuilt, most of the parts used were for the wrong model or out of tolerance, and the fuel leaked away. The NTSB still called it pilot error. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
The NTSB still called it pilot error. And they're right. Coming back from Oshkosh last time, my left fuel gauge stayed on full. I did not assume that something was wrong with the gauge and that I had plenty of gas. Turned out that some little insect had plugged the vents at my last fuel stop and it was pulling from the right tank only, even when the left tank was selected. When the gauges get close to empty, land. Especially if they shouldn't be getting close to empty. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote Before we jump all over this guy and make snide comments about too much air in the tanks, I seem to recall not too long ago we had a pilot run out of gas - only it turned out later than when his carburetor was rebuilt, most of the parts used were for the wrong model or out of tolerance, and the fuel leaked away. The NTSB still called it pilot error. True. The facts are not in, yet. We can wait to jump on him, until then. g It does make you wonder if he had fuel gauges that worked. Seeing them both down almost down at the empty line would have made me want to stop, before all the reserve was used up, right? -- Jim in NC |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
"bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Piloting | 88 | December 28th 04 11:04 PM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |