![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure what the manufacturer thinks, but I just got my 19 year old (synthetic)
Pioneer 29" Tri-conical back from its annual inspection and pack. Maybe it is that it has been kept cool and dry, and only opened once a year, but the rigger reports it as good as new. Only sign of degradation is some staining on the outside cover. He is happy to keep on re-packing it as long as the fabric and shrouds pass the strength test. As for airbags, and the usefulness of safety devices. The only injury I have ever sustained in a car, was when I had a bumper bash, and the airbag deployed. Nasty friction burn the full length of my forearm. Still prefer to have one, and I have now learned to drive without crossing my arm across the wheel. Similarly with my parachute. I certainly have no ambition to use it as more than a mildly uncomforable cusion, but I will replace it the moment the rigger expresses reservations. John Galloway wrote: See this link to an article that includes the Strong company's view that there need be no specific limit to the life of a properly maintained and stored Strong canopy: http://www.strongparachutes.com/Pages/Articles.html At 17:18 13 January 2006, Eric Greenwell wrote: wrote: In the USA, there isn't really any life span of canopies set for by the FAA. However, some manufacturers are limiting their life span of canopies, or harness/containers systems. For example, National limits their life span to 15 years, Paraphernalia Softie is doing the same, but Strong Enterprises rigs are good to use as long as they pass the canopy/canopy fabric tests. Do the manufacturers give a reason for this, such as discovering parachutes that are no longer safe after 15 years, or industry tests that shows fabric deteriorates in a manner that can't be found by inspection? Or is this simply a convenient way to limit their liability? Without knowing more, I see no reason to buy anything but a Strong parachute. Why buy a parachute that's worthless (or maybe unsafe) after 15 years? From what you say below, there are many stress factors on a parachute, and the implication is the industry (or at least some of it) doesn't know to test for potential problems. What puzzles me is these packing an usage stresses don't seem very demanding for synthetic fabrics. Sport parachutes get much more handling and use (jumping a parachute seems like far more stress than using it as a cushion!), so it's hard to understand why our chutes should degrade significantly in 15 years. On the other hand, Performance Designs wants to see reserve canopies in their factory after 40 repack cycles. If the canopy passes the tests they will return it back to you and you are good to go. Having said that, me as a rigger, I am not repacking parachutes that are older than 15 years. And in general, if I remember correctly, the PIA (Parachute Industry Association) also agrees that 15 years is the 'life span' of a canopy but I am not quite positive on that. I'll check with them and let you know. The problem with parachutes is not the age alone. There is some other factors playing important role in the fabric degradation. The main factor is the repack cycle. According to the FAA, if your canopy is made of synthetic fibers the repack cycle is 120 days and 60 days in a case on natural fibers but that is history. The main degradation of fabric comes from handling and repacking the canopy. When the rig is due for a repack the canopy is pulled out of container or deployment bag in a case of sport parachute. Then the rigger inspects the whole system, let the canopy dry up and if everything is a OK it goes back into the container or deployment bag. This insertion into the deployment bag or container is the biggest stress for the fabric. And then you fly in it. You sit on it. It works in some cases as a cushion. And after your are done flying, you leave it in the direct sunlight, high temperatures and then when you put your glider away in the trailer the poor rig is being cooked. In some cases people will take them home....well, at list they were attempting that, because the rig rides in a trunk of your car in heat and cold. There is a push from the industry with the FAA to change the repack cycle to 180 days. That will help with multiple issues. I jumped a main sport parachute that sit in a deployment bag for over 2 years. It worked just fine. Still, I believe that a good parachute is worth spending the money and it is worth of having and flying with it. -- Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA -- Bruce Greeff Std Cirrus #57 I'm no-T at the address above. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lifespan of a parachute canopy? | Martyn Johnson | Soaring | 15 | January 18th 06 11:12 PM |
Duo Discus canopy problems | David Starer | Soaring | 4 | June 20th 04 11:09 PM |
Canopy crack repair | Pete Brown | Soaring | 0 | May 18th 04 03:09 AM |
Redundant canopy latching | John | Soaring | 5 | March 16th 04 12:50 PM |
FS: SECURITY 150 PARACHUTE PACK W/O CANOPY | Tim Hanke | Home Built | 0 | July 21st 03 05:59 PM |