![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Peter Dohm" wrote:
At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter Why would an updraft intake system be more resistant to ice? Heat rises, so I would expect a downdraft system, mounted above the engine block, to be more resistant to icing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"who cares?" wrote in message
news:54xBf.560$AV.519@trnddc07... Why would an updraft intake system be more resistant to ice? Heat rises, so I would expect a downdraft system, mounted above the engine block, to be more resistant to icing. "Typically" cooling air comes in above the engine, flows down between the cylinders, then out the bottom. This makes it colder up top, and warmer below. There are, of course, exceptions. -- Geoffrey Thorpe The Sea Hawk At WowWay D0t Com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wowway d0t com wrote:
Why would an updraft intake system be more resistant to ice? Heat rises, so I would expect a downdraft system, mounted above the engine block, to be more resistant to icing. "Typically" cooling air comes in above the engine, flows down between the cylinders, then out the bottom. This makes it colder up top, and warmer below. There are, of course, exceptions. This has been one of the most friendly informative threads yet on this newsgroup, How refreshing! John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:22:45 -0500, "Peter Dohm"
wrote: "Rich S." wrote in message ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message news ![]() ---------much snipped----------- These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" This has been my area of concern as well. I would really find these engines more attractive if I was confident that a complete new engine could be built. New engines don't have crankshaft problems? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Rich S. Yes. I know that they do, and new design engines are notorious; as are design improvements, changes of supplier, etc. And they include plenty of reasons for loss of power not caused by the crankshaft! However, my concerns include, reliability, maintainability, and eventual replacement; and I think you understand my point. At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter By what reasoning? Virtually all carbureted aero engines are sucseptible to carb ice - doesn't matter where the carb is. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
clare at snyder.on.ca wrote in message
... On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:22:45 -0500, "Peter Dohm" wrote: "Rich S." wrote in message ... "Peter Dohm" wrote in message news ![]() These were also 40 year old cranks of unknown provenence, pulled out of old car engines that may have been thrashed to within an inch of their lives in previous "inCARnations" This has been my area of concern as well. I would really find these engines more attractive if I was confident that a complete new engine could be built. New engines don't have crankshaft problems? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Rich S. Yes. I know that they do, and new design engines are notorious; as are design improvements, changes of supplier, etc. And they include plenty of reasons for loss of power not caused by the crankshaft! However, my concerns include, reliability, maintainability, and eventual replacement; and I think you understand my point. At this point, the Jabiru 3300 is the only engine that really looks to me like a promising replacement; and I really don't know its service record. However, albeit at a higher dollar price, its features seem to preserve: 1) similar or lighter weight, 2) similar or higher power, 3) six cylinder smoothness, 4) reasonably slow idle, and 5) similar dimmensions. Additional benefits are designed in dual ignition and an updraft intake system, similar to Lycoming and Continental, which should be more resistant to ice. Peter By what reasoning? Virtually all carbureted aero engines are sucseptible to carb ice - doesn't matter where the carb is. As another poster also pointed out, my memory was faulty and it is easy to form ice in the O-200, even though the carburetor appears to be in the path of heated cooling air from the cylinders. Peter |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Corvair Engine Conversion Breakin Success | Dick | Home Built | 1 | January 11th 04 02:06 PM |
Corvair Conversion | Gig Giacona | Home Built | 17 | October 27th 03 09:43 PM |