![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah wrote:
How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? By making the entire pie larger. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Judah" wrote in message ... How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? Here we have the crux of what passes for liberalism these days. Idiot. The assumption is that if you possess something, it must have been stolen from somebody else. It is astounding that liberals, who claim to be intellectuals, cannot see the blatant fallacy behind this argument. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, CJ, you should go back and follow the thread a little more
closely, and maybe read it without your blinders on. The conservative view presented was that liberals want to take other people's assets and redistribute them. I responded that conservatives want to take other people's assets and keep them for themselves. The response was that conservatives don't want other people's assets, and I disagree with that completely. You read my statement as a bitter one of resentment. Actually, I it was a simple plain fact of the Free Market economy. I made no mention of stealing. The Free Market in the US requires that people redistribute assets in order to get rich. Most people don't get rich based solely on their hourly rate. They get rich by buying low and selling high - real estate, stocks, antiques on a road show, or whatever. In the free market economy, someone wins, and someone loses. "C J Campbell" wrote in : "Judah" wrote in message ... How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? Here we have the crux of what passes for liberalism these days. Idiot. The assumption is that if you possess something, it must have been stolen from somebody else. It is astounding that liberals, who claim to be intellectuals, cannot see the blatant fallacy behind this argument. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Judah" wrote in message ... How, exactly, do the rich get richer without taking other people's assets? Here we have the crux of what passes for liberalism these days. Idiot. The assumption is that if you possess something, it must have been stolen from somebody else. It is astounding that liberals, who claim to be intellectuals, cannot see the blatant fallacy behind this argument. Oh, please read the liberal economists. They understand perfectly well the principles of investment and growth, and that any successful economy cannot be zero-sum. The differences arise partly from a moral impulse to greater equity, even at the cost of diluting some of the potential upside, and partly from a belief that we are wasting leverage by (a) under-investment in the currently disadvantaged and (b) allowing corporations to take short-term advantage at the cost of longer-term greater universal gain (example: stop the polluters because no credible free-market mechanism will stop them in time). We're not all as idiotic as some of the postings make us appear. I'd rather fly than argue any day :-) -- David Brooks |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What, exactly, then, do conservatives want?
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in link.net: "Judah" wrote in message ... Correct. They want to just take other peoples assets and keep them. Wrong. Conservatives don't want to take other peoples assets at all. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Judah" wrote in message ... What, exactly, then, do conservatives want? Freedom. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Freedom for who? And from what?
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in hlink.net: "Judah" wrote in message ... What, exactly, then, do conservatives want? Freedom. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What, exactly, then, do conservatives want?
Freedom. "There ought to be limits to freedom" -George W. Bush |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Photographer seeking 2 pilots / warbirds for photo shoot | Wings Of Fury | Aerobatics | 0 | February 26th 04 05:59 PM |