![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you saying 1) the rope is tight, or are you saying 2) you are giving the
plane a 100' running start? "AES" wrote in message ... If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Michael Ware" wrote: Are you saying 1) the rope is tight, or are you saying 2) you are giving the plane a 100' running start? "AES" wrote in message ... If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Didn't think of that -- and maybe your response is tongue in cheek -- but I had in mind "rope is tight". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other
part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Depends on the airplane, certain lpanes are built in such a way that they can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone. The Monk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Flyingmonk" wrote in message
oups.com... Depends on the airplane, certain lpanes are built in such a way that they can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone. Other than the ones we call helicopters, I've never heard of such a thing. Care to elaborate? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Flyingmonk" wrote Depends on the airplane, certain lpanes are built in such a way that they can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone. How many buckets of prop wash would it take? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other
part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. The Monk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. The Monk Yeah Monk that airplane is called a helicopter. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AES wrote:
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) That completely changes the situation. The plane couldn't take off with a regular runway if you secured it to a fixed post. -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The answer is an obvious YES. I don't know how this thread got as big
as it did :^) The Monk |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because it is interesting, and evokes thought.
"Flyingmonk" wrote in message oups.com... The answer is an obvious YES. I don't know how this thread got as big as it did :^) The Monk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |