![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Flyingmonk" wrote in message oups.com... Depends on the airplane, certain lpanes are built in such a way that they can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone. Other than the ones we call helicopters, I've never heard of such a thing. Care to elaborate? Tilt wing... Osprey? Ducking and running! :' ) Joe Schneider 8437R ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Flyingmonk" wrote Depends on the airplane, certain lpanes are built in such a way that they can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone. How many buckets of prop wash would it take? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other
part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. The Monk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flyingmonk wrote:
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. The Monk Yeah Monk that airplane is called a helicopter. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Category and class of aircraft...
aircraft includes all types of flying machines. AIRPLANE does not include helicopters, see FAR Part 1 ASEL ASES AMEL AMES the A means category airplane and the rest is the class AMEL B747 includes the type. Rotorcraft is the category and helicopter is the class. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "601XL Builder" wrDOTgiacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:43E62B1E.6080403@coxDOTnet... | Flyingmonk wrote: | If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other | part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the | propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the | airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? | | (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) | | (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) | | Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can | actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. | | The Monk | | | Yeah Monk that airplane is called a helicopter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was a joke James. I'll bet The Monk got it.
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:UtqFf.75785$QW2.44974@dukeread08... Category and class of aircraft... aircraft includes all types of flying machines. AIRPLANE does not include helicopters, see FAR Part 1 ASEL ASES AMEL AMES the A means category airplane and the rest is the class AMEL B747 includes the type. Rotorcraft is the category and helicopter is the class. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "601XL Builder" wrDOTgiacona@coxDOTnet wrote in message news:43E62B1E.6080403@coxDOTnet... | Flyingmonk wrote: | If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other | part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the | propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the | airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? | | (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) | | (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) | | Depends on the airplane, if a plane is built in such a way that it can | actually attain enough lift just from the prop wash alone than yes. | | The Monk | | | Yeah Monk that airplane is called a helicopter. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The mistake is in not realizing that the air that the propeller acts upon is
unchanged regardless of the speed of the conveyor belt. Therefore, the propeller will be able to pull the airframe forward on the conveyor regardless of how fast the conveyor moves, because it is putting a force on the airframe relative to the air, not relative to the conveyor belt. The same thing would happen if you attached a rope to the nose of the airplane and stood on the ground ahead of the conveyor so that you were not standing on the moving belt. Start the conveyor and the airplane stands still while the wheels spin with the conveyor belt. Now pull on the rope and you can move the airplane forward even though the conveyor is moving backwards and the wheels are spinning like crazy. The mistake I made in comparing it to a seaplane on a river is that the floats are attached to the airframe - where they go, the plane goes. No so with wheels. Wheel rotational speed has nothing to do with how fast the airframe moves in this scenario. BDS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AES wrote:
If you tie a 100 foot rope to the tail of an airplane (or some other part of the airframe), attach it to a good strong post, and run the propellor up to whatever rpm is available, is anyone claiming the airplane can then lift up say a feet off the ground? (Assuming the tail doesn't tear off) (and, a conveyor belt under the airplane is optional) That completely changes the situation. The plane couldn't take off with a regular runway if you secured it to a fixed post. -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ - |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
Navy sues man for plane he recovered in swamp | marc | Owning | 6 | March 29th 04 12:06 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |