![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:20:54 -0500, pgbnh wrote:
2. Not a 'finger flyer'. It flies heavy. I like the feel, but it takes a hand onthe yoke, not a couple of fingers. Surprised to hear this on the Sierra! My Sundowner, when trimmed is pretty much hands off. 3. Lots of doors. One on either side plus a large luggage door. Yep, always surprises a lineman when I exit out the left side :-). 4. Annuals have averaged about $2200/year for the past 15 years Mine has been about $1500, so guess flexible gears add to this? 5. Insurance - about $1500 currently for two authorized pilots with similar ratings and time Mine is $800 with me having $350 hours at my last renewal. I am now over $540 so I hope to see a drop. 6. Speed - not real fast. Zero wind is probably about 115kts. But if I am just out to make holes inthe sky I can crank it back to 17 inches of MP and 2000 rpm and burn 4gph at 90kts. Not quite sure I understand you only getting 5 knots more then my Sundowner? 7. Built like a truck. If you want a sports car, this is not your plane 8. Great instrument platform - stable, fairly high wing loading Yes, agree, trailing link gear, and stable as a table when trimmed right. Allen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 9-Feb-2006, "pgbnh" wrote: Speed - not real fast. Zero wind is probably about 115kts. Is that at 75%? If so, it's about 25 kts slower than an Arrow which uses essentially the same engine (Lyc IO-360). Slower than an Archer with 20 fewer horses and fixed gear. That's pretty ugly! Are you sure you're remembering to raise the gear? -- -Elliott Drucker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is broader and roomier than an Arrow. That interior space comes with a
penalty. I also do not believe an Arrow will get 140kts at 75% wrote in message news:t3UGf.12957$j07.2997@trnddc04... On 9-Feb-2006, "pgbnh" wrote: Speed - not real fast. Zero wind is probably about 115kts. Is that at 75%? If so, it's about 25 kts slower than an Arrow which uses essentially the same engine (Lyc IO-360). Slower than an Archer with 20 fewer horses and fixed gear. That's pretty ugly! Are you sure you're remembering to raise the gear? -- -Elliott Drucker |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 10-Feb-2006, "pgbnh" wrote: I also do not believe an Arrow will get 140kts at 75% My Arrow IV seems to. But I usually cruise at 65% and get 135 kts. It does have a couple of speed mods, however. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-02-10, pgbnh wrote:
It is broader and roomier than an Arrow. That interior space comes with a penalty. I also do not believe an Arrow will get 140kts at 75% The Arrow I we used to have in our club would always true out at 140kts at 7000/8000 ft MSL. It had the 200hp IO-360. The 200hp Super Musketeer the club had would true out at about 115kts TAS at the same altitude. -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comanche accident averted last evening | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | April 13th 05 10:02 AM |
REAL BUDGET BUSTER | Cribsheet | Piloting | 2 | December 18th 04 10:02 PM |
Commanche alternatives? | John Cook | Military Aviation | 99 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
Commanche alternatives? | Kevin Brooks | Naval Aviation | 23 | March 24th 04 03:22 AM |
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | November 19th 03 02:18 PM |