![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger wrote: On 6 Feb 2006 11:40:13 -0800, wrote: Roger wrote: On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:50:04 GMT, Richard Lamb wrote: Might we go a bit farther? The reason I ask is that I've seen people take big lungfuls of Helium, which (obviously) doesn't produce the same effect. A really big lung full can make you light headed in a hurry, but beyond that? Can someone explain why N is such a disaster but He doesn't? "I think" it has to do with the partial pressure of He compared to N, but I really don't know. Partial Pressure of a gas is what the pressure would be if all the other gasses were removed without changing the volume. Equal volumes of gas at the same temperature and pressure have equal numbers of molecules (Avogadro's law). So no, that isn't the explanation. I thought Avogadro's Law (number the same?) was a gram molecular weight of any element will have the same number of molecules as the gram molecular weight for any other element. As I recall it's 6 X 10^28 Perhaps he has more than one law named for him. In essence, Avogadro's number is the conversion factor between gram molecular weight of an and the number of molecules in a sample of that element with a mass numerically equal in grams to its gram molecular weight. Which, as stated in the law you quote, is the same for all elements, or for that matter any substance which consists of but a single molecule. 6.022 E23, as I recall. Avogadro's law, Boyle's law and Charles' law may be combined to produce the ideal gas law. -- FF |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb 2006 10:08:43 -0800, wrote:
Roger wrote: On 6 Feb 2006 11:40:13 -0800, wrote: Roger wrote: On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:50:04 GMT, Richard Lamb wrote: Might we go a bit farther? The reason I ask is that I've seen people take big lungfuls of Helium, which (obviously) doesn't produce the same effect. A really big lung full can make you light headed in a hurry, but beyond that? Can someone explain why N is such a disaster but He doesn't? "I think" it has to do with the partial pressure of He compared to N, but I really don't know. Partial Pressure of a gas is what the pressure would be if all the other gasses were removed without changing the volume. Equal volumes of gas at the same temperature and pressure have equal numbers of molecules (Avogadro's law). So no, that isn't the explanation. I thought Avogadro's Law (number the same?) was a gram molecular weight of any element will have the same number of molecules as the gram molecular weight for any other element. As I recall it's 6 X 10^28 Perhaps he has more than one law named for him. In essence, Avogadro's number is the conversion factor between gram molecular weight of an and the number of molecules in a sample of that element with a mass numerically equal in grams to its gram molecular weight. Which, as stated in the law you quote, is the same for all elements, or for that matter any substance which consists of but a single molecule. 6.022 E23, as I recall. Avogadro's law, Boyle's law and Charles' law may be combined to produce the ideal gas law. Back in college we had two chemistry books that had exponents on that that differed by several digits. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helium is almost exactly the dilutional asphyxiant that nitrogen is.
It's used in deep-diving artificial atmospheres for two reasons: Nitrogen is a weak anesthetic gas, producing intoxication at several atmospheres pressure--(nitrogen narcosis"), and it's soluble enough in blood and other water-based body fluids to fizz out when the pressure is released suddenly (the bends, caisson worker's disease). Helium has neither of these properties. But breath helium in the absence of oxygen and, just like if you breath nitrogen in similar circumstances, you will become unconscious, have an anoxic seizure, and die. It's the same mechanism as used by the suicide who surrounds himself with non-burning natural gas in an oven. The people you've seen get away with a breath or two of it on the residual oxygen in their lungs and blood. They can't get away with it for long, and there are a few deaths per year in the US from people persisting in breathing toy-balloon oxygen for voice games. There are also a few deaths to nitrous oxide breathing for intoxication, also for anoxia. As others have noted, carbon monoxide is a metabolic poison and causes problems even in the presence of normally adequate oxygen. Carbon dioxide in high concentrations is primarily a dilutional asphyxiant but, again as others have noted, also has metabolic toxic effects. David David Kazdan, MD, PhD Anesthesiologist Pilot Roger wrote: On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:50:04 GMT, Richard Lamb wrote: Might we go a bit farther? The reason I ask is that I've seen people take big lungfuls of Helium, which (obviously) doesn't produce the same effect. A really big lung full can make you light headed in a hurry, but beyond that? Can someone explain why N is such a disaster but He doesn't? "I think" it has to do with the partial pressure of He compared to N, but I really don't know. There are warnings about inhaling He, but I've not heard of any reactions like those of N2. Still, He is used as an N2 replacement in diving air at times to reduce the likely hood of getting the bends on deep dives. There *must* be some one who reads this group who knows. (Should have paid more attention in chemistry classes!) I should have gotten better grades! Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Richard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Kazdan" wrote in message m... Helium is almost exactly the dilutional asphyxiant that nitrogen is. It's used in deep-diving artificial atmospheres for two reasons: Nitrogen is a weak anesthetic gas, producing intoxication at several atmospheres pressure--(nitrogen narcosis"), and it's soluble enough in blood and other water-based body fluids to fizz out when the pressure is released suddenly (the bends, caisson worker's disease). Helium has neither of these properties. But breath helium in the absence of oxygen and, just like if you breath nitrogen in similar circumstances, you will become unconscious, have an anoxic seizure, and die. It's the same mechanism as used by the suicide who surrounds himself with non-burning natural gas in an oven. The people you've seen get away with a breath or two of it on the residual oxygen in their lungs and blood. They can't get away with it for long, and there are a few deaths per year in the US from people persisting in breathing toy-balloon oxygen for voice games. There are also a few deaths to nitrous oxide breathing for intoxication, also for anoxia. As others have noted, carbon monoxide is a metabolic poison and causes problems even in the presence of normally adequate oxygen. Carbon dioxide in high concentrations is primarily a dilutional asphyxiant but, again as others have noted, also has metabolic toxic effects. David David Kazdan, MD, PhD Anesthesiologist Pilot Excellent post, David, thank you. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Kazdan" wrote in message
m... But breath helium in the absence of oxygen and, just like if you breath nitrogen in similar circumstances, you will become unconscious, have an anoxic seizure, and die. It's the same mechanism as used by the suicide who surrounds himself with non-burning natural gas in an oven. FWIW... That's real hard to do nowdays. Back when sticking your head in the oven was a popular movie cliche, the gas distributed in most big cities was producer gas - a byproduct of of the process used to make coke out of coal - essentially partial combustion with inadequate air. The heating value of producer gas was primarily due to the carbon monoxide content (it also contained a lot of N2 and CO2 as you would expect). The CO is what made sticking your head in the oven work so well. However, since the 1950's and the development of the cross country pipelines, producer gas has been replace with natural gas (primarily methane with a little mercaptan added to make it smell) which is just not the same thing. Also, the oven burners are designed to mix air with the natural gas so it's hard to adequately displace the oxygen in the air to commit suicide by simply sticking your head in the open door. -- Geoff the sea hawk at wow way d0t com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Kazdan" wrote in message
m... . . . But breath helium in the absence of oxygen and, just like if you breath nitrogen in similar circumstances, you will become unconscious, have an anoxic seizure, and die. . . The people you've seen get away with a breath or two of it on the residual oxygen in their lungs and blood. Excellent post and, as far as I know, your facts are correct. But - I find it odd that person of your stated qualifications does not seem to know the difference between "breath" and "breathe". ????? Rich "One can be a typo. Two makes it an error. Three would be enemy action." S. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ouch, that's pretty bad. Sorry. No question about it, error. I rather
pride myself on not needing to use a spell checker, too. Ouch, ouch, ouch. Need lidocaine. David Rich S. wrote: "David Kazdan" wrote in message m... . . . But breath helium in the absence of oxygen and, just like if you breath nitrogen in similar circumstances, you will become unconscious, have an anoxic seizure, and die. . . The people you've seen get away with a breath or two of it on the residual oxygen in their lungs and blood. Excellent post and, as far as I know, your facts are correct. But - I find it odd that person of your stated qualifications does not seem to know the difference between "breath" and "breathe". ????? Rich "One can be a typo. Two makes it an error. Three would be enemy action." S. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Kazdan" wrote in message
t... Ouch, that's pretty bad. Sorry. No question about it, error. I rather pride myself on not needing to use a spell checker, too. Ouch, ouch, ouch. Need lidocaine. I think I've got a thirty year old vial of it around hear someplace. . . ![]() Rich S. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi David,
David Kazdan wrote: Helium is almost exactly the dilutional asphyxiant that nitrogen is. It's used in deep-diving artificial atmospheres for two reasons: Nitrogen is a weak anesthetic gas, producing intoxication at several atmospheres pressure--(nitrogen narcosis"), and it's soluble enough in blood and other water-based body fluids to fizz out when the pressure is released suddenly (the bends, caisson worker's disease). "Helium has neither of these properties." snip David David Kazdan, MD, PhD Anesthesiologist Pilot I hesitate to enter this discussion since you are obviously well qualified, however, that is often how learning occurs and I still have a lot to learn. I agree with all of your excellent post with one minor exception. Helium _is_ absorbed into the bloodstream under high enough partial pressure and does release bubbles when the pressure is released too quickly. Heliox (Helium + O2) and Trimix (Helium + N + O2) are common gasses used in the technical diving community, and they both require decompression stops on the way back to the surface. Technical divers use these mixes for dives from 130' (~5 atmospheres) to as much as 1000' (~31 atmospheres). The O2 content of the mixes is reduced to avoid oxygen toxicity effects at high PPO2. I also would point out that helium at high PP--although not narcotic like Nitrogen--does produce some strange physiological effects including a "buzz" similar to having had a lot of caffein. Don Woodbridge P.E. Engineer Technical Diver Pilot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Medal Winners: Air Traffic Control Tapes | Montblack | Owning | 36 | February 8th 06 11:16 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Riddle me this, pilots | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 137 | August 30th 03 04:02 AM |