|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
March 1st 06, 02:06 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
A jet needs to be faster to be efficient, the airframe is
not designed for Mach 0.60, let alone real jet speeds. wrote in message ups.com... | Hi Jim, | | That is true, but if the jet engines were small enough they wouldn't | necessarily overpower the airframe. There are some really small | turbines out these days... | | Dean | 
|
|
#2
March 1st 06, 12:33 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?
"Dallas" wrote in message k.net... Looking at the design of the C377, it seems like it should have been more of a winner. Why did it flop? Dallas Dunno, but here is a short video http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ssna+skymaster
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Hybrid Mode
