Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message
...

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
Video, or downloaded to your computer.

This crap wa debunked over a year ago (Popular Mechanics, amongst others)
and the psycho is still trowelling it out.

DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:58:19 -0500, "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com
wrote:

The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were talking to
their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How convenient that we
have new voice synthesizer technology. The government is to incompetent to
do anything close to this magnitude.

This being the same government that couldn't even break into a hotel room at
the Watergate hotel and keep it secret. Yet somehow they managed to fake
several hijackings, kill 3,000 people and sneak a hundred man ninja team armed
with tons of explosives into WTC-7 to perform a controlled demolition inside a
burning building in less than 7 hours without a single person blowing the lid
off.

And he thinks we're crazy?!?!?

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:34:00 -0500, "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com
wrote:

FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11


And this could of been standard issue or bad timing, happens every day.

Not to mention completely irrelevant. The sprinkler system for WTC-7 was fed
by a 20 inch water main under the street under the buildings. Falling debris
from the impacts of the airliners ruptured that main, there was no water
available in the building. The same ruptured main also prevented firefighters
from using city water to fight the fire and the NYFD had better things to do
that day than try to clear the streets enough to get trucks in there to fight a
fire that wasn't a clear danger to human life.

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.

Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and other
damage sure affected them, too.




WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.

Says the idiot that is off his meds.

-------------------------------------------
DW

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-A53043.00160223022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-195812.22014022022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane.

Neither were the other buildings in the area, but the fires and
other
damage sure affected them, too.

WTC7 collapsed in classic controlled demolition style.

Nope. I saw the tapes. It collapsed in classic "steel weakened by
damage and fires" style.

Some fools have tried to claim otherwise, but it's just more crap from
the looneytoons brigade.



You're now resorting to childish comments because you obviously know I'm
right.

No one thinks you are right, in fact many here would claim that you do not
in fact think at all. Now go back to your conspiracy NG's and leave us alone
k00k.

-------------------------------------
DW

As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
synthesizer technology.

When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?

"Mom, this is Mark Bingham"

The only synt tech is barking out of your own asshole, asshole.

What a freak show!!

LOONBOY!! GIT YOUR LOONBOY HERE!!!!