Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 01:39:26 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

There is NO concrete evidence (at this time) that it was thermite.

Jones' paper is a hypothesis. See here if not familiar:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypothesis

The evidence he shows suggests controlled demolitions. The purpose of his
paper is to call for a new investigation.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...ltl=1141667399

So lets sum this up, shall we?

Jones is calling for a new investigation, not on the basis of any concrete
evidence, but entirely on his dislike of the original investigation.

What makes Jones think he's entitled to use my money to fund his own private
investigation?

Wake Up! wrote:

mrtravel wrote in
. com:


Wake Up! wrote:



Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that?

Where is the evidence that it was thermite?
You posted a link to someone who claimed it was nuclear.
Are you going to claim you didn't read that either?
You have a habit of posting links as "proof" and then claiming these
are not your beliefs.




There is NO concrete evidence (at this time) that it was thermite.


Then isn't the subject line YOU selected NOT very accurate?

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:25:07 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.

Faculty qualified to critique his scientific claims from such diverse fields
as psychology, psychiatry, economics, history, literature and politics.

Feel free to give me the name of ONE of the Physicists or Civil Engineers from
BYU that he has convinced.

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:25:07 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon

Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.

Why all the evidence is in the proofs you keep posting !

And the investigation those faculty members think should happen ?
Why do I suspect they want to know how Dr Jones came to his degree in
structural engineering



--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

Tank Fixer wrote in
k.net:

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:25:07 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....

"khobar" wrote in
news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you
are aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent
you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since
thermite isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it
being used. Har har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess
to a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate
steel? Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in
metal at the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in
the videos? Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I
love the way you deniers aren't able to take everything into
context, and instead give silly reasons for each and every piece
of information, so you can hold on to your absurd government
conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a
nuclear reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in
the videos? Yes. Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon

Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters
are growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22
seminar, he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new
investigation.

Why all the evidence is in the proofs you keep posting !

And the investigation those faculty members think should happen ?
Why do I suspect they want to know how Dr Jones came to his degree in
structural engineering


This is what they're calling for:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...ltl=1141667399

Jones' has a PhD in physics, so he should be qualified to determine in
the government's version of the collapses defy phsyics.


i.e. from his paper:





"Those who wish to preserve fundamental physical laws as inviolate may
wish to take a closer look. Consider the collapse of the South WTC Tower
on 9-11:
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evide..._collapse.mpeg





Top ~ 30 floors of South Tower topple over.

What happens to the block and its angular momentum?



We observe that approximately 30 upper floors begin to rotate as a block,
to the south and east. They begin to topple over, as favored by the Law
of Increasing Entropy. The torque due to gravity on this block is
enormous, as is its angular momentum. But then – and this I’m still
puzzling over – this block turned mostly to powder in mid-air! How can we
understand this strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable,
amazing – and demanding scrutiny since the US government-funded reports
failed to analyze this phenomenon. But, of course, the Final NIST 9-11
report “does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower
after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached.” (NIST, 2005,
p. 80, fn. 1; emphasis added.)


Indeed, if we seek the truth of the matter, we must NOT ignore the data
to be observed during the actual collapses of the towers, as the NIST
team admits they did. But why did they do such a non-scientific
procedure as to ignore highly-relevant data? The business smacks of
political constraints on what was supposed to be an “open and thorough”
investigation. (See Mooney, 2005.)


So I with others call for an open and thorough investigation. I hope the
international community will rise to the challenge. The field is wide
open for considering the alternative hypothesis outlined here, due to its
neglect by studies funded by the US government."

In article ,
on Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:04:10 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....

Tank Fixer wrote in
k.net:

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:25:07 GMT,
Wake Up! attempted to say .....

"khobar" wrote in
news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you
are aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent
you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since
thermite isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it
being used. Har har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess
to a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate
steel? Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in
metal at the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in
the videos? Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I
love the way you deniers aren't able to take everything into
context, and instead give silly reasons for each and every piece
of information, so you can hold on to your absurd government
conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a
nuclear reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in
the videos? Yes. Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon

Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters
are growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22
seminar, he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new
investigation.

Why all the evidence is in the proofs you keep posting !

And the investigation those faculty members think should happen ?
Why do I suspect they want to know how Dr Jones came to his degree in
structural engineering


This is what they're calling for:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...ltl=1141667399

Jones' has a PhD in physics, so he should be qualified to determine in
the government's version of the collapses defy phsyics.

So he has no background in structural engineering ?
Nor the mechanics of matertials either I take it.

A degree in physics is just that.


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:04:10 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

This is what they're calling for:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...ltl=1141667399

Jones' has a PhD in physics, so he should be qualified to determine in
the government's version of the collapses defy phsyics.

So someone with a PhD in medicine should be qualified to perform brain
surgery? Or is it just possible that a PhD in one field doesn't automatically
make you an expert in anything but that one field?

In article ,
"Wake Up!" wet his bed, picked his nose, drooled and
pecked out:

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.


How do we know that it really wasn't Klingons, traveling back in time,
using their disrupter weapons to destroy WTC #1, #2 and #7? All those
straw men that the "9/11 'truth' movement" so disingenuously proposes
have about the same credibility as the Klingon notion.

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Wake Up!" wet his bed, picked his nose, drooled and
pecked out:

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22
seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new
investigation.


How do we know that it really wasn't Klingons, traveling back in time,
using their disrupter weapons to destroy WTC #1, #2 and #7? All those
straw men that the "9/11 'truth' movement" so disingenuously proposes
have about the same credibility as the Klingon notion.

Klingons have not been shown to do time travel, AFAIK, so there.

The Borg, on the other hand...(I wonder if Prof. Jones has explored this
one?)

Paul Nixon

In article ,
on Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:34:45 GMT,
Orval Fairbairn attempted to say .....

In article ,
"Wake Up!" wet his bed, picked his nose, drooled and
pecked out:

"khobar" wrote in news:30NQf.421$PE.346@fed1read05:

"Wake Up!" wrote in message
...
"khobar" wrote in
news:kZBQf.392$PE.376@fed1read05:

"Keith W" wrote in message
...

"Wake UP!" wrote in message
...
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite.htm


I've seen and used thermite and thats not it, by the way you are
aware that thermite isnt used to demolish buildings arent you ?

Yes he is, but that's the beauty of his conspiracy - since thermite
isn't used for demolition, no one would suspect it being used. Har
har har de har har.

Paul Nixon





As if that means anything, or has any bearing whatsoever. (I guess to
a reality denier it might.) Can thermite partially evaporate steel?
Yes. Could thermite cause the temperatures that existed in metal at
the WTC? Yes. Can thermite cause metal dripping like in the videos?
Yes. Were those three items present at the WTC? Yes. I love the way
you deniers aren't able to take everything into context, and instead
give silly reasons for each and every piece of information, so you
can hold on to your absurd government conspiracy theory. LOL!!

Can a nuclear reaction partially evaporate steel? Yes. Could a nuclear
reaction cause the temperatures that existed in metal at the WTC? Yes.
Can a nuclear reaction cause metal dripping like in the videos? Yes.
Were these three items present at the WTC? Yes.

Oops...

Paul Nixon





Okay. Where's the evidence supporting that? Let's not forget that
hundreds of people (many professors) read his paper. His supporters are
growing, not shrinking. And based of his evidence at his Sept 22 seminar,
he convinced 60 faculty members that there should be a new investigation.


How do we know that it really wasn't Klingons, traveling back in time,
using their disrupter weapons to destroy WTC #1, #2 and #7? All those
straw men that the "9/11 'truth' movement" so disingenuously proposes
have about the same credibility as the Klingon notion.


Now that you mention it Dr Jones does look vaguely Klingon.
Without the forehead ridges of course..

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.