|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
March 27th 06, 08:11 PM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
What's the latest on "forecast icing = known icing"
Doug wrote:
Just use the airmets. If there is an airmet for icing, you can't go. If there is no airmet, you might be able to go if conditions allow it. In lieu of the new type of icing forecasts that are supposedly going to grace your local FSS and DUATs this year, one could assume that the FAA is aware the current icing AIRMETs are too broad-brushed in their coverage for your advice to be practical to any pilot downwind of the Great Lakes who desires some utility out of his aircraft October through May. -- Peter 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Issues around de-ice on a 182 | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 87 | September 28th 05 12:46 AM |
| Known Icing requirements | Jeffrey Ross | Owning | 1 | November 20th 04 04:01 AM |
| Icing Airmets | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | March 3rd 04 02:20 AM |
| FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 08:44 PM |
| FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 98 | December 11th 03 07:58 AM |
Threaded Mode