|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
March 28th 06, 12:13 AM
posted to rec.aviation.ifr
|
|||
|
|||
What's the latest on "forecast icing = known icing"
Bob Gardner wrote:
The latest on known icing is a 2004 case... http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pi...05/pc0508.html In all my years of lecturing on icing and attending FAA icing conferences I have never heard anyone, FAA or NWS, put forward the argument that you espouse. It is bogus. Even before the 2004 case it was well established by the NTSB (Administrator vs Bowen) that forecast conditions of moisture plus below-freezing temps constitut known icing. You are late to the party, Gary. So are you saying that he misquoted the AIM or are you saying that the AIM is wrong? Matt 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Issues around de-ice on a 182 | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 87 | September 28th 05 12:46 AM |
| Known Icing requirements | Jeffrey Ross | Owning | 1 | November 20th 04 04:01 AM |
| Icing Airmets | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | March 3rd 04 02:20 AM |
| FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 08:44 PM |
| FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 98 | December 11th 03 07:58 AM |
Threaded Mode