![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Judah" wrote in message
. .. Frankly, I think the BRS is about the only innovative safety system out there, and it's obvious why... One has to wonder if perhaps it would be cheaper to just supply all of the occupants in the aircraft with a parachute... Quick Google search brough up prices anywhere from $900-$3000... Maybe for skydivers, the $3000 one might give them a certain advantage, but I suspect the $900 one would be perfectly good for getting your butt to the ground with minimal injuries... I'm just not so sure about whether I can get out of the plane, deploy the chute and survive from the 300 ft that the BRS chute claims is their minimum activation altitude... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Grumman-581" wrote in message ... "Judah" wrote in message . .. Frankly, I think the BRS is about the only innovative safety system out there, and it's obvious why... One has to wonder if perhaps it would be cheaper to just supply all of the occupants in the aircraft with a parachute... Quick Google search brough up prices anywhere from $900-$3000... Maybe for skydivers, the $3000 one might give them a certain advantage, but I suspect the $900 one would be perfectly good for getting your butt to the ground with minimal injuries... I'm just not so sure about whether I can get out of the plane, deploy the chute and survive from the 300 ft that the BRS chute claims is their minimum activation altitude... Many people have trouble getting out of a plane while it's sitting on the ground at a standstill. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
The fact that you list both GA and auto fatality statistics implies that you wish to compare them in some way. So I must ask why you would wish to eliminate spt's from the equation, while not eliminating sdt's (stupid driver tricks)? Surely you must realize that many auto fatalities are the result of sdt's (eating/talking on phone/driving with not enough sleep/drinking/etc...) - acts that you undoubtably avoid just as you avoid spt's. Are you simply trying to comfort yourself in the feeling that GA flying is safer than it really is? Note - I am not discounting the higher probability of someone else's sdt killing you while you drive, while it's likely that you would only die from your own spt while flying. -CK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fact that you list both GA and auto fatality statistics implies
that you wish to compare them in some way. So I must ask why you would wish to eliminate spt's from the equation, while not eliminating sdt's (stupid driver tricks)? It's not that I don't want to compare them -- I do, if only for the purposes of comparison. Removing stupid tricks from both figures would be okay by me. Really, though, I don't care about the risks of driving. I *do* care about the risks of flying. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |