Air Scooter a Farce???

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://airscooter.com

I am sure you have seen this Air Scooter flying machine. But last year
they said it would go on sale in 2005 and now it is 2006. Is this thing
turning into another Mollar Sky Car farce? Also, the
email address is not valid any longer. Does this
sound fishy to anyone else?


If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it autorotate.
Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Monk

Flyingmonk wrote
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it
autorotate. Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.

:-) :-)

Bob Moore

"Bob Moore" wrote in message
. 122...
Flyingmonk wrote
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it
autorotate. Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.

:-) :-)

Bob Moore

Well yes I mistyped and wrote their when I should have written they're. That
didn't keep me from passing the check ride for my rotorcraft-helicopter
rating though.

Bob Moore wrote:
Flyingmonk wrote
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it
autorotate. Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.

:-) :-)

Bob Moore

By having two, three or four engines like the Nolan brother's or the
Gen 4.

Monk

Flyingmonk wrote:
Bob Moore wrote:
Flyingmonk wrote
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it
autorotate. Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.

:-) :-)

Bob Moore

By having two, three or four engines like the Nolan brother's or the
Gen 4.

Monk

Two engined:
http://www.helis.com/types/comultra.php
*scroll down to Eagle's Perch.

Four engined:
http://www.gen-corp.jp/GENH-4_en/

I'd still prefer a one engined helo with autorotation capability over
the above two.

Monk

Flyingmonk wrote

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.
:-) :-)

By having two, three or four engines like the Nolan brother's or the
Gen 4.


Yes, I know what "redunancy" means, how about "redonancy"? :-)

Bob

Bob Moore wrote:
Flyingmonk wrote
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
If their smart they are trying to figure out how to make it
autorotate. Without that it is a death trap.

"If they're smart" they'd design in the ability to autorotate or have
power redondancy.

Well...you corrected Gig's "their", but being a fixed wing pilot,
I'm not sure what this "power redondancy" is in rotary wing talk.

:-) :-)

Bob Moore

LOL, now I get it... I actually did not correct Gig's "their", but
just typing it correctly myself. I didn't mean to point out that he
used the wrong "their". I often use "there" where I should have used
"their" on many occasions myself.

Monk

"Flyingmonk" wrote

LOL, now I get it... I actually did not correct Gig's "their", but
just typing it correctly myself. I didn't mean to point out that he
used the wrong "their". I often use "there" where I should have used
"their" on many occasions myself.

Their is absolutely know reason two mix up the different uses of this common
word. Other less intelligent people than me are using they're different
spellings, and have no idea witch won there supposed too be using.

No what I meen?

g

And we wander why so many people have a hard time using English properly.
--
Jim in NC