![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
GPS is optimised for sea level, Blanchefort [a mountaintop ruined castle] is 467 metres above sea level, couple this with a slant range to a satellite of several thousand miles and the curvature of the earth and you have error. At least up to 100 metres..." That's just plain BS. Just one example: The space shuttle uses GPS for navigation. That should be plenty high to convince the poster otherwise. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
That's just plain BS. Just one example: The space shuttle uses GPS for navigation. That should be plenty high to convince the poster otherwise. Would an ordinary GPS receiver (say, my $99 eTrex) work on the shuttle? I can see how the basic principles are the same, but I'm guessing my eTrex wouldn't be happy with the speeds the shuttle is doing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy,
I can see how the basic principles are the same, but I'm guessing my eTrex wouldn't be happy with the speeds the shuttle is doing. Many cheaper GPS receiver do indeed have a speed limit. Is it given in the specs for the eTrex? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
I can see how the basic principles are the same, but I'm guessing my eTrex wouldn't be happy with the speeds the shuttle is doing. Many cheaper GPS receiver do indeed have a speed limit. Is it given in the specs for the eTrex? There are technology export regulations that limit GPS receivers to operation below altitudes of 60 kft or below speeds of 1000 knots. Most consumer models, including the eTrex, are specified to work up to those limits. However, some units have lower limits - for example, most Magellan models specify a maximum speed of 951mph. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-06-11, David W wrote:
"GPS is optimised for sea level, Blanchefort [a mountaintop ruined castle] is 467 metres above sea level, couple this with a slant range to a satellite of several thousand miles and the curvature of the earth and you have error. At least up to 100 metres..." Well, in a light plane cruising between 4,000 and 8,000 feet, my handheld Garmin 195 reports an estimated position error of 13 feet - about 4 metres. Your friend doesn't know what he's talking about. The map is only optimized for aviation in that it depicts airspace - the receiver itself and the way it generates the map is no different from a GPS for use by sailors or drivers or hikers. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
ADF/VOR navigation question | John Bell | Simulators | 0 | December 23rd 03 04:30 PM |