A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

23 July OSH accident audio



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 06, 12:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote:

As for not announcing that the incident/accident was fatal, not a problem.
Simply say "accident" and be done with it. Now we know it isn't airport
overload.


How about this:
on ATIS: "Oshkosh Airport is closed indefinitely. All aircraft are
advised to land at other airports. A NOTAM stating the airport closure
has been issued. When the airport is re-opened, the NOTAM will be
cancelled. The RIPON Arrival Procedure will remain in effect following
the reopening of the airport."

FISKE Controllers: "Oshkosh Airport is closed. Any aircraft inbound on
the RIPON Arrival Procedure are instructed to land at another airport
until the Oshkosh Airport reopens. Any aircraft proceeding beyond FISKE
will not be allowed to land at Oshkosh."

OSH Tower: "The Oshkosh Airport is closed indefinitely. Any aircraft
landing while the airport is closed will be subject to FAA enforcement
actions. You are instructed to depart the Oshkosh Class D Airspace and
remain clear. A NOTAM advising of the airport closure has been issued.
It is recommended that all aircraft desiring to land Oshkosh divert to
an outlying airport and monitor the NOTAM for cancellation and reopening
of the Oshkosh Airport."
  #2  
Old August 2nd 06, 12:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default 23 July OSH accident audio


"john smith" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote:

As for not announcing that the incident/accident was fatal, not a
problem.
Simply say "accident" and be done with it. Now we know it isn't airport
overload.



FISKE Controllers: "Oshkosh Airport is closed. Any aircraft inbound on
the RIPON Arrival Procedure are instructed to land at another airport
until the Oshkosh Airport reopens. Any aircraft proceeding beyond FISKE
will not be allowed to land at Oshkosh."


I disagree with this one. If you don't go to another airport, you are
disobeying a direct order from ATC. I prefer to give the pilot the option
of the Rush Lake hold, the Green Lake hold, or diversion at the pilot's
option. All questions of the nature "how long will the hold be" are
answered the same way, "the hold is indefinite ... there has been an
accident at Oshkosh airport."

THe procedure is Fisk, not FISKE.

And I'd have Fisk ask the first ten or twenty aircraft in the ensuing open
field lineup to say words on the aircraft's radio that the field is open.
THat way those who have diverted and are listening on a handheld below the
ATIS line of sight will have a clue that the airport has reopened. Line of
sight (radio horizon) for an aircraft at 1000 AGL is about 45 miles.

Jim

Jim


  #3  
Old August 1st 06, 02:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?


Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view
is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and
investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would
probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up.
Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral.

It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my=
decision. I value that.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #4  
Old August 1st 06, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Burns[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 329
Default 23 July OSH accident audio

Well said, and it has an added plus. The more pilots that take the
"accident announcement" to mean that the hold will be longer than they are
comfortable with, the more pilots that may leave the congested airspace and
resultantly open up more room and a larger safety factor for not only
themselves, but for those pilots who decide to stay in the hold.

It's a win for those who want to leave, it's a win for those who want to
stay, and it's a win for the controllers.

Jim


"Jose" wrote in message
. ..
How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"?


Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view
is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and
investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would
probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up.
Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral.

It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my=
decision. I value that.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.