![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote: As for not announcing that the incident/accident was fatal, not a problem. Simply say "accident" and be done with it. Now we know it isn't airport overload. How about this: on ATIS: "Oshkosh Airport is closed indefinitely. All aircraft are advised to land at other airports. A NOTAM stating the airport closure has been issued. When the airport is re-opened, the NOTAM will be cancelled. The RIPON Arrival Procedure will remain in effect following the reopening of the airport." FISKE Controllers: "Oshkosh Airport is closed. Any aircraft inbound on the RIPON Arrival Procedure are instructed to land at another airport until the Oshkosh Airport reopens. Any aircraft proceeding beyond FISKE will not be allowed to land at Oshkosh." OSH Tower: "The Oshkosh Airport is closed indefinitely. Any aircraft landing while the airport is closed will be subject to FAA enforcement actions. You are instructed to depart the Oshkosh Class D Airspace and remain clear. A NOTAM advising of the airport closure has been issued. It is recommended that all aircraft desiring to land Oshkosh divert to an outlying airport and monitor the NOTAM for cancellation and reopening of the Oshkosh Airport." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john smith" wrote in message ... In article , "RST Engineering" wrote: As for not announcing that the incident/accident was fatal, not a problem. Simply say "accident" and be done with it. Now we know it isn't airport overload. FISKE Controllers: "Oshkosh Airport is closed. Any aircraft inbound on the RIPON Arrival Procedure are instructed to land at another airport until the Oshkosh Airport reopens. Any aircraft proceeding beyond FISKE will not be allowed to land at Oshkosh." I disagree with this one. If you don't go to another airport, you are disobeying a direct order from ATC. I prefer to give the pilot the option of the Rush Lake hold, the Green Lake hold, or diversion at the pilot's option. All questions of the nature "how long will the hold be" are answered the same way, "the hold is indefinite ... there has been an accident at Oshkosh airport." THe procedure is Fisk, not FISKE. And I'd have Fisk ask the first ten or twenty aircraft in the ensuing open field lineup to say words on the aircraft's radio that the field is open. THat way those who have diverted and are listening on a handheld below the ATIS line of sight will have a clue that the airport has reopened. Line of sight (radio horizon) for an aircraft at 1000 AGL is about 45 miles. Jim Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there
because of an accident"? Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up. Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral. It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my= decision. I value that. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well said, and it has an added plus. The more pilots that take the
"accident announcement" to mean that the hold will be longer than they are comfortable with, the more pilots that may leave the congested airspace and resultantly open up more room and a larger safety factor for not only themselves, but for those pilots who decide to stay in the hold. It's a win for those who want to leave, it's a win for those who want to stay, and it's a win for the controllers. Jim "Jose" wrote in message . .. How? What changes in your evaluation from "hold there" to "hold there because of an accident"? Each pilot will make their own determination. What changes in =my= view is that after an accident, there would likely be cleanup and investigation, and the runway may be closed for a long time. I would probably choose to divert if a circuit or two doesn't clear it up. Other reasons for holds are more ephemeral. It is true, I could make the wrong decision, but it would be =my= decision. I value that. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |