![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: Yes, but our resident fighter pilot asserts: On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:34:22 GMT, Ed Rasimus wrote in : Regardless, the flight plan type for the military is IFR. If that were true, it prompts my questioning the need for VFR MTRs. Oh heavens no. It's not uncommon for the F16's around here to show up VFR unannounced, do a few approaches and then a few patterns and then disappear VFR. And of course the helicopters are always flitting around VFR. They may stop, they may just get flight following for awhile as long as we can see them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:55:12 -0600, Newps wrote
in : Larry Dighera wrote: Yes, but our resident fighter pilot asserts: On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:34:22 GMT, Ed Rasimus wrote in : Regardless, the flight plan type for the military is IFR. If that were true, it prompts my questioning the need for VFR MTRs. Oh heavens no. It's not uncommon for the F16's around here to show up VFR unannounced, do a few approaches and then a few patterns and then disappear VFR. And of course the helicopters are always flitting around VFR. They may stop, they may just get flight following for awhile as long as we can see them. So it would seem, that in your experience with F-16s (not helos with which Mr. Rasimus was uncertain), Mr. Rasimus' assertion "the flight plan type for the military is IFR" is not always the case. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Dighera wrote: So it would seem, that in your experience with F-16s (not helos with which Mr. Rasimus was uncertain), Mr. Rasimus' assertion "the flight plan type for the military is IFR" is not always the case. It's a ridiculous assertion. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:37:17 -0600, Newps wrote:
Larry Dighera wrote: So it would seem, that in your experience with F-16s (not helos with which Mr. Rasimus was uncertain), Mr. Rasimus' assertion "the flight plan type for the military is IFR" is not always the case. It's a ridiculous assertion. Can you establish some credentials. If I am wrong, I will admit it. But right now we have you with a pseudonym and posting from . Are you a controller? Military? A pilot? Civilian or military? Are you part of the ATC structure? Do you handle the flight plans? Work in base ops? Are you in scheduling? I have made mistakes in the past--my first wife comes to mind. But, I flew fasts jets for the company for 23 years at various locations around the world. That gives me a leg up on Mr. Dighera and unless you possess some currency qualifications, it would seem to give me some insight over you as well. If wrong, I'm happy to admit it. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:10:54 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote: On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:55:12 -0600, Newps wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: Yes, but our resident fighter pilot asserts: On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:34:22 GMT, Ed Rasimus wrote in : Regardless, the flight plan type for the military is IFR. If that were true, it prompts my questioning the need for VFR MTRs. Oh heavens no. It's not uncommon for the F16's around here to show up VFR unannounced, do a few approaches and then a few patterns and then disappear VFR. And of course the helicopters are always flitting around VFR. They may stop, they may just get flight following for awhile as long as we can see them. So it would seem, that in your experience with F-16s (not helos with which Mr. Rasimus was uncertain), Mr. Rasimus' assertion "the flight plan type for the military is IFR" is not always the case. Let's establish some things with Newp. Where is "here" and who is "we"? Where did the F-16s come from? Does he work at an ATC facility? At a military or joint-use airport? The Vipers departed their home station on an IFR flight plan--they most likely conduct most of their mission in visual conditions and under visual flight rules--but they depart the home station and recover on an IFR flight plan. The departed on an instrument departure, whether to a training area or a range or another airport. The will recover on an instrument penetration which may terminate in an instrument approach or a VFR hand-off to tower. It is still an IFR flight plan. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Ed Rasimus" wrote)
Let's establish some things with Newp. Where is "here" and who is "we"? Where did the F-16s come from? Does he work at an ATC facility? At a military or joint-use airport? ATC ...out west. Google/Groups/RAP/Newps/First thread.../Second thread.../etc Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |