![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... Let's not forget that the articles that prompted this thread were about how to build a plane with at least the same performance and safety as many kit planes, but for much less money. NO.... INCORRECT........... Lets go back and READ. The thread started out talking about inexpensive wood sources and how sometimes good stuff can be had at box stores like Home Depot. RS Hoover specifically referenced his past writings on wood selection in post one of this thread. It had NOTHING to do with performance, just the use of lo buck wood. SOMEBODY morphed this into a design circular argument, but getting back on point isn't on some folks agenda. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() pbc76049 (removethis) wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Let's not forget that the articles that prompted this thread were about how to build a plane with at least the same performance and safety as many kit planes, but for much less money. NO.... INCORRECT........... Lets go back and READ. The thread started out talking about inexpensive wood sources and how sometimes good stuff can be had at box stores like Home Depot. RS Hoover specifically referenced his past writings on wood selection in post one of this thread. It had NOTHING to do with performance, just the use of lo buck wood. SOMEBODY morphed this into a design circular argument, but getting back on point isn't on some folks agenda. How does buying your own wood, instead of buying the wood as part of a kit, change the performance of the plane? -- FF |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger wrote: airplane is quite a misnomer. Which is the reason why, IMHO, one should not recommend that a homebuilder use an engine that has never, or almost never flown successfully. If the homebuilder is a genuine gearhead, they'll already have their own ideas, if not, they ought to avoid breaking new ground unless or until they become one. If you aren't a "gearhead" why the hell are you thinking about BUILDING AN AIRPLANE???? It's cheaper?? It isn't. Cheaper? Are you kidding? By the time I finish the G-III (If I ever do) I'll have more than twice the price of the Deb in it and that is going with a used engine and prop. In other words you could have bought a T-6 or an L-39 when you started and they would now be worth much more than the G-III (I assume by G-III you do not mean what averyone else I know means by a G-III-a large Grumman with two turbofans used to haul VIPs and train Shuttle pilots on approaches.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Aug 2006 10:43:03 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Roger wrote: airplane is quite a misnomer. Which is the reason why, IMHO, one should not recommend that a homebuilder use an engine that has never, or almost never flown successfully. If the homebuilder is a genuine gearhead, they'll already have their own ideas, if not, they ought to avoid breaking new ground unless or until they become one. If you aren't a "gearhead" why the hell are you thinking about BUILDING AN AIRPLANE???? It's cheaper?? It isn't. Cheaper? Are you kidding? By the time I finish the G-III (If I ever do) I'll have more than twice the price of the Deb in it and that is going with a used engine and prop. In other words you could have bought a T-6 or an L-39 when you started and they would now be worth much more than the G-III (I assume by G-III you do not mean what averyone else I know means by a G-III-a large Grumman with two turbofans used to haul VIPs and train Shuttle Any one except those that build their own airplanes. :-)) Actually I could have purchased a relatively low time, very nice L-39 with a brand new (spare) engine still in the can for what I paid for the Deb or what I have in the G-III. The T-6s were about double that price back then. As for wood I'd think, which means I don't know for sure, that pallets and shipping containers which may look rough, probably have better wood in them than the stuff we purchase to put into homes now days. The crate my G-III came in is far better wood than I can find at any of the local lumberyards except the one that mills the stuff when you order it. There is a *slight* difference in price.:-)) I should have kept the Ash tree that died in the front yard. It was out by the power lines so the power company came out, trimmed it and left me with a 20 foot tallt, stump about 2' across at the base and over a foot at the top, that must have weighed well over a ton. Man but that was some dense stuff. OTOH it's a crime to even ship, or move dead Ash from one location to another around here. (courtesy of the "Emerald Ash Borer") Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com pilots on approaches.) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins | Ramapriya | Piloting | 72 | November 23rd 04 04:05 AM |
Wanted: VFR Safety Pilot near Milwaukee, WI - Cheap flying for you | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | September 16th 04 03:25 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |