A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ethanol Powered Aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 17th 06, 05:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

You have to admit, you had that one coming, from the moment you hit "send."
;-)


Nope. From the moment I hit "reply".

Actually, some particle accelerators used hamsters to clean the tunnels.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #2  
Old August 17th 06, 05:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 632
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

Jose wrote:
You have to admit, you had that one coming, from the moment you hit
"send."
;-)


Nope. From the moment I hit "reply".

Actually, some particle accelerators used hamsters to clean the tunnels.

Jose


Huh? Particle accelerator tunnels are a little too large for hamsters
to clean.

I must have missed something.
  #3  
Old August 17th 06, 02:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Jose" wrote

Do you really think that terrorists who plan ten years ahead won't have
moles in the reactors?


Nah, moles in the reactors will not do any good. They are just small
rodents.

Anyway, moles in reactors would be quickly killed from all of the
radiation.

g


No... They'd mutate into Molezilla


  #4  
Old August 17th 06, 02:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 407
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft


"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote

No... They'd mutate into Molezilla


Well, Superman had a problem overcoming Kryptonyte, so I wonder if Molezilla
has a problem with Grubenyte?
g
--
Jim in NC

  #5  
Old August 17th 06, 03:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

No... They'd mutate into Molezilla

At first I read that as "Molezerilla", but that would be pretty cheezy.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #6  
Old August 17th 06, 06:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:04:03 GMT, Jose
wrote:
Besides the repulsive words that follow


Awh, gee, I'm not ****in' politically correct... That just breaks my
****in' heart...

don't you think that a country that can't educate itself, that
still believes in gods and spirits, that rejects evolution, and
that believes taking shoes off and banning toothpaste
and fine wines on carry-on luggage keeps us safe, is not
really the right country to entrust bunches of nuclear reactors to?


Hmmm... The way you describe it, it must really suck to live up there
in Connecticut... I can understand it though -- It must suck having to
live around so many Damn Yankees...

Do you really think that terrorists who plan ten years ahead
won't have moles in the reactors?

The simple solutions aren't.


And sometimes the complicated solutions aren't needed... There's
probably two ways to solve this problem... One is to just nuke the
whole ****in' Middle East... The other is to make their product
virtually worthless... As enticing as the first method might be, I
would prefer the second so that they have longer to contemplate how
they screwed up... Hell, we can always go back to the first way...
  #7  
Old August 17th 06, 03:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
ktbr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

Grumman-581 wrote:
And sometimes the complicated solutions aren't needed... There's
probably two ways to solve this problem... One is to just nuke the
whole ****in' Middle East... The other is to make their product
virtually worthless... As enticing as the first method might be, I
would prefer the second so that they have longer to contemplate how
they screwed up... Hell, we can always go back to the first way...


Their product will never be worthless. Its energy potential as a
fuel not whithstanding, it will always been needed and desired
as a product for lubricants, plastics, medicines, a zillion
differnt chemicals and lots of other stuff.

Petroleum is also the most efficient way to power an engine for
aircraft for a number of reasons.... and especially small aircraft
because of their size and weight limitations.

Hydrogen/nuclear/solar/whatever powered aircraft may one day
be a reality... but long after these other technologies have
been successfully used in automobiles - why are by far the
largest mass consumers of petro fuels on the planet. In fact,
once petroleum is replaced in vehicles the proce of fuel
JET ot AVGAS will go down accordingly.
  #8  
Old August 16th 06, 10:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Floyd L. Davidson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

Grumman-581 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:40:25 GMT, Larry Dighera
wrote:
Perhaps 23,437.5 square miles, or an area 153 miles on a side, is
easier to visualize. :-)


In other words, a medium sized Texas ranch...


Or to be more to the point, about 1/10th the size of all of
little ol' Texas itself. Obviously there aren't any ranches in
Texas anything near that size. The 1002 Area of ANWR absolutely
dwarfs the largest ranch in Texas. It dwarfs at least the two
largest ranches *combined*. I didn't try to see, but it is possible
that all ranches in Texas put together might actually equal the size
of the 1002 Area in ANWR...

Somewhat larger than a few states. About the size of West
Virginia, and larger than 9 states to be specific.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
  #10  
Old August 17th 06, 12:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Floyd L. Davidson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Ethanol Powered Aircraft

Grumman-581 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:42:47 -0800, (Floyd L.
Davidson) wrote:
Or to be more to the point, about 1/10th the size of all of
little ol' Texas itself. Obviously there aren't any ranches in
Texas anything near that size. The 1002 Area of ANWR absolutely
dwarfs the largest ranch in Texas. It dwarfs at least the two
largest ranches *combined*. I didn't try to see, but it is possible
that all ranches in Texas put together might actually equal the size
of the 1002 Area in ANWR...


Awh 'ell, if ya gonna bring *facts* into this conversation, I'm not
playin' anymore... grin

Next ya gonna tell me that I can't propagate the Texas stereotypes...
Hell, you might even try to claim that someplace other than Texas
knows how to do *real* BBQ...


I wasn't going to tell any Texas jokes... really I wasn't.

I did visit Houston once, and rather liked it. Just like
Prudhoe Bay... except for all the Texans, that's some nice
country. We drove by the Museum of Texas History, and they told
me it was a great demonstration of everything good about Texas!
I asked the folks I was with if we could schedule at least half
an hour there the next day.

They asked why I'd want to see everything more than twice.

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.