![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fortunately for Garmin, if you want XM weather in a box, they are
currently the only show in town. vistanav also provides XM weather. It looks like a waaaay bigger bigger display, too. If you read my original posts, you'll know why I considered -- and rejected -- all the tablet-PC-based versions. Basically it came down to price for a flash-memory based system. $4K- $5K was just too much, and they were futzy. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Fortunately for Garmin, if you want XM weather in a box, they are currently the only show in town. vistanav also provides XM weather. It looks like a waaaay bigger bigger display, too. If you read my original posts, you'll know why I considered -- and rejected -- all the tablet-PC-based versions. well, I thought I did read them, but that was, what, four days ago. You expect me to remember that far back? :-) -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
If you set detail levels to so that Joliet doesn't disappear at that zoom level, you can't see it, cuz it's buried in too many airports. Would you like some cheese with that whine? Yes. For $3000, I should be able to demand any cheese I'd like. Face it -- Garmin just hasn't kept up with the competition in the crucial area of display design. Worse, the only work-around to using a too-small display -- slewing around -- doesn't work very well because of insufficient processing power. It's a design flaw. Fortunately for Garmin, if you want XM weather in a box, they are currently the only show in town. Yes, exactly. So they can extract whatever price we are willing to pay. We both voted with our wallets. When the competition comes out, Garmin will either adapt or die. Anyway, all designs are a compromise. Bigger displays demand more power, bigger batteries, shorter battery life, faster processors (which in turn demand more power...). A bigger display mounted on a yoke hides the instruments behind it. A bigger display increases manufacturing cost. It's all driven my the manufacturer's desire to maximize the bottom line, including his perception of customer demand. I think Garmin pretty much hit the sweet spot with this design, and I think that's been reinforced by their marketing susccess. You may disagree. OK. You're free to vote often with your wallet. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin GpsMap 396 - Flight Test #2 | Mike Spera | Owning | 17 | July 9th 06 01:21 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |