![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Capitalism is ruthlessly fair. It treats everyone the same, regardless of race, creed, or political affiliation. It is the ultimate democracy, and its basic rules are immutable. No, it is not. Capitalism is sort of mostly fair when it's practiced by equals. But capitalism makes some powerful and some not. The next generation inherets this, and at that point it becomes inherently unfair. Small companies are far more influenced by individuals than large ones. This allows large ones to get away with more. If they become large enough to become monopolistic and get away with it, the key has been thrown out. Large companies can purchase more votes than small ones, or individuals, and those votes keep them large and influential, despite any quality issues with their products. WalMart, with its decrees about RFID tags, may well be the biggest threat to privacy there is, but it is largely unstoppable because there is little of equivalent size with sufficient coherency to fight it. Nobody forces anybody to shop at Wal-Mart. If people are worried about their privacy, they can simply shop elsewhere. That will correct the problem quickly. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Capitalism is sort of mostly fair when it's practiced by equals. But capitalism makes some powerful and some not. The next generation inherets this, and at that point it becomes inherently unfair. Nothing in life guarantees you "fairness". Just exactly what is 'fair'? What you define or what Jay defines it as... or what the government defines it as... what how Fidel Castro defines it as? Sorry, but whenever someone intervenes into the 'fairness' game things go to hell. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote I'm up against it every day, in my business. Two days ago, a $60 million (that's not a typo) Marriott Hotel opened up less than 5 miles away -- and our phone stopped ringing. We went from having a gangbusters August, to being behind last year, in two days. The fact that this hotel was built entirely with taxpayer's money, by the City of Coralville, might surprise you. On the other hand, in a socialist area like the one I live in, this kind of thing happens all the time. (The University of Iowa has a government-built-and-owned hotel, the Iowa House. They also have a government-owned-and-operated daily newspaper, the Daily Iowan, that I used to compete against in my previous life.) You know, after reading your post an hour or so ago, I have gotten more and more ****ed-off. Since when does a government have the right to tinker in direct competition with the private sector? You need to get together with the Sheraton owners, and do some lobbying to get some kind of new law passed, or a new damages suite, or forcing the issue to the highest court, or something. I will be among the first to contribute to a legal defense fund, for *that* cause !!! Damn, just damn !!! -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Of course . . . there is always the message that capitalism needs to be reigned in lest it go crazy and crush the weak and weary. Well, I should think you'd want them taught "the facts of life". The final sentence above is pretty much an emperically proven fact, is it not? Capitalism is ruthlessly fair. It treats everyone the same, regardless of race, creed, or political affiliation. It is the ultimate democracy, and its basic rules are immutable. It isn't always fair, because not all of the information or costs are available. Is this fair? Will the Marriott kill us? Will we survive the next two years, between them and the new $80 million dollar casino hotel they're building just south of town? I have no idea -- but I'll keep swinging for the fences in the meantime. That's capitalism -- and I don't want my kids teachers sugar-coating it. All that will do is weaken them for their upcoming battle, in a field called "life". If the hotel was built with public funds, then this isn't capitalism. Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ktbr wrote:
Jay Honeck wrote: None the less, it seems we are running headlong toward the same end. The lure -- and illusory rewards -- of bribing us with our own money are far too great for any country to long resist. If you want to see America's future, all you need to do is visit any inner city convenience store that sells lottery tickets, right after the first of the month. It's really quiet pathetic... Exactly. And it is sad to say, but public (government) schools are doing a fine job of insuring new generations will go forth with limited understanding of the real power of economic freedom and just how precious it is to maintain. I have a public school education and you won't see me buying lottery tickets, or participating in any other kinds of bad economic decisions. Granted, I didn't learn anything until I got out of public high school. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flt. 800 Anniversay: Exploding Fuel Tanks STILL In Airline Planes!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 3 | July 24th 06 06:06 PM |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
Fuel Tanks C172 | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | May 2nd 06 05:45 AM |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |