![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:57:47 +0000, Mike Schumann wrote:
Why in the world would you leave a transponder off if you have the luxury of having one???? Transponder installations in gliders are not as reliable as we would like them to be. These are some of the reasons I know of for transponders not being operational in VFR airspace that I have experienced by myself or by other pilots I know personally: - Battery failed unexpectedly and no backup installed. - Battery failed unexpectedly and backup battery also failed unexpectedly. - Transponder display faulty and spares unavailable (a common problem with old Terra's). - Loose connection between the altitude encoder and transponder resulted in wild altitudes indications and ATC getting upset and requesting the pilot to switch off the transponder. ATC also not happy with pilot squawking mode A. - Antenna located a little too close to pilot for comfort and pilot elects to leave transponder switched off to protect the family jewels from radiation when not in controlled airspace. - Transponder operating but transmissions shielded by poorly located antenna. - Antenna damaged by earlier ground handling mishap and transponder switched off. - Transponder turned on but the pilot is unaware that it is non-functional because it has not been ground checked for a long time and the glider has not been in controlled airspace recently and hence the pilot has not had confirmation from ATC that they can see him. - Transponder is turned off because the pilot suspects it is not working but has not had a chance to get it checked either on the ground, or by talking to ATC. - Transponder removed for repairs and sent to repair facility and it takes many weeks to get it back. And a couple of other reasons reported on RAS: - Glider pilots requested to switch off transponders in certain areas after false TCAS warnings triggered at nearby airports. - Transponder set to squawk code that is filtered on ATC radar. (Please note, I don't fly in the USA, none of the above occurred in the USA so please don't quote me USA regulations.) From my experience, it is feasible to fit transponders in a few privately owned gliders for use during occasional flights in controlled airspace (or other airspace with active communication with ATC). However, it is not practical to equip an entire fleet of gliders with transponders, instruct the pilots to squawk "blind" and expect this to allow IFR traffic to be routed safely through the same airspace. This is a recipe for disaster. Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fred" wrote in message
ups.com... My fear, though, is that the talking heads who form much of Americans' opinions will start speaking out about the lack of sophisticated equipment on board the sailplane. You know the kind: "if that glider had an encoding transponder on it, this never would have happened." When you hear that, please point out to the speaker that the sailplane pilot was following all the regulations Here is a controversial part. While it's true that gliders are not required to have a transponder, and thus it's also true that "the sailplane pilot was following all the regulations", it's not the whole story. An argument can be made that this particular regulation, arbitrary as any other human-made law, might not be all that wise after all. This particular regulation, or lack of thereof, allows us to go up without a transponder and kill ourselves -- and possibly many others -- to our hearts' content. Does it mean that we should stand by this regulation as one of our "freedoms"? I honestly don't know. The law does not keep us from doing all the stupid things in the world -- common sense does. Sometimes, anyway. OTOH, I can't quite agree with the N.O.H. theory, either. It's a simple cost/benefit analysis. We don't have to accept all the risks as "normal" if we can mitigate some of it at a reasonable cost. It boils down to the definition of "reasonable", of course. So far, on the average, we as a community seem to perceive the risk as very low and the cost as "unreasonable". This Monday may have changed this proportion somewhat -- miraculously, without even great loss of life. Of course, in a perfect world where FAA was up-to-speed with technology and airlines considered their options carefully, we'd all be flying with low-power, low-cost ADS-B or FLARM-like devices since the beginning of the GPS era. In the real world, meanwhile, we have to fend for ourselves a little bit if we hope to survive. "The-law-says-we-are-right,-so-we-won't-lift-a-finger;-let-them-change-instead" kind of attitude is not very constructive and may not achieve too much good in this world where the money talks (but doesn't always think). -- Yuliy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
You don't have to have a transponder to get the controllers to know you are there. True, I'm not talking 'Flight Following' but more like 'Flight Awareness.' On occassions, I have called the local controllers for the Class C airport (RDU) and let them know I was there and was monitoring their frequency. They would first reply to 'Squak' such and such and I would tell them I didn't have a transponder. They would then find me on radar. Ok, maybe they aren't as busy as some other locations, but at least I make them aware that I'm out there. Occassionaly, they might call up and ask how I'm doing, and just being friendly. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 12:36 30 August 2006, Doug Haluza wrote: snoop wrote: The one item, I'm curious to hear about, if, this item, is on the Reno/Minden Jeppesen IFR charts. I know it's on the VFR sectionals, but is there a glider icon on the IFR charts in that region? Good point about getting the glider symbol on the IFR charts. Most jet jocks use these almost exclusively. The more we do to raise awareness the better. Another way to raise awareness of glider trafiic is to make Pireps. I try to do this at least once on every good soaring day, especially if there is wave. Report your aircraft type as simply a Glider (nobody else will know or care what make/model you are flying). You can just report clear and 50 mi visibility, or give detailed (and useful) info on cloud layers and winds aloft. Pireps get wide dissemination to pilots, ATC and dispatchers, so this is a good way to remind them that we are out there too. Glider pilots who also fly commercially will appreciate hearing your Pirep when they are working (try to make them as jealous as possible by reporting from the top of the climb!). You can give Pireps to Flight Watch on 122.0 MHz, or you can contact a FSS or ATC facility on a discrete frequency. Check the AIM for more info on Pireps. Another thing you can do is to get VFR flight following if you have a transponder. Again, just give your aircraft type as a Glider. This lets pilots and controllers in the section know we are out there. It also gets you a discrete transponder code. Most ATC sections filter out 1200 VFR codes, and only view aircraft with discrete codes. So in this case, even if the glider's transponder was on, there is no guarantee that the controller even saw it, much less gave a traffic warning--they are not required to warn IFR aircraft of VFR targets anyway. I know a lot of glider pilots like to stay out of the system. But out of sight is out of mind. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray: I like this. I have briefing pilots going north to call RNO
approach even though they plan to stay above the top of the Class C. I think I'll recommend more conversation with RNO approach, even if we're not heading north. Fred |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray Lovinggood wrote:
Doug, You don't have to have a transponder to get the controllers to know you are there. True, I'm not talking 'Flight Following' but more like 'Flight Awareness.' On occassions, I have called the local controllers for the Class C airport (RDU) and let them know I was there and was monitoring their frequency. They would first reply to 'Squak' such and such and I would tell them I didn't have a transponder. They would then find me on radar. Ok, maybe they aren't as busy as some other locations, but at least I make them aware that I'm out there. Occassionaly, they might call up and ask how I'm doing, and just being friendly. Chinook approach near our local airliner airport (PSC) responds the same way. The non-transponder equipped gliders often call them shortly after take-off, and they usually spot everyone until we leave on course. I assume Approach could be alerted at other airliner airports, too, and I think some of the guys do that, too. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can also ask for flight following without a transponder, but
primary echo's are not reliable. I have tried this in the past around the ISP Class-C. Even 10nm out, with a 20m Carbon wing, they couldn't see me on some headings. If you do call ATC without a transponder, the proper phraseology is to add "slant X-ray" after your call sign. The slant codes indicate equipment like transponder and DME, and "/X" means none. I've had controllers give me a squawk code anyway, because they may not be familiar with this one, but at least it makes you sound professional. If you have a Mode-C transponder only, the code is "slant Uniform. I am /U now, and I carry 2 x 13 Ah batteries that can run the transponder and everything else for over 12 hours. Ray Lovinggood wrote: Doug, You don't have to have a transponder to get the controllers to know you are there. True, I'm not talking 'Flight Following' but more like 'Flight Awareness.' On occassions, I have called the local controllers for the Class C airport (RDU) and let them know I was there and was monitoring their frequency. They would first reply to 'Squak' such and such and I would tell them I didn't have a transponder. They would then find me on radar. Ok, maybe they aren't as busy as some other locations, but at least I make them aware that I'm out there. Occassionaly, they might call up and ask how I'm doing, and just being friendly. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While you may be detected by ATC on primary without a transponder, you
wouldn't be detected by airliners and other aircrafts carrying TCAS and will not give traffic resolution. Another (secondary) reason to carry a transponder and leave it on, is that if, god forbidden, you go down in a remote area, replaying ATC tapes may help finding you. Ramy Ray Lovinggood wrote: Doug, You don't have to have a transponder to get the controllers to know you are there. True, I'm not talking 'Flight Following' but more like 'Flight Awareness.' On occassions, I have called the local controllers for the Class C airport (RDU) and let them know I was there and was monitoring their frequency. They would first reply to 'Squak' such and such and I would tell them I didn't have a transponder. They would then find me on radar. Ok, maybe they aren't as busy as some other locations, but at least I make them aware that I'm out there. Occassionaly, they might call up and ask how I'm doing, and just being friendly. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 12:36 30 August 2006, Doug Haluza wrote: snoop wrote: The one item, I'm curious to hear about, if, this item, is on the Reno/Minden Jeppesen IFR charts. I know it's on the VFR sectionals, but is there a glider icon on the IFR charts in that region? Good point about getting the glider symbol on the IFR charts. Most jet jocks use these almost exclusively. The more we do to raise awareness the better. Another way to raise awareness of glider trafiic is to make Pireps. I try to do this at least once on every good soaring day, especially if there is wave. Report your aircraft type as simply a Glider (nobody else will know or care what make/model you are flying). You can just report clear and 50 mi visibility, or give detailed (and useful) info on cloud layers and winds aloft. Pireps get wide dissemination to pilots, ATC and dispatchers, so this is a good way to remind them that we are out there too. Glider pilots who also fly commercially will appreciate hearing your Pirep when they are working (try to make them as jealous as possible by reporting from the top of the climb!). You can give Pireps to Flight Watch on 122.0 MHz, or you can contact a FSS or ATC facility on a discrete frequency. Check the AIM for more info on Pireps. Another thing you can do is to get VFR flight following if you have a transponder. Again, just give your aircraft type as a Glider. This lets pilots and controllers in the section know we are out there. It also gets you a discrete transponder code. Most ATC sections filter out 1200 VFR codes, and only view aircraft with discrete codes. So in this case, even if the glider's transponder was on, there is no guarantee that the controller even saw it, much less gave a traffic warning--they are not required to warn IFR aircraft of VFR targets anyway. I know a lot of glider pilots like to stay out of the system. But out of sight is out of mind. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ramy wrote:
While you may be detected by ATC on primary without a transponder, you wouldn't be detected by airliners and other aircrafts carrying TCAS and will not give traffic resolution. And you won't be detected by airplanes and gliders using a TPAS instrument. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Ramy wrote: While you may be detected by ATC on primary without a transponder, you wouldn't be detected by airliners and other aircrafts carrying TCAS and will not give traffic resolution. And you won't be detected by airplanes and gliders using a TPAS instrument. What is the difference between TCAS and TPAS? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TPAS is passive, it does not interrogate, as such much less accurate,
but fraction of the price of TCAS. You can find them under $500. Ramy Greg Arnold wrote: Eric Greenwell wrote: Ramy wrote: While you may be detected by ATC on primary without a transponder, you wouldn't be detected by airliners and other aircrafts carrying TCAS and will not give traffic resolution. And you won't be detected by airplanes and gliders using a TPAS instrument. What is the difference between TCAS and TPAS? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Minden Vote - Results | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | November 20th 05 06:01 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Minden In Two Weeks | ADP | Soaring | 3 | August 10th 04 01:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |