![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: Can European airspace possibly be more congested than that in the US, say Chicago or Los Angeles? Enroute? yeah, I think so. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Bob Noel schrieb: I know the advantages from an ATC POV, but what is the advantage for the aircraft owner? To be allowed to fly in controlled airspace at all? In Europe, Mode S will be mandated, because ATC claims Mode C reaches its limits. This means in the forseeable futu No Mode S, no fly in controlled airspace. Stefan We will see. Such a mandate will meet considerable opposition. Same as GA user fees. Heck, the FAA has not even started any sort of 406 MHh ELT mandate to my knowledge. (USA applicability) Ron Lee |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
We will see. Such a mandate will meet considerable opposition. Not in Europe. We have seen, here. It has met considerable opposition - and has been mandated nonetheless. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stefan wrote: I know the advantages from an ATC POV, but what is the advantage for the aircraft owner? To be allowed to fly in controlled airspace at all? In Europe, Mode S will be mandated, because ATC claims Mode C reaches its limits. This means in the forseeable futu No Mode S, no fly in controlled airspace. Sorry. I should have clarified that my question was applicable to the US NAS. I do understand the European requirements for Mode S, 8.33, ACAS, etc etc. But in the US, Mode S is still just a solution looking for a problem. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Manes" wrote FSM where I'mbased had TIS for the first year after I installed the Garmin but theyupgraded the radar (to ASR 11, I believe) and are not going to turn TIS onfor whatever reason.MarkN28409WC5I"Andrew Gideon" wrote in messagenews ![]() 29 Aug 2006 23:34:27 -0400, Doug Vetter wrote: The FAA is continuing to invest in Mode-S radars (the ASR-11 is replacing the ASR 7, 8, and 9 units that currently support TIS), so an investmentin the airborne component is still a wise move and will be for MANY years. Aside from TIS, what is the benefit (either to the pilot or ATC) of modeS? - Andrew Dood, buy a space, or sumpthin' ! g -- Jim in NC |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
18 Oct 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 19th 05 02:19 AM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |