A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

It figures....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 11th 06, 12:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default It figures....

Was the driver from Mexico? Maybe he couldn't read the
instructions?


It's funny that you ask, but the paver's work crew appeared to be
all-Mexican. (Although this was apparently NOT the paver's truck
driver that hit the hangar.)

And, yes, their insurance will pay to have the hangar repaired.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #2  
Old September 11th 06, 06:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default It figures....

("Jay Honeck" wrote)
Was the driver from Mexico? Maybe he couldn't read the instructions?


It's funny that you ask, but the paver's work crew appeared to be
all-Mexican. (Although this was apparently NOT the paver's truck driver
that hit the hangar.)



Paver's dump trucks had very clean, all white boxes - he said they're clean
because, 'he wants to keep up his company's image'


Montblack
"Captain, the irony meter can't take much more of this!"

  #3  
Old September 10th 06, 06:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default It figures....


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message

But, still, it's ridiculous. I mean, how in hell do you back a semi
into a BUILDING? I mean, it's a BIG building, with 16 T-hangars.
It's not like it jumped out in front of the guy.

I drove trucks for five years in high school/college, (admittedly not
semi trucks), and was always amazed at the number of backing accidents.
All ya gotta do is LOOK, for criminies sake...


Looking is one thing. Understanding and reacting to what you're seeing is
quite another. If you don't have the depth perception and judgement to know
what you're seeing, all the looking in the world won't prevent accidents of
this type.

You can see the same thing and it's opposite every day in shopping center
parking lots. A person will be making a sharp turn in the process of
leaving a parking space: head canted upward in the strange belief that
this somehow enhances the view, slowly ceeping through the turn while
carefully looking, hoping for no contact, while in fact there is a 5 or 6
foot gap between the subject and object vehicles. Most people have no idea
where their corners are, and I suspect that includes a large number of
locally hired truck drivers.


  #4  
Old September 11th 06, 05:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default It figures....

If you don't have the depth perception and judgement to know
what you're seeing, all the looking in the world won't prevent accidents of
this type.


Is somebody going to tell me now that a deer was driving?

Jose
--
There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #5  
Old September 11th 06, 06:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default It figures....

("Jose" wrote)
Is somebody going to tell me now that a deer was driving?



We thought that part was obvious.

....since the hangar wasn't moving.


Montblack
  #6  
Old September 11th 06, 03:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default It figures....


"Jose" wrote in message news:J95Ng.322

Is somebody going to tell me now that a deer was driving?


What relevance does that comment have? Could you clarify?


  #7  
Old September 10th 06, 08:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default It figures....

In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

But, still, it's ridiculous. I mean, how in hell do you back a semi
into a BUILDING?


Well, he probably had to swerve several times...

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #8  
Old September 10th 06, 08:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stubby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default It figures....

Bob Noel wrote:
In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

But, still, it's ridiculous. I mean, how in hell do you back a semi
into a BUILDING?


Well, he probably had to swerve several times...

Years ago an acquaintance was studying to become a mechanical engineer
and needed a thesis topic. He decided to look into why the standard
design for a loading dock was something like "do the design, compute all
the loads for the largest shipments, the weight of forklifts, etc AND
THEN MULTIPLY ALL THE SUPPORT SIZES BY 4." This was uniformly accepted
as safe practice.

It was true. Anything less would crumble within a short time. The
answer was that trucks would back into the docks.
  #9  
Old September 10th 06, 11:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Burns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 259
Default It figures....

You should see the spots in our asphalt where drivers, once backed up to the
dock, will continue to push the accelerator rather than floating the clutch
and applying the brakes... 3-4" deep gouges in the asphalt from the drive
tires spinning. Then there are those that actual back into the dock and
bounce off... unreal.

Years of experience around guys like these prove how inexpensive
overbuilding and using lots of steel and concrete is compared to repairing
buildings.

Jim

"Stubby" wrote in message
. ..
Bob Noel wrote:
In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

But, still, it's ridiculous. I mean, how in hell do you back a semi
into a BUILDING?


Well, he probably had to swerve several times...

Years ago an acquaintance was studying to become a mechanical engineer and
needed a thesis topic. He decided to look into why the standard design
for a loading dock was something like "do the design, compute all the
loads for the largest shipments, the weight of forklifts, etc AND THEN
MULTIPLY ALL THE SUPPORT SIZES BY 4." This was uniformly accepted as safe
practice.

It was true. Anything less would crumble within a short time. The
answer was that trucks would back into the docks.



  #10  
Old September 11th 06, 07:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default It figures....


Jay Honeck wrote:
y.

I drove trucks for five years in high school/college, (admittedly not
semi trucks), and was always amazed at the number of backing accidents.
All ya gotta do is LOOK, for criminies sake...

Maybe the driver needs one of these to avoid hitting buildings:
http://www.preco.com/PreView/index.htm

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Figures on Light Sport Pilots AJ Piloting 4 April 25th 06 04:45 AM
A36 performance Figures Anthony Acri Instrument Flight Rules 2 December 1st 04 07:55 PM
A36 performance Figures Anthony Acri Instrument Flight Rules 1 November 29th 04 05:19 AM
A36 performance Figures Anthony Acri Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 29th 04 03:22 AM
America's Hundred Thousand Production Totals Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 11 May 28th 04 10:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.