A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 06, 08:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Marty Shapiro
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 287
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

"Skylune" wrote in
lkaboutaviation.com:

Now that I have again provided the amount of annual funding deriving
from GA fuel taxes (including AV GAS and Jet A), compare that to 2005
capital grants to airports by looking at the ACTUAL 2005 DATA below.
(Note that these figures DO NOT include the $150K annual operating
subsidy that many GA airports receive.)

DAMN: the subsidies are enormous, as every informed person knows....

http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff..._histories/med
ia/grants_2005.pdf




A quick look at this report for airports I'm personally familiar with
shows that you have no comprehension whatsoever of what you are talking
about.

Several of the airports listed as GA are served by air freight
carriers such as FedEx, which operate under Part 91, which governs GA.

One interesting entry is for Moffett Field, formerly a Navy base. It
is listed as GA but it is not open to the public. It's use is pretty much
NASA and air freight from Lockheed. When POTUS comes to the area, it is
used by Air Force One.

Sacramento Mather, formerly an Air Force base, listed as R, is where
air freight to the Sacremento area was moved to from Sacramento
International.

Other "GA" airports receiving grants are CDF (California Department of
Forestry) fire bomber bases.

Many of the environmental studies being funded by the AIP grants are
mandated by the federal government.

--
Marty Shapiro
Silicon Rallye Inc.

(remove SPAMNOT to email me)
  #2  
Old September 15th 06, 10:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 824
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wrote:

Now that I have again provided the amount of annual funding deriving from
GA fuel taxes (including AV GAS and Jet A), compare that to 2005 capital
grants to airports by looking at the ACTUAL 2005 DATA below. (Note that
these figures DO NOT include the $150K annual operating subsidy that many
GA airports receive.)

DAMN: the subsidies are enormous, as every informed person knows....

http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff...ies/media/gran
ts_2005.pdf


Why single out GA in the first place? What about subsidies for bicycle
lanes? When the Dumbarton Bridge was built across San Francisco Bay,
they spent $4 million to install bicycle lanes, which may get two or
three bicycles a week using them.

Tell you what, Loon: Cut out all the rest of the "unnecessary"
subsidies, then let's talk about GA subsidies.
  #3  
Old September 16th 06, 01:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Orval Fairbairn wrote in
news
In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wrote:

Now that I have again provided the amount of annual funding deriving
from GA fuel taxes (including AV GAS and Jet A), compare that to 2005
capital grants to airports by looking at the ACTUAL 2005 DATA below.
(Note that these figures DO NOT include the $150K annual operating
subsidy that many GA airports receive.)

DAMN: the subsidies are enormous, as every informed person knows....

http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff...histories/medi
a/gran ts_2005.pdf


Why single out GA in the first place? What about subsidies for bicycle
lanes? When the Dumbarton Bridge was built across San Francisco Bay,
they spent $4 million to install bicycle lanes, which may get two or
three bicycles a week using them.

Tell you what, Loon: Cut out all the rest of the "unnecessary"
subsidies, then let's talk about GA subsidies.


Why stop at transportation?

Perhaps we should have User Fees for the Welfare system?
  #4  
Old September 16th 06, 01:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 632
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Judah wrote:
snip

Why stop at transportation?

Perhaps we should have User Fees for the Welfare system?


You're forgetting, the poor people who use welfare can't help
themselves, whereas we pilots are filthy rich and can pay.

You know, I really wonder why someone which such hatred for GA posts in
a group like this.
  #5  
Old September 16th 06, 02:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

In article ,
Emily wrote:

You know, I really wonder why someone which such hatred for GA posts in
a group like this.


(Not sniping at Emily) why do people insist on feeding the trolls?

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #6  
Old September 16th 06, 02:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 632
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Bob Noel wrote:
In article ,
Emily wrote:

You know, I really wonder why someone which such hatred for GA posts in
a group like this.


(Not sniping at Emily) why do people insist on feeding the trolls?


Alright, hand's been slapped, thread's been killed....
  #7  
Old September 16th 06, 02:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Bob Noel wrote:
(Not sniping at Emily) why do people insist on feeding the trolls?


The issue is relevant to this newsgroup and, IMHO, worth discussing[*]. The
information needed to support or refute skylune's assertions appear to be
available. I found it worthwhile and educational to track down facts to see
what the situation really is (and discovered it's complicated!)
[*] Unlike Jay Honeck's Arizona voter ID law thread, which you have even
responded to, but is, IMHO, technically trolling. I objected to that thread
but not this one....
  #8  
Old September 16th 06, 02:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Emily wrote:

Judah wrote:
snip


Why stop at transportation?
Perhaps we should have User Fees for the Welfare system?



You're forgetting, the poor people who use welfare can't help
themselves, whereas we pilots are filthy rich and can pay.

You know, I really wonder why someone which such hatred for GA posts in
a group like this.


Because people like that tend to live miserable lives of isolation as
they have no friends. Any attention is better than no attention, hence
the posts here.

Matt
  #9  
Old September 16th 06, 01:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 678
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE


"Matt Whiting" wrote:

Any attention is better than no attention,


The motto on every troll's wall.


  #10  
Old September 16th 06, 01:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Impact and wear due to heavy vehicles is DRAMATICALLY caused almost
exclusively by the heavy vehicles. If it was just cars on the road, the
damage to the road due to cars would be miniscule. It all comes from
heavy trucks and busses.

Much the same is true with runways and planes. The heavy planes do most
of the damage and require strong expensive runways. Light GA planes do
not need much in the way of pavement reinforcement.

For that matter most light GA aircraft don't need towers.

Still the guy has a point. The small, strickly GA airports get
subsidized. Having an airport is a point of pride in a community and
there is a safety aspect so far as medical transport goes. But maybe
raising the aviation fuel tax would be appropriate here, trying to get
GA to pay it's way.

There is a LOT of pork in almost all aspects of our economy. It's
downright scary. GA is getting govt subsidy, that is true.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The MYTT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine Harbin Home Built 19 June 4th 06 07:06 PM
fuel subsidies for Angle Flight pilots sashley Piloting 17 September 11th 05 09:25 AM
Spark plug question: Massive electrode or fine wire? Peter R. Owning 9 February 4th 05 02:03 AM
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes WalterM140 Military Aviation 428 July 1st 04 11:16 PM
Massive Israeli Flyover, Possible Trouble Nov 21 robert arndt Military Aviation 8 November 20th 03 04:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.