![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again. Are there any links to the price of the new engine and the specification differences between the old O-200 that I fly with and would like to replace and the new O-200 LSA engine? I spent an hour probing the TCM website and found nothing. when did they put this little masterpiece back into production? Stealth Pilot Australia I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:45:24 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote: I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds. All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year. There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks. Peter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:21:46 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote: I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds. All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year. There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks. Peter appreciate the details pete. calls from australia into america are problematic. most americans take ages to attune the ear to the australian accent. 170 lbs is the bare dry engine. 200lbs is with accessories and oil ready to run. Stealth Pilot |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Dohm" wrote in
: I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds. All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year. There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks. Peter Jabiru 3300... 170lbs complete, LSA certified. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds. All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year. There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks. Peter Jabiru 3300... 170lbs complete, LSA certified. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams Agreed, and it is also inherently very smooth, has a low frontal area, and rivals most models of the Lycoming O-235 for maximum power--although that last is subject to a lot of variables due to propeller disk area and may have a different safety margin. A local chapter member has one in a Sonex and it fits that airframe like a hand in a perfectly fitted glove. It also ranks high amoung the engines that I like personally for some airframes, but there are caveats. It appears that some LSA aircraft may also be flown night and IFR, in US airspace, limited by the lesser of the pilot qualitications and the aircraft operating limitations. If you're curious, start with a look at http://www.newplane.com/amd/amd/601_SLSA/LSA_rule.html and http://www.sportpilot.org/news/051013_ifr.html and also try a Google search using the argument "FAA Part 33 LSA" but without the quatation marks. Peter I know that "LSA aircraft" reads like something from The Department of Redundancy Department, but couldn't decide how else to write it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Dohm wrote: I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. Sounds like the cylinders are similar to the IO-240 and the 6-cylinder IO-360, which are cross-flow engines. Which bore? I'm in agreement with you that an engine with these numbers is a winner, except that what with the high prices of the experimental IO-240 and the experimental O-200, one would expect the IO-200 to bear a hefty price-tag. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ps.com... Peter Dohm wrote: I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new manufacture again. I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I do plan to follow up. Peter I thank you for passing on the info. best news since christmas. Stealth Pilot I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that: 1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new. 2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and Planned to be available some time next year Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33 Has a target weight under 200 pounds Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours Other improvements should include crossflow heads, revised oil sump, and electronic ignition. Sounds like the cylinders are similar to the IO-240 and the 6-cylinder IO-360, which are cross-flow engines. Which bore? I'm in agreement with you that an engine with these numbers is a winner, except that what with the high prices of the experimental IO-240 and the experimental O-200, one would expect the IO-200 to bear a hefty price-tag. That's how it sounds to me as well, and I do expect that hefty price tag. With the aid of a Google search, I was able to find a list of partial specs at http://www.tcmlink.com/producthighlights/ENGTBL.PDF which shows all of the older engine sizes O-200 through IO-360 having the same stroke, with the O-200 and O-300 having a smaller bore. Therefore, the bore and stroke of the O-200 and O-300 makes the most sense; and even suggests the possibility of an IO-300 in the future. (Remember that you read it here first.) BTW, I forgot to mention in the earlier post that I was also told that they are designing a new oil sump integral with the crank case. The O-300 has had that forever and it does facititate a very sleek cowling. There is a good justification for an FAR Part 33 certified engine and FAR Part 35 certified propeller in that, as I understand it, an appropriately equipped LSA can have Night and IFR within its operating limitations when flown by a qualified pilot and can still be flown Day VFR by a Sport Pilot. Peter |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hard Starting Cold Continental Engines | M.E. Borner | Owning | 16 | December 6th 05 04:13 AM |
Continental IO-520A operating data? | Michael | Owning | 7 | November 26th 04 08:38 PM |
Continental A65-8 engines on EBAY | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 16th 04 04:30 AM |
Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article | John B. | Piloting | 40 | October 21st 03 04:07 PM |
Continental IO-360 question | Jeff P | Owning | 0 | September 21st 03 08:03 PM |