A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Continental O-200 ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 17th 06, 10:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Continental O-200 ?

I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.

Are there any links to the price of the new engine and the
specification differences between the old O-200 that I fly with and
would like to replace and the new O-200 LSA engine?

I spent an hour probing the TCM website and found nothing.

when did they put this little masterpiece back into production?

Stealth Pilot
Australia


I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I
do plan to follow up.

Peter


  #2  
Old September 18th 06, 11:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stealth Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default Continental O-200 ?

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:45:24 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote:

I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot
  #3  
Old September 20th 06, 01:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Continental O-200 ?


I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and

I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking
through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.

At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way
of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan
to display at shows as the development proceeds.

All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a
project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year.

There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete
on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had
seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight
for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing
sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks.

Peter


  #4  
Old September 20th 06, 11:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stealth Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default Continental O-200 ?

On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:21:46 -0400, "Peter Dohm"
wrote:


I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and

I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking
through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.

At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in the way
of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person and they plan
to display at shows as the development proceeds.

All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a
project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a year.

There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really compete
on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I thought that I had
seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is still the lowest weight
for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would trust over terrain containing
sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks.

Peter


appreciate the details pete.
calls from australia into america are problematic. most americans take
ages to attune the ear to the australian accent.

170 lbs is the bare dry engine. 200lbs is with accessories and oil
ready to run.
Stealth Pilot

  #5  
Old September 20th 06, 02:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61
Default Continental O-200 ?

"Peter Dohm" wrote in
:


I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in
new manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They
have a phone number posted for additional information on each
engine/series and

I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by
clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and
learned that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.

At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in
the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person
and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds.

All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a
project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a
year.

There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really
compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I
thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is
still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would
trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks.

Peter



Jabiru 3300... 170lbs complete, LSA certified.

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
  #6  
Old September 20th 06, 04:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Continental O-200 ?


I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in
new manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They
have a phone number posted for additional information on each
engine/series and

I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by
clicking through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and
learned that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.

At present, they really don't have much posted on their web site in
the way of specifications, but a phone call will reach a live person
and they plan to display at shows as the development proceeds.

All in all, I am very impressed, and the time frame is perfoect for a
project that I really can not even start for at least six months to a
year.

There is just nothing else that I can do that I believe can really
compete on both weight and reliability. I can not find where I
thought that I had seen a weight of 170 pounds, but even 200 pounds is
still the lowest weight for 100 horsepower that I know of that I would
trust over terrain containing sharks, alligators, or jagged rocks.

Peter



Jabiru 3300... 170lbs complete, LSA certified.

--
-- ET :-)

"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams


Agreed, and it is also inherently very smooth, has a low frontal area, and
rivals most models of the Lycoming O-235 for maximum power--although that
last is subject to a lot of variables due to propeller disk area and may
have a different safety margin. A local chapter member has one in a Sonex
and it fits that airframe like a hand in a perfectly fitted glove. It also
ranks high amoung the engines that I like personally for some airframes, but
there are caveats. It appears that some LSA aircraft may also be flown
night and IFR, in US airspace, limited by the lesser of the pilot
qualitications and the aircraft operating limitations. If you're curious,
start with a look at http://www.newplane.com/amd/amd/601_SLSA/LSA_rule.html
and http://www.sportpilot.org/news/051013_ifr.html and also try a Google
search using the argument "FAA Part 33 LSA" but without the quatation marks.

Peter

I know that "LSA aircraft" reads like something from The Department of
Redundancy Department, but couldn't decide how else to write it.


  #7  
Old September 22nd 06, 02:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Continental O-200 ?


Peter Dohm wrote:

I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series and

I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by clicking
through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.


Sounds like the cylinders are similar to the IO-240 and the 6-cylinder
IO-360, which are cross-flow engines. Which bore?
I'm in agreement with you that an engine with these numbers is a
winner, except that what with the high prices of the experimental
IO-240 and the experimental O-200, one would expect the IO-200 to bear
a hefty price-tag.

  #8  
Old September 22nd 06, 04:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Continental O-200 ?


wrote in message
ps.com...

Peter Dohm wrote:

I noticed in another post that the Continental O-200 is back in new
manufacture again.




I was the OP, and now see that I can't seem find any specs. They

have a
phone number posted for additional information on each engine/series

and
I
do plan to follow up.

Peter

I thank you for passing on the info.
best news since christmas.
Stealth Pilot


I gave them a call today at the number shown on their web site by

clicking
through to http://tcmlink.com/engines/index.cfm?lsa=yes and learned

that:

1) The "old" O-200 is still in production and still available new.

2) The new engine is expected to be called IO-200, and
Planned to be available some time next year
Planned to be certified for LSA under FAR Part 33
Has a target weight under 200 pounds
Has a terget TBO of 2000 hours
Other improvements should include crossflow heads,
revised oil sump, and electronic ignition.


Sounds like the cylinders are similar to the IO-240 and the 6-cylinder
IO-360, which are cross-flow engines. Which bore?
I'm in agreement with you that an engine with these numbers is a
winner, except that what with the high prices of the experimental
IO-240 and the experimental O-200, one would expect the IO-200 to bear
a hefty price-tag.

That's how it sounds to me as well, and I do expect that hefty price tag.

With the aid of a Google search, I was able to find a list of partial specs
at http://www.tcmlink.com/producthighlights/ENGTBL.PDF which shows all of
the older engine sizes O-200 through IO-360 having the same stroke, with the
O-200 and O-300 having a smaller bore. Therefore, the bore and stroke of
the O-200 and O-300 makes the most sense; and even suggests the possibility
of an IO-300 in the future. (Remember that you read it here first.)

BTW, I forgot to mention in the earlier post that I was also told that they
are designing a new oil sump integral with the crank case. The O-300 has
had that forever and it does facititate a very sleek cowling.

There is a good justification for an FAR Part 33 certified engine and FAR
Part 35 certified propeller in that, as I understand it, an appropriately
equipped LSA can have Night and IFR within its operating limitations when
flown by a qualified pilot and can still be flown Day VFR by a Sport Pilot.

Peter


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hard Starting Cold Continental Engines M.E. Borner Owning 16 December 6th 05 04:13 AM
Continental IO-520A operating data? Michael Owning 7 November 26th 04 08:38 PM
Continental A65-8 engines on EBAY [email protected] Aviation Marketplace 0 November 16th 04 04:30 AM
Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article John B. Piloting 40 October 21st 03 04:07 PM
Continental IO-360 question Jeff P Owning 0 September 21st 03 08:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.