![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
They *are* openly slandering their *employer* Are you able to provide some examples of the "slander" you mention? Well, let's start by assigning cutesy, disrespectiful names to the company CEO on a blog site. Is that slander? No, I suppose legally it is not. It IS insubordination, Insubordination is refusing to obey orders. No one ever said you can't make fun of your CEO. Ours has really bad hair, and we all know it and have made comments. It doesn't mean we deserve to be fired. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emily" wrote in message . .. Jay Honeck wrote: They *are* openly slandering their *employer* Are you able to provide some examples of the "slander" you mention? Well, let's start by assigning cutesy, disrespectiful names to the company CEO on a blog site. Is that slander? No, I suppose legally it is not. It IS insubordination, Insubordination is refusing to obey orders. No one ever said you can't make fun of your CEO. Ours has really bad hair, and we all know it and have made comments. It doesn't mean we deserve to be fired. If there is a corporate policy against such comments you could be terminated. It also falls under harassment which is certainly a hot button of recent years. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com... Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees' right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions are. They're not criticizing the "government" -- that is every Amercan's right. They *are* openly slandering their *employer* Their employer *is* the government. (And there's nothing resembling slander here.) --Gary |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary Drescher" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees' right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions are. They're not criticizing the "government" -- that is every Amercan's right. They *are* openly slandering their *employer* Their employer *is* the government. (And there's nothing resembling slander here.) --Gary I think slander is the wrong word. But how about insubordination? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the things that makes this country a Great Country (I guess I am sort of patriotic) is the freedoms that we have. I am greatly disturbed when they are taken from us, and even more disturbed when we willingly give them up. There are many freedoms here, and most people don't use most of them. That's ok. There are many freedoms I don't use, and the freedom to say "yes" is meaningless without the freedom to say "no". But even if I say "no", I value the freedom to say "yes".
That is fundamental. Imagine -- they've got a current employee, on staff, who runs a website solely for the purposes of impugning his employer! Imagine that. I have no quarrel with my employer (after all, I'm self employed), so if the freedom to impunge my employer were taken away from me, it wouldn't affect my daily life. But I think it's an important freedom, and part of what makes this country great. And what a fool. He has neatly and succinctly documented his own insubordination. Imagine that. In this country, we are free to be stupid, in the eyes of others. and publishing it worldwide? I was taught in grade school history that the Constitution of the United States says we can do exactly that. Thousands of people died in order to preserve this freedom, and it is irrespective of whether or not you agree with what is being published. Imagine that. We can actually =publish= stupid things! And get away with it! My respect for controllers could not have been more diminished. Your respect for controllers must have been very thin indeed. I've never seen an organization with a more self-destructive workforce in my life If the FAA operates with a staff as small as that documented on the website, maybe I should be worried. OTOH, if those individuals are the entirety of our national airspace control system, and they can actually make it work all by themselves.... gee, I'd double their pay and let them work naked with a chicken if they wanted to. I have a suspicion however that what you are seeing is the personal opinion of a handful of people. Hardly something that I'd get my knickers in a twit about. If any further evidence of the need to privatize the FAA is necessary, I will be very surprised. I really don't see the connection at all. A privatized FAA will in short order mean user fees for all small aircraft. In exchange, we might be granted the privilage of being worked by controllers who wear a suit and tie. Frankly, when I'm in an airplane, I don't see any reason to care what the controllers are wearing. I =do= see a reason to care whether or not they are happy working there. If they are not happy working there, I expect I will hear more of "Four two Victor, break off your practice approach at one thousand five hundred"... which of course makes the approach useless for currency or competence. I never had any reason to disrespect the individuals who made up the FAA. To a man, they've always been smart, kind, and professional. They are the same people you've always been dealing with. You can either change your opinion of the people, or change your opinion of what constitutes "smart, kind, and professional". I'd actually reccomend you consider the latter. Jose -- There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... One of the things that makes this country a Great Country (I guess I am sort of patriotic) is the freedoms that we have. I am greatly disturbed when they are taken from us, and even more disturbed when we willingly give them up. There are many freedoms here, and most people don't use most of them. That's ok. There are many freedoms I don't use, and the freedom to say "yes" is meaningless without the freedom to say "no". But even if I say "no", I value the freedom to say "yes". That is fundamental. Imagine -- they've got a current employee, on staff, who runs a website solely for the purposes of impugning his employer! Imagine that. I have no quarrel with my employer (after all, I'm self employed), so if the freedom to impunge my employer were taken away from me, it wouldn't affect my daily life. But I think it's an important freedom, and part of what makes this country great. In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for immediate termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as you have described it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he
rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some egomaniacal twit with a tie. Employers that make being a yes man a requirement for employment need to be terminated. mike "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for immediate termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as you have described it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike regish" wrote in message ... That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some egomaniacal twit with a tie. And what forces the employee to stay? You need only to look in a mirror to see the twit. Employers that make being a yes man a requirement for employment need to be terminated. Nobody said anything about a yes man. You present the typical twisted union attitude. mike "Dave Stadt" wrote in message ... In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for immediate termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as you have described it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he
rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some egomaniacal twit with a tie. Mike, instead of cowering behind your union, you need to get out in front of the curve, and really hang it out as the boss of your own business. Maybe come up with a new way to make a better widget, and set the world on fire. Really be a man, take some real risks, and face the realities of the modern business world unprotected by union rules that allow you to remain employed despite hating everything and everyone around you. Maybe it's time for you to see what it's like to trust your future and your family's good fortune to employees that might care as little about your company as you obviously do. It'll be an enlightening experience, I assure you. I think you've got the makings of a good entrepreneur. You've certainly got the attitude. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I so know where you are coming from but it's so narrow minded. Why not
accept graciously that some people are bosses, some are workers, some are artists, and some are priests. If everyone measured their self worth on the same scale, this would be a pretty sad and boring life. It takes a village. I enjoy living in it. Jay Honeck wrote: That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some egomaniacal twit with a tie. Mike, instead of cowering behind your union, you need to get out in front of the curve, and really hang it out as the boss of your own business. Maybe come up with a new way to make a better widget, and set the world on fire. Really be a man, take some real risks, and face the realities of the modern business world unprotected by union rules that allow you to remain employed despite hating everything and everyone around you. Maybe it's time for you to see what it's like to trust your future and your family's good fortune to employees that might care as little about your company as you obviously do. It'll be an enlightening experience, I assure you. I think you've got the makings of a good entrepreneur. You've certainly got the attitude. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Run up for plug clearing | Roger Long | Piloting | 78 | October 18th 04 03:39 AM |
Winscore source code now available | Guy Byars | Soaring | 0 | February 5th 04 10:43 AM |
Need Help with Northstar M1 Loran | Jerald Malin | Owning | 4 | December 8th 03 05:38 PM |