A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dress Code



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 06, 03:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 632
Default Dress Code

Jay Honeck wrote:
They *are* openly slandering their *employer*

Are you able to provide some examples of the "slander" you mention?


Well, let's start by assigning cutesy, disrespectiful names to the
company CEO on a blog site.

Is that slander? No, I suppose legally it is not. It IS
insubordination,


Insubordination is refusing to obey orders. No one ever said you can't
make fun of your CEO. Ours has really bad hair, and we all know it and
have made comments. It doesn't mean we deserve to be fired.

  #2  
Old September 21st 06, 05:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Dress Code


"Emily" wrote in message
. ..
Jay Honeck wrote:
They *are* openly slandering their *employer*
Are you able to provide some examples of the "slander" you mention?


Well, let's start by assigning cutesy, disrespectiful names to the
company CEO on a blog site.

Is that slander? No, I suppose legally it is not. It IS
insubordination,


Insubordination is refusing to obey orders. No one ever said you can't
make fun of your CEO. Ours has really bad hair, and we all know it and
have made comments. It doesn't mean we deserve to be fired.


If there is a corporate policy against such comments you could be
terminated. It also falls under harassment which is certainly a hot button
of recent years.


  #3  
Old September 20th 06, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Dress Code

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees'
right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions
are.


They're not criticizing the "government" -- that is every Amercan's
right. They *are* openly slandering their *employer*


Their employer *is* the government. (And there's nothing resembling slander
here.)

--Gary


  #4  
Old September 20th 06, 10:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default Dress Code


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees'
right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions
are.


They're not criticizing the "government" -- that is every Amercan's
right. They *are* openly slandering their *employer*


Their employer *is* the government. (And there's nothing resembling
slander here.)

--Gary



I think slander is the wrong word. But how about insubordination?


  #5  
Old September 21st 06, 12:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default Dress Code

One of the things that makes this country a Great Country (I guess I am sort of patriotic) is the freedoms that we have. I am greatly disturbed when they are taken from us, and even more disturbed when we willingly give them up. There are many freedoms here, and most people don't use most of them. That's ok. There are many freedoms I don't use, and the freedom to say "yes" is meaningless without the freedom to say "no". But even if I say "no", I value the freedom to say "yes".

That is fundamental.

Imagine -- they've got a current employee,
on staff, who runs a website solely for the
purposes of impugning his employer!


Imagine that.

I have no quarrel with my employer (after all, I'm self employed), so if the freedom to impunge my employer were taken away from me, it wouldn't affect my daily life. But I think it's an important freedom, and part of what makes this country great.

And what a fool. He has neatly and succinctly documented his own
insubordination.


Imagine that. In this country, we are free to be stupid, in the eyes of others.

and publishing it worldwide?


I was taught in grade school history that the Constitution of the United States says we can do exactly that. Thousands of people died in order to preserve this freedom, and it is irrespective of whether or not you agree with what is being published. Imagine that. We can actually =publish= stupid things! And get away with it!

My respect for controllers could not have been more diminished.


Your respect for controllers must have been very thin indeed.

I've never seen an organization with a more
self-destructive workforce in my life


If the FAA operates with a staff as small as that documented on the website, maybe I should be worried. OTOH, if those individuals are the entirety of our national airspace control system, and they can actually make it work all by themselves.... gee, I'd double their pay and let them work naked with a chicken if they wanted to.

I have a suspicion however that what you are seeing is the personal opinion of a handful of people. Hardly something that I'd get my knickers in a twit about.

If any further evidence of the need to
privatize the FAA is necessary, I will be very surprised.


I really don't see the connection at all. A privatized FAA will in short order mean user fees for all small aircraft. In exchange, we might be granted the privilage of being worked by controllers who wear a suit and tie. Frankly, when I'm in an airplane, I don't see any reason to care what the controllers are wearing. I =do= see a reason to care whether or not they are happy working there. If they are not happy working there, I expect I will hear more of "Four two Victor, break off your practice approach at one thousand five hundred"... which of course makes the approach useless for currency or competence.

I never had any reason to disrespect
the individuals who made up the FAA. To
a man, they've always been
smart, kind, and professional.


They are the same people you've always been dealing with. You can either change your opinion of the people, or change your opinion of what constitutes "smart, kind, and professional". I'd actually reccomend you consider the latter.

Jose
--
There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #6  
Old September 21st 06, 01:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Dress Code


"Jose" wrote in message
...
One of the things that makes this country a Great Country (I guess I am
sort of patriotic) is the freedoms that we have. I am greatly disturbed
when they are taken from us, and even more disturbed when we willingly
give them up. There are many freedoms here, and most people don't use
most of them. That's ok. There are many freedoms I don't use, and the
freedom to say "yes" is meaningless without the freedom to say "no". But
even if I say "no", I value the freedom to say "yes".

That is fundamental.

Imagine -- they've got a current employee,
on staff, who runs a website solely for the
purposes of impugning his employer!


Imagine that.

I have no quarrel with my employer (after all, I'm self employed), so if
the freedom to impunge my employer were taken away from me, it wouldn't
affect my daily life. But I think it's an important freedom, and part of
what makes this country great.


In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for immediate
termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as you have
described it.



  #7  
Old September 21st 06, 01:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Dress Code

That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he
rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really
is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some
egomaniacal twit with a tie.

Employers that make being a yes man a requirement for employment need to be
terminated.

mike

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...

In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for immediate
termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as you have
described it.





  #8  
Old September 21st 06, 05:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Dress Code


"mike regish" wrote in message
...
That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch,
he rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he
really is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of
some egomaniacal twit with a tie.


And what forces the employee to stay? You need only to look in a mirror to
see the twit.

Employers that make being a yes man a requirement for employment need to
be terminated.


Nobody said anything about a yes man. You present the typical twisted union
attitude.

mike

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...

In most corporations bad mouthing the corporation is grounds for
immediate termination as is insubordination. There is no such freedom as
you have described it.







  #9  
Old September 21st 06, 05:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Dress Code

That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he
rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really
is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some
egomaniacal twit with a tie.


Mike, instead of cowering behind your union, you need to get out in
front of the curve, and really hang it out as the boss of your own
business. Maybe come up with a new way to make a better widget, and
set the world on fire. Really be a man, take some real risks, and face
the realities of the modern business world unprotected by union rules
that allow you to remain employed despite hating everything and
everyone around you.

Maybe it's time for you to see what it's like to trust your future and
your family's good fortune to employees that might care as little about
your company as you obviously do. It'll be an enlightening experience,
I assure you.

I think you've got the makings of a good entrepreneur. You've
certainly got the attitude.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #10  
Old September 21st 06, 04:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 80
Default Dress Code

I so know where you are coming from but it's so narrow minded. Why not
accept graciously that some people are bosses, some are workers, some
are artists, and some are priests. If everyone measured their self
worth on the same scale, this would be a pretty sad and boring life.

It takes a village. I enjoy living in it.

Jay Honeck wrote:
That is exactly why we need unions. Any boss gets his panties in a bunch, he
rides the employee until the employee tells him just what an ass he really
is, so the employee, who is only human, loses his job because of some
egomaniacal twit with a tie.



Mike, instead of cowering behind your union, you need to get out in
front of the curve, and really hang it out as the boss of your own
business. Maybe come up with a new way to make a better widget, and
set the world on fire. Really be a man, take some real risks, and face
the realities of the modern business world unprotected by union rules
that allow you to remain employed despite hating everything and
everyone around you.

Maybe it's time for you to see what it's like to trust your future and
your family's good fortune to employees that might care as little about
your company as you obviously do. It'll be an enlightening experience,
I assure you.

I think you've got the makings of a good entrepreneur. You've
certainly got the attitude.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Run up for plug clearing Roger Long Piloting 78 October 18th 04 03:39 AM
Winscore source code now available Guy Byars Soaring 0 February 5th 04 10:43 AM
Need Help with Northstar M1 Loran Jerald Malin Owning 4 December 8th 03 05:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.