![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Graeme Cant wrote: I have a crazy suggestion too. So do I. How about if you actually join the community first by registering for the OLC and then posting some flights, before you jump in and start telling us what we should or should not be doing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Graeme Cant wrote: Paul Remde wrote: I must respectfully disagree. If we just use sunset as the end of soaring flight that gives an unfair advantage to a pilot that is far from home or at altitude when the sun sets. He/she should have planned ahead and landed on time. And exactly which time would that be, Paul? The time calculated by the USNO, the "the preeminent authority in the areas of Precise Time and Astrometry" (at least in the US). You seem to have lost track of the story so far: Doug wants to be able to pick illegal flights on OLC but he's having trouble deciding which flights are illegal because he doesn't know when it's "sunset" (as 'un'defined in the FARs) at all the places OLC flights go to. First, how dare you decide what I "want" based on what? If you look at the subject line, and the original post to this thread, a reasonable person would conclude that I do not want to do as you insinuate, and am trying to warn pilots in advance, so it does not become a bigger issue. Now read on: I know this won't help but in Oz the rules a 1. "Night" is the period between the end of evening civil twilight and the beginning of morning civil twilight. 2. CASA (FAA equivalent) publishes beginning and end of daylight graphs for latitudes from 0 to 45 throughout the year. 3. Daylight flight occurs between those times after converting local time to Standard/Daylight Time. Note that daylight "ceases" at a particular longitude solely dependent on its latitude. No allowance for terrain, etc. And the date of course. This is based on the zenith angle of the sun. But the following is also in the AIP: "Users ... should note that the parameters used in compiling the ... Graphs do not include the nature of the terrain ... other than a cloudless sky and unlimited visibility ... Consequently, the presence of cloud cover, poor visibility or high terrain to the west of an aerodrome will cause daylight to end ... earlier than that extracted from the appropriate graph. Allowance should made for these factors when planning a flight..." Yes, and all of these factors make sunset earlier, not later than predicted by the standard formula for almost all normal soaring flights. Unless you are flying off of a west facing beach in Winter, sunset will be earlier than predicted because the horizon will be higher, and the refraction will be less because the atmosphere is less dense than standard sea level. The rules are reasonable but are no help in maintaining a level playing field for a gliding competition. So, Doug. Make up your mind what arbitrary rule you would like to implement for the SSA-OLC and publish it. Let's say - evening civil twilight at the latitude. This is similarly an insulting insinuation. First off, I am not making the rules, just trying to follow the direction the Committee and I have been given by the Board. The direction is clear; the flight must end by sunset, unless approved lighting was used, and this is noted in the comments section of the OLC claim. Stop using the FAA as an excuse and a crutch. Stand on your own feet. Make a rule. Publish it. Enforce it. Cop the flak. Done. Done. and being Done. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Haluza" wrote in message
oups.com... If you look at the subject line, and the original post to this thread, a reasonable person would conclude that I ... am trying to warn pilots in advance, so it does not become a bigger issue. Just to keep the facts straight, let's say that "in advance" is a bit of an exaggeration on Doug's part. The thread with the subject "...Warning..." was posted *after* several flights were suddenly found to appear to be in violation of the sunset rule. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yuliy Gerchikov wrote: "Doug Haluza" wrote in message oups.com... If you look at the subject line, and the original post to this thread, a reasonable person would conclude that I ... am trying to warn pilots in advance, so it does not become a bigger issue. Just to keep the facts straight, let's say that "in advance" is a bit of an exaggeration on Doug's part. The thread with the subject "...Warning..." was posted *after* several flights were suddenly found to appear to be in violation of the sunset rule. Yes, and the original post says that too. It's a warning to anyone else who may think that it's OK to follow in your footsteps. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Remde wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message oups.com. Given the uncertainty of the actual official sunset time I repeat my request that SAA's sunset time be used only to determine the "end of soaring flight" and not used to determine the validity of the entire flight. I must respectfully disagree. If we just use sunset as the end of soaring flight that gives an unfair advantage to a pilot that is far from home or at altitude when the sun sets. He/she should have planned ahead and landed on time. I think calling sunset the end of soaring flight for the OLC is fine if the pilot is given a few minutes more to land. If the flight continues beyond that it could be considered sufficient evidence of poor planning, or bad faith, and the whole flight automatically disallowed. "SS + 0:05" might work for everybody in determining when to disqualify an entire flight, and not require the services of both defense counsel and a battery of astronomers just to mollify a nanny SSA-OLC. And who cares how far from home the pilot is? Let him land out and walk home, as long as the ship touched down within a few minutes of whatever "FAA Official Sunset" might have been at that place and time. There are no declarations necessary, nor is OLC an assigned task. Next thing we know, we'll be needing Official Observers. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |