![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ContestID67" wrote in message ups.com... Our club has recently purchased an electronic flight recorder (Cambridge 302) to be used by the membership in the various club ships. This is to replace the barograph which seems to be continuously out of certification, out of paper, not any good for tasks, etc, etc. Is this the proper use of a 302? All that in and out of different gliders, having to reset the plumbing each time for the static and TE, having to re accomplish the paper work, installing and removing equipment may require Form 337s and log book entries by the appropriate mechanic? There are other "gps data only" loggers that do not tie into the instrument panel that can be supplied power and put in the "baro box", is easy to move from ship to ship, declarations with proper names etc, are made from a lap top and then uploaded to the data logger and handed to the pilot or OO. BT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please tell us you are using a Camb 302A, not a 302.
-- Hartley Falbaum "ContestID67" wrote in message ups.com... Our club has recently purchased an electronic flight recorder (Cambridge 302) to be used by the membership in the various club ships. This is to replace the barograph which seems to be continuously out of certification, out of paper, not any good for tasks, etc, etc. The question has arisen about the pilot and ship information that should be stored in the flight recorder. I know that if each pilot enter his name and ship info before each flight, that the SSA Badge committee will be happy. However this is tedious (connect to a computer or PDA) and prone to error. Nothing would be worse than setting a record only to find that the log is in someone else's name. Of course this would be no one's fault but the PIC but the situation is definately something to avoid if possible. What I would like to do is enter generic information into the flight recorder and let the observer certify that this particular pilot flew this flight. The generic information would be "Club Name Pilots" and "Club Name Fleet". I feel that this is similar to the club use of a barograph. It is also similar to a private ship owned by a parternership. Maybe leaving the info blank is the best approach. I have placed a request with the SSA to see if my "generic info" idea is a good course of action. No response to date. What are your thoughts? What does your club do? Thanks, John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ditto, Harley.
Passing around a 302 means pulling off pitot, TE, and static lines, power cable, pda cable (if using pda), temperature probe, and antenna cable. I suppose if they use a 'quick disconnect' feature for the pneumatic lines, they won't have to replace them all of the time. But it sure seems like a Volkslogger or Colibri or the new itty bitty EW recorder would have worked very nicely. What connections are required for the 302A? Just power and antenna? Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 03:18 24 September 2006, Hl Falbaum wrote: Please tell us you are using a Camb 302A, not a 302. -- Hartley Falbaum 'ContestID67' wrote in message oups.com... Our club has recently purchased an electronic flight recorder (Cambridge 302) to be used by the membership in the various club ships. This is to replace the barograph which seems to be continuously out of certification, out of paper, not any good for tasks, etc, etc. The question has arisen about the pilot and ship information that should be stored in the flight recorder. I know that if each pilot enter his name and ship info before each flight, that the SSA Badge committee will be happy. However this is tedious (connect to a computer or PDA) and prone to error. Nothing would be worse than setting a record only to find that the log is in someone else's name. Of course this would be no one's fault but the PIC but the situation is definately something to avoid if possible. What I would like to do is enter generic information into the flight recorder and let the observer certify that this particular pilot flew this flight. The generic information would be 'Club Name Pilots' and 'Club Name Fleet'. I feel that this is similar to the club use of a barograph. It is also similar to a private ship owned by a parternership. Maybe leaving the info blank is the best approach. I have placed a request with the SSA to see if my 'generic info' idea is a good course of action. No response to date. What are your thoughts? What does your club do? Thanks, John |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 302A has power and antenna inputs and gps outputs to drive a PDA. It
can, IIRC, drive an iPAQ with enough current to leave the backlight on, and it is 5 V so no converter is needed. The Vario functions of the 302 woould be a real PITA to transfer from ship to ship in a club environment. Too many risks of mishandling the setup could lead to disaster. -- Hartley Falbaum USA "KF" "Ray Lovinggood" wrote in message ... Ditto, Harley. Passing around a 302 means pulling off pitot, TE, and static lines, power cable, pda cable (if using pda), temperature probe, and antenna cable. I suppose if they use a 'quick disconnect' feature for the pneumatic lines, they won't have to replace them all of the time. But it sure seems like a Volkslogger or Colibri or the new itty bitty EW recorder would have worked very nicely. What connections are required for the 302A? Just power and antenna? Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA At 03:18 24 September 2006, Hl Falbaum wrote: Please tell us you are using a Camb 302A, not a 302. -- Hartley Falbaum 'ContestID67' wrote in message roups.com... Our club has recently purchased an electronic flight recorder (Cambridge 302) to be used by the membership in the various club ships. This is to replace the barograph which seems to be continuously out of certification, out of paper, not any good for tasks, etc, etc. The question has arisen about the pilot and ship information that should be stored in the flight recorder. I know that if each pilot enter his name and ship info before each flight, that the SSA Badge committee will be happy. However this is tedious (connect to a computer or PDA) and prone to error. Nothing would be worse than setting a record only to find that the log is in someone else's name. Of course this would be no one's fault but the PIC but the situation is definately something to avoid if possible. What I would like to do is enter generic information into the flight recorder and let the observer certify that this particular pilot flew this flight. The generic information would be 'Club Name Pilots' and 'Club Name Fleet'. I feel that this is similar to the club use of a barograph. It is also similar to a private ship owned by a parternership. Maybe leaving the info blank is the best approach. I have placed a request with the SSA to see if my 'generic info' idea is a good course of action. No response to date. What are your thoughts? What does your club do? Thanks, John |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry boys. Yes, this is a 302A. A 302 would be a horrible choice due
to all the plumbing. We have placed the 302A in a plastic box with an internal battery. It is a completely standalone box, no external plumbing of any sort necessary. The question is: What does *YOUR* club do? Do they have something to share amongst members besides a mechanical barograph? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ContestID67 wrote: Sorry boys. Yes, this is a 302A. A 302 would be a horrible choice due to all the plumbing. We have placed the 302A in a plastic box with an internal battery. It is a completely standalone box, no external plumbing of any sort necessary. The question is: What does *YOUR* club do? Do they have something to share amongst members besides a mechanical barograph? My club (Aero Club Albatross - ACA) purchased a couple of Colibri units. Since we have more ships than FRs, we have it set up so each unit can be plugged in to a standard wiring harness in any club ship. We have an old desktop PC in the operations shack that some people use to update the pilot name, but (as weas previously mentioned) the main thing is to ensure that the badge or record claim specifically identifies any anomalies in the declaration area and that the OO explains them (e.g. "Pilot record not updated prior to flight; OO verified that [name] was the pilot for the flight claimed") Erik Mann LS8-18 (P3) State record keeper for NJ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our club uses a Volkslogger. It is small and easily moved between gliders.
The club has a laptop we use with StrePla or SeeYou to load flight declarations and download flight logs. We have a seperate battery used just for the volkslogger that is easily stored in the plane, so it can be moved to club member planes as well as club planes with no impact on the glider wiring. The Volkslogger display provides a small, but very useful amount of navigation information. It also will display the altitude being logged so that you can make sure you don't appear to bust 18,000. John Scott |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ContestID67 wrote:
The question is: What does *YOUR* club do? Do they have something to share amongst members besides a mechanical barograph? My club, in the UK, has a collection of EW Model A and B loggers. These do not have external power supplies: they can only operate off their internal 9v batteries, so there's no issue with powering them. They work well enough to handle Silver C badge requirements. Club members usually do the C in one of the club's SZD Juniors, which do not have GPS or and logger wiring fitted. Height and duration flights are usually done while soaring locally, so the barometric record and OO observation of launch and landing does the trick. Distance is usually a flight to another suitably placed club site, so again the loggers can be used stand-alone with our OO observing the launch and a landing declaration signed at the destination club. The club considers that landing at an unknown club field is a good learning experience. If the pilot owns a GPS he can carry it to generate a trace but is discouraged from looking at it during the flight. Once again, we think that map reading "for real" without an instructor looking over the pilot's shoulder is a useful bit of experience. The club's high performance single seaters have GPS fitted (and now have SDI C3 varios in place of their former M-Navs) and are wired to provide a GPS data feed to our EW model A and B loggers. This works well for tasks ranging from the BGA 100 km diploma up to Gold distance and Diamond Goal flights. HTH -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |