A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 06, 05:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...


Hell Jim, I'm still trying to deal with Scrodenger's cat and after dinner
I have to find why Fermat outsmarted both me and the Pythagoreans with the
3rd exponent!!! :-)))


Schrödinger's cat was rabid!!


  #2  
Old October 16th 06, 05:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

Matt Barrow wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...

Hell Jim, I'm still trying to deal with Scrodenger's cat and after dinner
I have to find why Fermat outsmarted both me and the Pythagoreans with the
3rd exponent!!! :-)))


Schrödinger's cat was rabid!!


Or dead.....
  #3  
Old October 16th 06, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Crash Lander[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 233
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:QNyYg.3098$XX2.1632@dukeread04...
LOL

BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that to
create matter with a weight equal to a person would require
the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
control and without destruction of the mechanism.


Obviously you meant to add "using current known technologies!"
Crash Lander


  #4  
Old October 16th 06, 03:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

If I send only energy waves, the energy required to for a 2
Kg mass would be equal to the fuel in a 30 megaton bomb. To
create a 100 Kg person's mass would take fifty times that
[don't ask, I didn't actually bother to solve the equation
and I don't know for sure that critical mass is 2 Kg.] But
the energy would create "dust" [dust to dust, rust to rust]
and it would be dead, have no memory and no DNA.

As soon as we develop the power of the one and only GOD, we
can create a new universe and wait a billion years for it to
cool and condense. Evolution [part of God's plan] takes
over and tada, you've been transported.


"Crash Lander" wrote in message
...
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:QNyYg.3098$XX2.1632@dukeread04...
| LOL
|
| BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
| happen and [NOT] just because of the Heisenberg (sp)
effect.
| Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that
to
| create matter with a weight equal to a person would
require
| the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
| control and without destruction of the mechanism.
|
| Obviously you meant to add "using current known
technologies!"
| Crash Lander
|
|


  #5  
Old October 16th 06, 06:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
cjcampbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?


Jim Macklin wrote:
LOL

BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that to
create matter with a weight equal to a person would require
the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
control and without destruction of the mechanism.


The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the discovery of
controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early days it was
difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on other planets
made control of the reaction much easier. The transporter was
impossible without the crystals, as was related technology, including
the communicators. The communicators did not use radio waves as we know
them, but were really miniature transporters that moved data. The
phasers, including the hand weapons, also used this technology.
Everything in Star Trek, from the spacecraft engines to shields,
cloaking devices, communicators, the Tricorder and Dr. McCoy's
examination pen were all variants of the same fundamental device. Even
the Holodeck is dependent on it.

  #6  
Old October 16th 06, 08:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

Well then, until we can go to other planets, it will have to
wait. Wait, Catch 22, no warp drive, can't get there to get
warp drive.



"cjcampbell" wrote in
message
ups.com...
|
| Jim Macklin wrote:
| LOL
|
| BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
| happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
| Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that
to
| create matter with a weight equal to a person would
require
| the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
| control and without destruction of the mechanism.
|
| The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the
discovery of
| controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early days
it was
| difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on
other planets
| made control of the reaction much easier. The transporter
was
| impossible without the crystals, as was related
technology, including
| the communicators. The communicators did not use radio
waves as we know
| them, but were really miniature transporters that moved
data. The
| phasers, including the hand weapons, also used this
technology.
| Everything in Star Trek, from the spacecraft engines to
shields,
| cloaking devices, communicators, the Tricorder and Dr.
McCoy's
| examination pen were all variants of the same fundamental
device. Even
| the Holodeck is dependent on it.
|


  #7  
Old October 16th 06, 11:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

"cjcampbell" wrote in message
ups.com...

Jim Macklin wrote:
LOL

BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that to
create matter with a weight equal to a person would require
the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
control and without destruction of the mechanism.


The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the discovery of
controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early days it was
difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on other planets
made control of the reaction much easier. The transporter was
impossible without the crystals,


The transporter on Star Trek works because they were scheduled to start
shooting and the shuttle craft / set wasn't done so they had to come up with
something quick to get up and down to a planet.

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


  #8  
Old October 17th 06, 01:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

Truth, at last. It is all make believe.



"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com
wrote in message
...
| "cjcampbell" wrote in
message
|
ups.com...
|
| Jim Macklin wrote:
| LOL
|
| BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
| happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
| Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that
to
| create matter with a weight equal to a person would
require
| the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
| control and without destruction of the mechanism.
|
| The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the
discovery of
| controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early
days it was
| difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on
other planets
| made control of the reaction much easier. The
transporter was
| impossible without the crystals,
|
| The transporter on Star Trek works because they were
scheduled to start
| shooting and the shuttle craft / set wasn't done so they
had to come up with
| something quick to get up and down to a planet.
|
| --
| Geoff
| The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
| remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply
by mail
| When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.
|
|


  #9  
Old October 17th 06, 06:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com writes:

The transporter on Star Trek works because they were scheduled to start
shooting and the shuttle craft / set wasn't done so they had to come up with
something quick to get up and down to a planet.


I read that the concept was invented just to speed up the movement of
the plot in a one-hour program--otherwise a lot of time would
potentially be wasted with either shuttlecraft movements or take-offs
and landings of the entire Enterprise.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #10  
Old October 18th 06, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Blanche Cohen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 48
Default Does a Baron 58 have an ejection seat?

Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote:
"cjcampbell" wrote in message

Jim Macklin wrote:
LOL

BTW, matter transmission as done on StarTrek can NEVER
happen and just because of the Heisenberg (sp) effect.
Einstein's equation works both ways, E=MC^2 means that to
create matter with a weight equal to a person would require
the energy of several thousand atomic bombs, under full
control and without destruction of the mechanism.


The only reason it works on Star Trek is because of the discovery of
controlled matter-antimatter reactions. In the early days it was
difficult and dangerous, but dilithium crystals found on other planets
made control of the reaction much easier. The transporter was
impossible without the crystals,


The transporter on Star Trek works because they were scheduled to start
shooting and the shuttle craft / set wasn't done so they had to come up with
something quick to get up and down to a planet.


Geoff:

Please cease your rational, pragmatic, logical and truthful comments
in this thread. They just don't make sense.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airtex Interior Refurbish - Day 48 Mike Spera Owning 4 May 16th 05 07:10 PM
JFT - Ejection Seat Question Pat Carpenter Naval Aviation 1 March 8th 04 11:05 PM
Ejection Seat parts needed please!!!! Chris Jamesson Military Aviation 0 January 9th 04 06:00 PM
LF: ACES II ejection seat Tim Bayne Military Aviation 2 September 20th 03 10:57 PM
ACES II ejection seat Davide Products 0 September 20th 03 10:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.