A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

IFR Cancellation Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 9th 06, 02:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default IFR Cancellation Question

Ron Rosenfeld wrote in
:

Once I get a visual on my airport (KMBO - uncontrolled), I do cancel IFR
as soon as I can.


Perhaps you should reconsider and not cancel IFR until you are legal for
VFR. There have been plenty of times when I've had a "visual" on my
airport, but not been legal VFR.
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)


Ahh, yes, I probably should have said when VFR, I cancel as soon as I can
:-)

Though to be honest, I have never encountered your situation where I was
able to even think about cancelling IFR, as less then one mile viz from the
airport or ceilings lower then 1000 feet is pretty crummy conditions to
even consider cancelling IFR in the air. I certainly won't cancel while I
am in the pattern as at that point, what's a few minutes more for the
airplane behind me.

The 3 or 4 times I have gone to minimums at my airport (1 mile viz and 900
ceilings on a VOR Alpha), last thought on my mind was "communicate" Aviate
and Navigate were first and foremost. I just wait and cancel via CD or FSS
if necessary as soon as I can after cleaning up the plane and am cleared
the runway.

I have read cases where a pilot has cancelled IFR in less then VFR
conditions only to meet up with FSDO personell after landing....

Allen
  #2  
Old December 10th 06, 05:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default IFR Cancellation Question


Ron Rosenfeld wrote:

Perhaps you should reconsider and not cancel IFR until you are legal for
VFR. There have been plenty of times when I've had a "visual" on my
airport, but not been legal VFR.


He didn't say he cancels as soon as he has a visual on the airport, he
said once he has a visual on the airport he cancels as soon as he can.

  #3  
Old December 8th 06, 09:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default IFR Cancellation Question

A Lieberma wrote:
They would if the tower had no radar.


Ok, makes sense on the radar services being terminated, but the IFR
clearance still applies for airspace seperation?

IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground???


At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels
touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). IFR separation
doesn't require radar contact. It doesn't even require radio contact.
Both of those just make it possible to apply more efficient methods of
achieving the required separation.
  #4  
Old December 8th 06, 10:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default IFR Cancellation Question

At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels
touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own).


If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though,
you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle.

Jose
--
"There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows
what they are." - (mike).
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #5  
Old December 8th 06, 10:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default IFR Cancellation Question

In article ,
Jose wrote:

At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels
touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own).


If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though,
you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle.

Jose


If you're flying a Cat IIIc approach, the tower probably can't see you,
your wheels, or the runway, so it works out.
  #6  
Old December 10th 06, 05:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default IFR Cancellation Question


Jose wrote:

If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though,
you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle.


In conditions requiring a Cat IIIc approach the tower can't see your
wheels touch the ground.

  #7  
Old December 8th 06, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mark Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 420
Default IFR Cancellation Question

On 12/08/06 13:54, Roy Smith wrote:
A Lieberma wrote:
They would if the tower had no radar.


Ok, makes sense on the radar services being terminated, but the IFR
clearance still applies for airspace seperation?

IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground???


At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels
touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). IFR separation
doesn't require radar contact. It doesn't even require radio contact.
Both of those just make it possible to apply more efficient methods of
achieving the required separation.


So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR?
This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that
you're no longer IFR, right?

Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed
by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated?

I think the only thing that was missing in Allen's case was the
clearance to fly the visual approach.


--
Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane
Cal Aggie Flying Farmers
Sacramento, CA
  #8  
Old December 8th 06, 11:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,886
Default IFR Cancellation Question



Mark Hansen wrote:



So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR?
This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that
you're no longer IFR, right?


No, that measn the controller thought you were VFR.




Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed
by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated?


If you are terminated you still stay on your code unless you are now
going to be VFR.



  #9  
Old December 9th 06, 01:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
A Lieberma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 318
Default IFR Cancellation Question

Mark Hansen wrote in
:

So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR?
This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that
you're no longer IFR, right?


Mark,

My experiences operating in areas of no radar coverage (NOT what happened
here in my original post) is that you maintain your transponder code and
work with "reporting points" as required under IFR enroute rules.

I was in Charlie airspace when I was told to squawk VFR in my original
post, thus my confusion

Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed
by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated?


For no radar coverage, you maintain your transponder code. I had asked
when this happened to me the first time and Center advised me to retain
the code and when I come out of the non radar environment, he would pick
me up. I'd rather sound dumb on the radio then do something dumb :-))

I think the only thing that was missing in Allen's case was the
clearance to fly the visual approach.


EXACTLY right! AND the IFR cancellation received, squawk VFR" buzz words
I learn to know and love.

Those rank up there with "cleared to land" at a controlled airport :-)

Allen
  #10  
Old December 9th 06, 03:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default IFR Cancellation Question

Mark Hansen wrote:

Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed
by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated?

Well in the ADIZ you darn well better keep squawking that discrete
code to the ground even if you cancel IFR (ATC will usually warn
you about this...violations are a pain in the butt for them too).

It's pretty standard everywhere else. I've never been told to
squawk VFR while IFR even without radar service.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question JB Owning 13 November 27th 04 09:32 PM
Handheld battery question RobsSanta General Aviation 8 September 19th 04 03:07 PM
A question on Airworthiness Inspection Dave S Home Built 1 August 10th 04 05:07 AM
Question Charles S Home Built 4 April 5th 04 09:10 PM
Partnership Question Harry Gordon Owning 4 August 16th 03 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.