![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote in
: Once I get a visual on my airport (KMBO - uncontrolled), I do cancel IFR as soon as I can. Perhaps you should reconsider and not cancel IFR until you are legal for VFR. There have been plenty of times when I've had a "visual" on my airport, but not been legal VFR. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Ahh, yes, I probably should have said when VFR, I cancel as soon as I can :-) Though to be honest, I have never encountered your situation where I was able to even think about cancelling IFR, as less then one mile viz from the airport or ceilings lower then 1000 feet is pretty crummy conditions to even consider cancelling IFR in the air. I certainly won't cancel while I am in the pattern as at that point, what's a few minutes more for the airplane behind me. The 3 or 4 times I have gone to minimums at my airport (1 mile viz and 900 ceilings on a VOR Alpha), last thought on my mind was "communicate" Aviate and Navigate were first and foremost. I just wait and cancel via CD or FSS if necessary as soon as I can after cleaning up the plane and am cleared the runway. I have read cases where a pilot has cancelled IFR in less then VFR conditions only to meet up with FSDO personell after landing.... Allen |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Rosenfeld wrote: Perhaps you should reconsider and not cancel IFR until you are legal for VFR. There have been plenty of times when I've had a "visual" on my airport, but not been legal VFR. He didn't say he cancels as soon as he has a visual on the airport, he said once he has a visual on the airport he cancels as soon as he can. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma wrote:
They would if the tower had no radar. Ok, makes sense on the radar services being terminated, but the IFR clearance still applies for airspace seperation? IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground??? At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). IFR separation doesn't require radar contact. It doesn't even require radio contact. Both of those just make it possible to apply more efficient methods of achieving the required separation. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels
touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though, you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle. Jose -- "There are 3 secrets to the perfect landing. Unfortunately, nobody knows what they are." - (mike). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jose wrote: At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though, you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle. Jose If you're flying a Cat IIIc approach, the tower probably can't see you, your wheels, or the runway, so it works out. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: If your wheels touch the ground on a Cat IIIc missed approach though, you ought to still be IFR. That would be one pretty pickle. In conditions requiring a Cat IIIc approach the tower can't see your wheels touch the ground. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/08/06 13:54, Roy Smith wrote:
A Lieberma wrote: They would if the tower had no radar. Ok, makes sense on the radar services being terminated, but the IFR clearance still applies for airspace seperation? IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground??? At a towered airport without radar, you are still IFR until your wheels touch the ground (assuming you don't cancel on your own). IFR separation doesn't require radar contact. It doesn't even require radio contact. Both of those just make it possible to apply more efficient methods of achieving the required separation. So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR? This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that you're no longer IFR, right? Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated? I think the only thing that was missing in Allen's case was the clearance to fly the visual approach. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Hansen wrote: So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR? This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that you're no longer IFR, right? No, that measn the controller thought you were VFR. Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated? If you are terminated you still stay on your code unless you are now going to be VFR. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote in
: So I wonder if the confusion came when ATC told Allen to Squawk VFR? This just means that you're no longer in radar contact, and not that you're no longer IFR, right? Mark, My experiences operating in areas of no radar coverage (NOT what happened here in my original post) is that you maintain your transponder code and work with "reporting points" as required under IFR enroute rules. I was in Charlie airspace when I was told to squawk VFR in my original post, thus my confusion Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated? For no radar coverage, you maintain your transponder code. I had asked when this happened to me the first time and Center advised me to retain the code and when I come out of the non radar environment, he would pick me up. I'd rather sound dumb on the radio then do something dumb :-)) I think the only thing that was missing in Allen's case was the clearance to fly the visual approach. EXACTLY right! AND the IFR cancellation received, squawk VFR" buzz words I learn to know and love. Those rank up there with "cleared to land" at a controlled airport :-) Allen |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
Or, are you supposed to maintain your transponder code until changed by ATC or you cancel IFR - even if radar service is terminated? Well in the ADIZ you darn well better keep squawking that discrete code to the ground even if you cancel IFR (ATC will usually warn you about this...violations are a pain in the butt for them too). It's pretty standard everywhere else. I've never been told to squawk VFR while IFR even without radar service. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |