![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Natalie wrote: Newps wrote: A Lieberma wrote: IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground??? ATC takes no overt action to cancel an IFR aircraft landing at a towered field. You just land. Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: Ron Natalie wrote: Newps wrote: A Lieberma wrote: IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground??? ATC takes no overt action to cancel an IFR aircraft landing at a towered field. You just land. Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? What happens (I'm mostly thinking helicopters here) if you land someplace within the CDSA that's off-airport and out of sight of the tower? For example, at HPN, we've got a private helipad not far from the airport. I don't imagine that's too unusual. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Smith wrote: What happens (I'm mostly thinking helicopters here) if you land someplace within the CDSA that's off-airport and out of sight of the tower? For example, at HPN, we've got a private helipad not far from the airport. I don't imagine that's too unusual. The tower would have you report to them and that would be the end of it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? I don't know how it happens, but the requirement is that they're supposed to notice whether I have arrived at my destination not whether I was handed off by approach. This means one of two things: 1. Tower must tell the system that I've landed. 2. Tower must tell the system that I haven't landed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Natalie wrote: Newps wrote: Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? The tower will know if you landed. What did you think happened? I don't know how it happens, but the requirement is that they're supposed to notice whether I have arrived at my destination not whether I was handed off by approach. This means one of two things: 1. Tower must tell the system that I've landed. 2. Tower must tell the system that I haven't landed. The tower is "the system". At a tower without radar the approach control will call on the landline and tell them about the IFR inbound. At the agreed upon time/place the approach control tells the aircraft to contact tower. Aircraft lands. Tower goes back to conversation on how bad the Bears quarterback really is. The only time the tower calls the approach control back is if something unusual happens. Aircraft never calls tower at the expected time, aircraft has some kind of problem that requires him to manuver unexpectedly thereby possibly affecting separation of others inbound or outbound, etc. A normal approach and landing is what's expected. In a tower with radar all the above happens without a call on the landline. The transfer of information is automated. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Natalie wrote: I don't know how it happens, but the requirement is that they're supposed to notice whether I have arrived at my destination not whether I was handed off by approach. This means one of two things: 1. Tower must tell the system that I've landed. 2. Tower must tell the system that I haven't landed. 1. Tower is part of the system. 2. Tower sees you land. 3. The system knows you landed. 1. Tower doesn't see you land. 2. Tower calls you on radio. 3. You don't respond to tower. 4. Tower initiates search. OR 3. You respond "missed approach". 4. Tower says "contact departure". OR Several other variations. The point is no action is taken by the tower to cancel an IFR flight plan for a landing aircraft because there simply isn't any action that needs to be taken. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Natalie wrote: Really, then how does the system know you landed and not crashed on approach? If the tower sees you on the runway they know you didn't crash on approach. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A Lieberma wrote: Ok, makes sense on the radar services being terminated, but the IFR clearance still applies for airspace seperation? Still IFR. IFR would be then cancelled once wheels touch ground??? IFR is cancelled upon landing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 09:32 PM |
Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 03:07 PM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 16th 03 11:23 PM |