![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Do I think either of them could do it for real just because they did it in the office on the sim - nope, not a chance. What does this tell me? - just because you can do it in the sim doesn't mean you can do it when it counts. No, it just tells you that you don't believe they could do it for real. Without actually trying it, you'll never know. Would you care to sit in the back seat when someone tries this? Do a search of the NTSB records and see how many "continued VFR" type accidents you can find. There's a good chance that they could do it for real, depending on their personalities. Preposterous. The sim has its place for sure, but it will never replace actual experience. Saying that over and over doesn't make it true. Obviously nothing, including facts and real world evidence will suffice to convince you. I did my first skydive quite awhile ago before tandems were popular. I That was you. But not everyone is like you. Yes, that is true. BDS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS writes:
Would you care to sit in the back seat when someone tries this? No. But until you do it, you're poorly placed to make any pronouncements about it. That's what simulators are all about. What good is practicing a procedure if you die in the process? Obviously nothing, including facts and real world evidence will suffice to convince you. Facts and real-world evidence are persuasive. Emotional outbursts, repetition, and personal attacks are not. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... No. But until you do it, you're poorly placed to make any pronouncements about it. Coming from you that is a pretty funny statement. Hey, it's been fun but now this is way past tedious so au revoir. BDS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simulators are used for everything, from designing bridges, to
skyscrapers, integrated circuits, airplanes and spacecrafts. Simulators are even used for making other simulators. I doubt there is anything done in this world today without first doing a computer simulation. In aviation, FAA has its own definition of what a simulator is, but that does not make every other PC based simulator just a game. We have a ancient piece of crap at a local FBO in which you can legally log simulator time. If it weren't for that fact, no one would pay a dime to sit in it. But people pay $25/hr for the priviledge of using it. BDS wrote: "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... There's no such thing as magic. No, but until humans can function completely separate from emotion and stress, and the psychological impact they have on performance, experience in a simulator will never be equal to the real thing. Confidence in one's ability to perform a task comes from prior experience under similar conditions - the conditions in a sim are nothing like real life. You will never have any credibility on the subject until you can speak from a background of experience in both areas. You speak only for yourself, of course. No, I believe I speak for quite a few people here. But, even if that weren't true, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that someone who is talking from a background of zero experience doesn't have much credibility in the subject matter. BDS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDS writes:
No, but until humans can function completely separate from emotion and stress, and the psychological impact they have on performance, experience in a simulator will never be equal to the real thing. That's why it's called a simulator. However, a simulator doesn't have to provide identical experience in order to accomplish its purpose (which, in this case, might be to train airline pilots). Confidence in one's ability to perform a task comes from prior experience under similar conditions - the conditions in a sim are nothing like real life. They can be made as close to real life as required. Try it. But, even if that weren't true, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that someone who is talking from a background of zero experience doesn't have much credibility in the subject matter. Anyone who depends on credibility is already making a serious mistake. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Video Display to provide projectors to train Navy pilots | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 30th 06 09:43 PM |
The allure of the skies beckons wannabe pilots. | N9NWO | Piloting | 0 | March 8th 05 08:58 PM |
insurance for Sport Pilots! | Cub Driver | Piloting | 4 | September 11th 04 01:14 AM |
Older Pilots and Safety | Bob Johnson | Soaring | 5 | May 21st 04 01:08 AM |