![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting writes:
So if someone who had never been to medical school posed as a surgeon and operated on your wife or child and killed them, you'd be OK if they weren't charged with murder? If he knew what he was doing, they wouldn't be killed. If he didn't know what he was doing, they'd be killed. Either way, his attendance at medical school (or lack thereof) would be irrelevant. After all, a medical license is just a piece of paper from the government. Quite so. It's important not to overestimate the utility of credentials. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message e.com... On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:50:39 -0800, Gig 601XL Builder wrote (in article ): "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message e.com... On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:41:18 -0800, Gig 601XL Builder wrote (in article ): PILOT CHARGED WITH MANSLAUGHTER AFTER FATAL CRASH How terribly unfortunate. Unfortunate for who? If you mean the passengers (assuming they A. Didn't know he didn't have a license and B. Didn't know he was drunk) or all the legally licensed, safely aviators out there who have what we do lessened somewhat in the eyes of the general public then I agree. If you mean for that asshole then well... Flying without a license did not kill his passengers, any more than flying without a flight plan kills anyone. Having a license does not make you a better pilot. There are guys who have flown for many years without a license, even filing and flying IFR in multi-engine aircraft. I do not approve of breaking the law, of course, but I have been around long enough to know that someone who is flying illegally may not be any more dangerous than those who are flying legally. Drunk, of course, is another matter. I think there is something wrong with charging a guy with murder because he did not have a piece of paper from the government. Charging someone with murder for flying without a license is pure vindictiveness -- punishment for daring to defy governmental authority. It is not any more dangerous to fly without a license than with one. You should only be charged for murder if reckless behavior led to a death. I have no problem with charging him with murder if he was drunk. Well they said he had been drinking so I would assume they took that into account. But in these United States and most other countries you are not assumed to be capable of safely commanding an aircraft unless you have a little card from the government that says so. So since charging someone with manslaughter is a legal matter you are going to have to take whether or not he was legally qualified to do what he was doing when the folks in his care got killed. According to the story he NEVER had a certificate so this is not a case where a guy lost his medical because his BP was too high. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:08:46 -0800, Gig 601XL Builder wrote
(in article ): "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message e.com... On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:50:39 -0800, Gig 601XL Builder wrote (in article ): "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message e.com... On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:41:18 -0800, Gig 601XL Builder wrote (in article ): PILOT CHARGED WITH MANSLAUGHTER AFTER FATAL CRASH How terribly unfortunate. Unfortunate for who? If you mean the passengers (assuming they A. Didn't know he didn't have a license and B. Didn't know he was drunk) or all the legally licensed, safely aviators out there who have what we do lessened somewhat in the eyes of the general public then I agree. If you mean for that asshole then well... Flying without a license did not kill his passengers, any more than flying without a flight plan kills anyone. Having a license does not make you a better pilot. There are guys who have flown for many years without a license, even filing and flying IFR in multi-engine aircraft. I do not approve of breaking the law, of course, but I have been around long enough to know that someone who is flying illegally may not be any more dangerous than those who are flying legally. Drunk, of course, is another matter. I think there is something wrong with charging a guy with murder because he did not have a piece of paper from the government. Charging someone with murder for flying without a license is pure vindictiveness -- punishment for daring to defy governmental authority. It is not any more dangerous to fly without a license than with one. You should only be charged for murder if reckless behavior led to a death. I have no problem with charging him with murder if he was drunk. Well they said he had been drinking so I would assume they took that into account. But in these United States and most other countries you are not assumed to be capable of safely commanding an aircraft unless you have a little card from the government that says so. So since charging someone with manslaughter is a legal matter you are going to have to take whether or not he was legally qualified to do what he was doing when the folks in his care got killed. According to the story he NEVER had a certificate so this is not a case where a guy lost his medical because his BP was too high. I know too many guys who have licenses who are no safer (and, in fact, considerably less safe) than guys who do. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Christopher Campbell wrote: I know too many guys who have licenses who are no safer (and, in fact, considerably less safe) than guys who do. What???? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message ups.com... Christopher Campbell wrote: I know too many guys who have licenses who are no safer (and, in fact, considerably less safe) than guys who do. What???? Who do do? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christopher Campbell" wrote in message I think there is something wrong with charging a guy with murder because he did not have a piece of paper from the government. Charging someone with murder for flying without a license is pure vindictiveness -- punishment for daring to defy governmental authority. It is not any more dangerous to fly without a license than with one. You should only be charged for murder if reckless behavior led to a death. I have no problem with charging him with murder if he was drunk. CJ, do you know the difference between "murder" and "manslaughter"? Are you practicing law without a license? :~) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sports Pilot Television Expands Market Coverage | AJ | Piloting | 0 | April 10th 06 11:17 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |
Taylor: Pilot should have been charged | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 04 09:38 PM |