A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

zero fuel w & b



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 07, 07:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
d&tm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default zero fuel w & b


"tom" wrote in message
oups.com...
I fly a homebuilt Savannah (there are quite a few flying in Oz) and if
the pilot weighs less than about 120 pounds, and the fuel is nearly
exhausted, the CG is just slightly forward of the envelop.
tom


Tom, do you carry some ballast to correct this? I know nobody plans to run
out of fuel but if it happened , say from a fuel leak, I would hate to be
worrying about an off field landing with a forward cg.
terry




d&tm wrote:
Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go

outside
the envelope by burning fuel?
Terry
PPL downunder




  #2  
Old January 3rd 07, 11:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default zero fuel w & b

I weigh 170, so the only ballast I carry is around my ass. 8^)
tom

d&tm wrote:
"tom" wrote in message
oups.com...
I fly a homebuilt Savannah (there are quite a few flying in Oz) and if
the pilot weighs less than about 120 pounds, and the fuel is nearly
exhausted, the CG is just slightly forward of the envelop.
tom


Tom, do you carry some ballast to correct this? I know nobody plans to run
out of fuel but if it happened , say from a fuel leak, I would hate to be
worrying about an off field landing with a forward cg.
terry


  #3  
Old January 4th 07, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Beckman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 353
Default zero fuel w & b

"tom" wrote in message
oups.com...
I weigh 170, so the only ballast I carry is around my ass. 8^)
tom


"Does this airplane make me look fat...?"

;O)

Jay B


  #4  
Old January 4th 07, 06:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default zero fuel w & b

Only when I fly naked.
tom

Jay Beckman wrote:
"tom" wrote in message
oups.com...
I weigh 170, so the only ballast I carry is around my ass. 8^)
tom


"Does this airplane make me look fat...?"

;O)

Jay B


  #5  
Old January 3rd 07, 12:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default zero fuel w & b

d&tm wrote:

Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go outside
the envelope by burning fuel? ( I am only interested in the normal
ategory - not utility). Perhaps the training is just to prepare you for
heavy aircraft?


I believe Bonanzas can have this problem in certain configurations.

It depends on which where the CG is. If you've got an aft CG
and burning fuel drives it more aft, you've got problems.

In my plane, we typically sit on the forward CG limit with
the tanks full. Since the envelope is sloped on the forward
CG side (the limit moves aft as you go up in gross weight),
even as the CG moves forward with fuel burn, you're also
getting lighter so the CG limit is moving forward faster.
  #6  
Old January 3rd 07, 07:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
d&tm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default zero fuel w & b


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
...
d&tm wrote:

Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go

outside
the envelope by burning fuel? ( I am only interested in the normal
ategory - not utility). Perhaps the training is just to prepare you

for
heavy aircraft?


I believe Bonanzas can have this problem in certain configurations.

It depends on which where the CG is. If you've got an aft CG
and burning fuel drives it more aft, you've got problems.

In my plane, we typically sit on the forward CG limit with
the tanks full. Since the envelope is sloped on the forward
CG side (the limit moves aft as you go up in gross weight),
even as the CG moves forward with fuel burn, you're also
getting lighter so the CG limit is moving forward faster.


Similar to the Warrior. but you can barely get enough wt in the front to
reach the forward limit. expecially when I am one of them ( 180 lbs). But
it is just possible with a couple of sumu wrestlers and less than full fuel
to exceed the forward limit, in this case burning fuel actually brings you
back in bacause as you say the cg moves forward but the limit moves forward
faster at lower wt.
What is your plane John?
terry
PPL downuder


  #7  
Old January 4th 07, 02:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 406
Default zero fuel w & b

d&tm wrote:

Are there any single engine airplanes out there that really can go outside
the envelope by burning fuel?


The Bonanza is the big example that comes to mind.

The moment of the Fuel is forward of the main spar and as you burn your
fuel off, the CG moves aft.

If you have the 5th and 6th seats filled or have lots of aft baggage,
you can end up aft of limits, which can bite when you are low/slow on
approach.

Dave
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Running dry? Greg Copeland Piloting 257 August 26th 05 03:47 PM
"Tanks on both" checklist item Koopas Ly Piloting 46 December 12th 03 03:42 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
Hot Starting Fuel Injected Engines Peter Duniho Piloting 23 October 18th 03 02:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.