![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
bdl writes: The realism is very striking. That doesn't make it REAL, however. As long as the realism is striking, it doesn't have to be real. The whole purpose of simulation is realism without reality, after all. In the context of aviation the purpose of simulation is to faithfully duplicate the aircraft flight deck, panels and systems, motion, and outside visual references so that pilot qualification in the simulator translates into pilot qualification in the aircraft. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When flying IFR with jet aircraft, the pilot has little discretion
unless specifically given by ATC. A usual transmission is, United xxx, descend to 15000, and that's what you do. On rare occasion, it may be a little looser, United xxx descent at pilot's discretion, cross intersection xyz at 15000. If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul kgyy wrote:
If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. A cheaper way is check this out: http://www.liveatc.net/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
Paul kgyy wrote: If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. A cheaper way is check this out: http://www.liveatc.net/ I'd add the caveat that the value of listening to tower or TRACON, although, great, does not give the flavor of listening to center sectors adjacent to busy terminal airspace. For instance, all the descent stuff that might include PD clearances will occur on Los Angeles Center frequenices, high and low sectors, not on SoCal frequencies. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Spade wrote:
I'd add the caveat that the value of listening to tower or TRACON, although, great, does not give the flavor of listening to center sectors adjacent to busy terminal airspace. For instance, all the descent stuff that might include PD clearances will occur on Los Angeles Center frequenices, high and low sectors, not on SoCal frequencies. Not sure if you are assuming that LiveATC.net only carries tower or TRACON frequencies or not, but in case you a LiveATC.net also carries many centner frequencies. As an example, LiveATC.net has many Boston and NY center frequencies. Another point is that LiveATC is made up of volunteers providing scanned frequencies. There are not a lot of western US frequencies on the site due simply to the lack of volunteers offering them. If you know anyone... ![]() -- Peter A LiveATC volunteer feeding KSYR tower and approach. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: I'd add the caveat that the value of listening to tower or TRACON, although, great, does not give the flavor of listening to center sectors adjacent to busy terminal airspace. For instance, all the descent stuff that might include PD clearances will occur on Los Angeles Center frequenices, high and low sectors, not on SoCal frequencies. Not sure if you are assuming that LiveATC.net only carries tower or TRACON frequencies or not, but in case you a LiveATC.net also carries many centner frequencies. As an example, LiveATC.net has many Boston and NY center frequencies. Another point is that LiveATC is made up of volunteers providing scanned frequencies. There are not a lot of western US frequencies on the site due simply to the lack of volunteers offering them. If you know anyone... ![]() I missed the center frequencies. To get a good flavor of the east high and low LA frequenices you would need a volunteer in Barstow and one somewhere in the Ontario area. ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul kgyy wrote:
When flying IFR with jet aircraft, the pilot has little discretion unless specifically given by ATC. Jets are given pilot discretion clearance whenever possible. It is not a rare event. A usual transmission is, United xxx, descend to 15000, and that's what you do. On rare occasion, it may be a little looser, United xxx descent at pilot's discretion, cross intersection xyz at 15000. You have that a bit wrong. If a crossing restriction is included a pilot's discretion descent is implied. AIM Reference: If the altitude information of an ATC DESCENT clearance includes a provision to “CROSS (fix) AT” or “AT OR ABOVE/BELOW (altitude),” the manner in which the descent is executed to comply with the crossing altitude is at the pilot’s discretion. This authorization to descend at pilot’s discretion is only applicable to that portion of the flight to which the crossing altitude restriction applies, and the pilot is expected to comply with the crossing altitude as a provision of the clearance. Any other clearance in which pilot execution is optional will so state “AT PILOT’S DISCRETION.” If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. If someone has to ride United Airlines to learn about ATC transmissions, the pain isn't worth the gain. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul kgyy wrote: If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. i love that "channel". It's really fun being able to say to the person you're flying with "i can predict the future. Check it out, we're gonna turn left in about 3 seconds" just like at work i always listen to the DFW stream... http://www.caesimuflite.com/atcindex1.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() mad8 wrote: Paul kgyy wrote: If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. i love that "channel". It's really fun being able to say to the person you're flying with "i can predict the future. Check it out, we're gonna turn left in about 3 seconds" Coming into LAX a while back, I was listening on that channel. We were cruising along nicely when I hear ATC urgently call out something like "United 123, traffic twelve o'clock, descend immediately to eight thousand, please expedite!" I turned to my companion and said "hold on". A second later, we all went weightless as the plane took an unusually sharp dive. After we leveled off again, the captain came on the speaker and said, "Well folks, as you can tell, we've just been given permission to descend towards the airport." Kev |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul kgyy writes:
If you want a better feel for what actually goes on than you will ever get via newsgroup, take a couple of United flights and listen to the ATC channel - it can be much more entertaining than the movie at times. I didn't know it was possible to do that. I haven't flown in a long time. I'm surprised nobody has forbidden it as "useful to terrorists." -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|