A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

an exercise for sim pilots -- a 1 G roll



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 5th 07, 02:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 312
Default an exercise for sim pilots -- a 1 G roll

The physics of this 1 g roll are nicely demonstrated at

http://www.stanford.edu/~siegman/one_g_roll.html


The question I had asked in the first posting seems to have been
answered by Kyle.


This was almost as much fun as the airplane on a treadmill thread --
thanks everyone.


Now there's an idea. Let's design a treadmill that follows the 1 g roll
path and sell it to Disney! It wouldn't be much fun for the kids riding
it, would it? ( I have one year from first public disclosure to file a
patent application, right?)

On Jan 5, 9:05 am, "Tony" wrote:
On Jan 5, 6:51 am, Mxsmanic wrote:

Tony writes:
In fact you are wrong. You may wish to look in the archives of this
newsgroup for the proof.The archives of this newsgroup are proof of nothing.Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical

physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis
yourself.

If you are not capable of the analytical physics you might have to do
experimental physics. In your case if you have the skills those can be
gamed.

Or, remain ignorant, and wrong.

Again.





You cannot change altitude without acceleration, and that changes G
force. You cannot execute any type of roll that involves any change
in altitude without a change in G force. This is basic physics.


If you roll the aircraft without a change in altitude, the magnitude
of the G force can be held constant. However, in that case, you
cannot keep the vector pointed in the same direction.


If you want positive G through the normal vector when moving through
the inverted portion of a roll, you _must_ accelerate downward at at
least one G at some point, otherwise gravity will reduce G to zero and
make it negative. When the aircraft is inverted, gravity produces
-1.0 G of acceleration on the pilot. The only way to counter this is
to accelerate downward at at least 1 G.


I do think you didn't quite say what you meant when you stated you
cannot change altitude without changing G. What g force would you
expect it you were climbing at 500 feet a minute?None, but you would experience greater than 1 G as you started the

climb, and less than 1 G as you ended it. You have to accelerate
upward to start a climb and downward to stop it. You cannot
accelerate without inducing G forces. The same is true in turns.


--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -


  #2  
Old January 5th 07, 09:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default an exercise for sim pilots -- a 1 G roll

Tony writes:

Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical
physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis
yourself.


Acceleration is a change in velocity. Climbing from the ground (or
from any constant altitude) is a change in vertical velocity (since
the initial rate of climb is zero). Therefore climbing involves
acceleration. G forces are nothing more than acceleration. Therefore
climbing changes G forces. QED.

If you are not capable of the analytical physics you might have to do
experimental physics.


Nothing that complicated is required. See above.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #3  
Old January 5th 07, 10:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Danny Deger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default an exercise for sim pilots -- a 1 G roll


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Tony writes:

Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical
physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis
yourself.


Acceleration is a change in velocity. Climbing from the ground (or
from any constant altitude) is a change in vertical velocity (since
the initial rate of climb is zero). Therefore climbing involves
acceleration. G forces are nothing more than acceleration. Therefore
climbing changes G forces. QED.


You are correct, but for typical climbing and decending the amount of G away
from 1 is so small that as a pilot it is still "1". Entering a climb or a
decent moves a G meter such a small amount, you can't see the needle move
and you can't feel the small difference in the seat of your pants. There
are small G changes in a barrel roll, but not enough to really feel. As a
pilot, the manuever is called "1 G". Keep in mind this is in comparison
with other aerobatic manuevers that go to routinely 3 to 10 Gs.

Danny Deger


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 03 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 September 1st 03 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 August 1st 03 07:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.