![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The physics of this 1 g roll are nicely demonstrated at
http://www.stanford.edu/~siegman/one_g_roll.html The question I had asked in the first posting seems to have been answered by Kyle. This was almost as much fun as the airplane on a treadmill thread -- thanks everyone. Now there's an idea. Let's design a treadmill that follows the 1 g roll path and sell it to Disney! It wouldn't be much fun for the kids riding it, would it? ( I have one year from first public disclosure to file a patent application, right?) On Jan 5, 9:05 am, "Tony" wrote: On Jan 5, 6:51 am, Mxsmanic wrote: Tony writes: In fact you are wrong. You may wish to look in the archives of this newsgroup for the proof.The archives of this newsgroup are proof of nothing.Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis yourself. If you are not capable of the analytical physics you might have to do experimental physics. In your case if you have the skills those can be gamed. Or, remain ignorant, and wrong. Again. You cannot change altitude without acceleration, and that changes G force. You cannot execute any type of roll that involves any change in altitude without a change in G force. This is basic physics. If you roll the aircraft without a change in altitude, the magnitude of the G force can be held constant. However, in that case, you cannot keep the vector pointed in the same direction. If you want positive G through the normal vector when moving through the inverted portion of a roll, you _must_ accelerate downward at at least one G at some point, otherwise gravity will reduce G to zero and make it negative. When the aircraft is inverted, gravity produces -1.0 G of acceleration on the pilot. The only way to counter this is to accelerate downward at at least 1 G. I do think you didn't quite say what you meant when you stated you cannot change altitude without changing G. What g force would you expect it you were climbing at 500 feet a minute?None, but you would experience greater than 1 G as you started the climb, and less than 1 G as you ended it. You have to accelerate upward to start a climb and downward to stop it. You cannot accelerate without inducing G forces. The same is true in turns. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis yourself. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Climbing from the ground (or from any constant altitude) is a change in vertical velocity (since the initial rate of climb is zero). Therefore climbing involves acceleration. G forces are nothing more than acceleration. Therefore climbing changes G forces. QED. If you are not capable of the analytical physics you might have to do experimental physics. Nothing that complicated is required. See above. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Tony writes: Ah, but if you are capable of the task, you can apply some classical physics to the information provided in the archive and do the analysis yourself. Acceleration is a change in velocity. Climbing from the ground (or from any constant altitude) is a change in vertical velocity (since the initial rate of climb is zero). Therefore climbing involves acceleration. G forces are nothing more than acceleration. Therefore climbing changes G forces. QED. You are correct, but for typical climbing and decending the amount of G away from 1 is so small that as a pilot it is still "1". Entering a climb or a decent moves a G meter such a small amount, you can't see the needle move and you can't feel the small difference in the seat of your pants. There are small G changes in a barrel roll, but not enough to really feel. As a pilot, the manuever is called "1 G". Keep in mind this is in comparison with other aerobatic manuevers that go to routinely 3 to 10 Gs. Danny Deger |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |