![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buck Murdock wrote:
In article , Mxsmanic wrote: Ross writes: Nope, this was the real multi million $ American Airline simulator in Ft. Worth Texas at their training center. I do not suspect they you MSFS. Sometimes it can be surprising what runs on the back end. As someone who's been flying them every six months for a decade, and *instructing* in them for several years, it wouldn't be surprising at all. And as Mr. Space correctly points out, there's not so much as a snippet of Microsoft code running those $12 MM simulators. They run custom-designed simulator software, running on banks of computers. They can communicate with the actual, physical avionics that are the same as those installed in the aircraft. (Very, very different from painting graphics on what amounts to a matte painting that looks somewhat like a cockpit.) They also mimic the physical sensations, which are *critical* in coming anywhere close to completely simulating flight. I've played MSFS, I've spent hundreds of hours in full-motion simulators, and I've flown thousands of hours in transport aircraft. Until you have done more than one of the above, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED to make comparisons amongst them. AMEN And, it is Mr. Spade. ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buck Murdock writes:
Until you have done more than one of the above, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED to make comparisons amongst them. Qualifications on USENET are never certain. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Buck Murdock writes: Until you have done more than one of the above, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED to make comparisons amongst them. Qualifications on USENET are never certain. You think I am making up the knowledge I have about air carrier operations? You could learn from someone like me, instead you would rather be arrogant and defend your lack of knowledge as being what it is most certainly not. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sam Spade writes:
You think I am making up the knowledge I have about air carrier operations? I don't know. But I'm certain that many people make up many things on USENET, and I know better than to believe whatever I'm told. When someone tells me that most of the autoland-enabled aircraft are landing only at Class D airports, I start to wonder. You could learn from someone like me, instead you would rather be arrogant and defend your lack of knowledge as being what it is most certainly not. I see a lot of anomalies, and it makes me wary. See, despite what people claim, I _do_ consult other sources, and if they conflict with what people tell me here, it raises a lot of questions in my mind about who is correct. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Sam Spade writes: You think I am making up the knowledge I have about air carrier operations? I don't know. But I'm certain that many people make up many things on USENET, and I know better than to believe whatever I'm told. When someone tells me that most of the autoland-enabled aircraft are landing only at Class D airports, I start to wonder. You could learn from someone like me, instead you would rather be arrogant and defend your lack of knowledge as being what it is most certainly not. I see a lot of anomalies, and it makes me wary. See, despite what people claim, I _do_ consult other sources, and if they conflict with what people tell me here, it raises a lot of questions in my mind about who is correct. Good, go play with your other sources. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|