Sebring and Hitlaw

Juan,

For whatever it may be worth, I read that whole thread. You posted this
publicly, but did not explain the manner in which it relates to whatever may
be tormenting you. I see only a 5 plus year old version of what I am seeing
here now: Everybody insulting everybody, with you seeming to be at the
center. What am I missing here?

As an aside, I have read most of your posts regaring the Walton crash.
Somehow, "war hero" and "stupid" don't seem to go together, and I am sure
the surviving family would be distressed to see him referred to in this
manner. It also trivializes all of our military service, including yours.


"Juan Jimenez" wrote in message
.. .

"ChuckSlusaczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Juan Jimenez
says...
In other words, feeding the RAH gaggle the same thing it dishes out.
Can't
handle it? Get out of the kitchen.

You can ask for something you're not willing to give. Ask ChuckSteak
about
that, he knows exactly what I am talking about. So does Hitlaw.

And just exactly is what? All I know is you lied about Frank and his
credentials

Let me refresh your memory, boy.

This is what started it. You were shown it again several times. You have
admitted that you did in fact start it and you have refused, like a good
little ****ant coward that you are, to apologize, and now you whine like a
stuck pig everytime I forcefeed you your own crap with a ramrod several
times a month.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...be5e18d190b5c2

Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article , Juan Jimenez says...

Any more war heroes stupid enough to buy airplanes from you lately?

So now your saying John Walton is "stupid". I realize your tring to hurt me but
to attack the memory of a Class guy like John is beneath contempt.

I knew for a long time that you were a classless person but I found out recently
from postings on other sites that your also a racist and a bigot. Here's what
you posted:

"Better to send the white trash back to the European Ghettos and let the
hispanics fill the gap with people interested in working then whining"

White trash? Now I think we see the true picture of jaun jeminez and it isn't
pretty. Wonder what Pink Elephant will think?

Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret

"Remember the Alamo ...again"

On 19 Jan 2007 10:07:46 -0800, "olympusE1"
wrote:

...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert" can't find it, and my 16 year old
son, along with everyone else on this newsgroup who tries, can?

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

You're wrong, Mr. Jimenez, just like you were when we had the
discussion vis a vis filing for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 codes.
Hitlaw is in the database, and one can file for dissolution under
Chapter 7.

I'll spare you the chuckless, the lols, the lmaos and other
assorted snide remarks.

You forgot the mercy snips everytime someone else speaks the truth.

You are wrong. There is nothing bad about being wrong; what annoys me,
and 99.9999999 percent of the people on this newsgroup, is that you can
look at a blue sky, declare that it is pink, and then insult everyone
who has the temerity to insist that it is blue.

By the way, if you want to find Mr. Hitlaw in the database, DO NOT
input a country or a state; just his first and last name. The address,
which is not shown, is obviously in neither the US or Florida. After
you've done that, please come back online and apologize, or at the very
least, admit you were wrong.

Juan Jimenez wrote:
I checked that already, Alan.

FAA REGISTRY
Name Inquiry - List Results
Total Names found for HITLAW
in the country of UNITED STATES is 0

FAA REGISTRY
Name Inquiry - List Results
Total Names found for HITLAW
in the country of INDONESIA is 0

"olympusE1" wrote in message
oups.com...
yes, he is. check it again, Mr. Jimenez.

here's the link to the query page.

https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airm...ry/default.asp

you are wrong. let's see if you are adult enough to admit it.


Juan Jimenez wrote:
"olympusE1" wrote in message
ups.com...

...ummm, check your facts, Mr. Jimenez, or at least do a search of the
database you're quoting to ensure that what you are saying is remotely
accurate. Mr. Hitlaw is indeed on the FAA database, and has current
A&P and Senior Parachure Rigger (chest) certificates.

No, he's not. There is no Hitlaw in the database, either in the US or in
Indonesia.

As for yourself, are you the Juan Jimenez with the student ticket since
2000, or the Juan Carlos Jimenez who's had a Private ticket since 1987?

Neither. I have a private ticket, single and multiengine land, and I have
never been off the database.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...
...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert"

You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

....oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man
enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
"some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
irrelevance, but I will tell you this: One day you're going to annoy
the wrong person despite your "yo soy mas macho" nonsense here. Having
been within arms length of you on three occasions in the past 18
months, I can attest to this:

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
quotation of those figures is meant to impress, in my case you're
talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine
and dandy with me. Too, I know for a fact that at least one of the
people you regularly belittle here has a pair of postgraduate degrees
from a university that the pink elephants mention attending in THEIR
bios...)

So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
opinion.

With that, plonk!

Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.


Juan Jimenez wrote:
"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...
...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert"

You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...
...oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours.

Oh, bull****. I'm still waiting for you to have the balls to confront me at
OSH like you said you would, years ago. Shut up and go back to your high
chair, boy.

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
under contract according to your website.

Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with networks.


BTW, why do you have images on your "web site" from companies who fired you?
Isn't that unethical?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

I love the small print at the bottom of the Certificate..."The ITIL
certification scheme is officially supported by" ... SCHEME...I LOVE IT!

What IS I.T.? Last time I checked IT had to do with Information
Technology (specifically, the exchange of information between
computers). Computers exchange information over networks. How can you
get a Manager's Certificate in IT Service Management without knowing
networking?

I'm attending the University of Wisconsin and am close to graduating
with a Bachelor's in Information and Communications Technology. They
also offer a degree in Information Technology Management (which sounds
like your certificate). Here is a snippet from that course of study:


"The technical curriculum in the telecommunication area focuses on
contemporary methods of analysis, design, and telecommunication systems
solutions. Technical courses are delivered in areas including telephony,
networking, telecommunication policy and regulation, administration,
video, imaging, and multimedia. Students completing this program will
earn these highly respected certifications: Cisco CCNA and CCDA and one
or more of the following: Cisco CCNP and Cisco CCDP."

Hmmm...involves NETWORKING.

Scott




Juan Jimenez wrote:



Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with networks.

Close to graduating with a degree in ICT and doesn't know the difference
between systems management and service management, and has not been
introduced to ITIL or its ITSM component, the defacto worldwide standard for
_service_ management, which has nothing to do with managing networks. That's
about par for what universities put out these days as an excuse for
graduates. You should be asking for a refund.

Educate yourself, kiddo. Trust me when I tell you it would behoove you to be
aware of a service management framework on which IBM, HP, Microsoft and many
other worldwide companies base their service management methodologies. If
you don't think this is important, go to monster.com, enter ITIL as a search
term and watch what comes out. As of right no less than 866 job posting
mention it and/or require it. Top it off with the fact that the federal
government will soon require it as a prerequisite to doing business (on the
basis of ISO 20000) and maybe you'll get the picture.

http://www.itil.co.uk

Juan

"Scott" wrote in message
.. .
I love the small print at the bottom of the Certificate..."The ITIL
certification scheme is officially supported by" ... SCHEME...I LOVE IT!

What IS I.T.? Last time I checked IT had to do with Information
Technology (specifically, the exchange of information between computers).
Computers exchange information over networks. How can you get a Manager's
Certificate in IT Service Management without knowing networking?

I'm attending the University of Wisconsin and am close to graduating with
a Bachelor's in Information and Communications Technology. They also
offer a degree in Information Technology Management (which sounds like
your certificate). Here is a snippet from that course of study:


"The technical curriculum in the telecommunication area focuses on
contemporary methods of analysis, design, and telecommunication systems
solutions. Technical courses are delivered in areas including telephony,
networking, telecommunication policy and regulation, administration,
video, imaging, and multimedia. Students completing this program will earn
these highly respected certifications: Cisco CCNA and CCDA and one or more
of the following: Cisco CCNP and Cisco CCDP."

Hmmm...involves NETWORKING.

Scott




Juan Jimenez wrote:



Your reading skills suck. The certification has nothing to do with
networks.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

....oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man
enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
"some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
irrelevance, but I will tell you this: One day you're going to annoy
the wrong person despite your "yo soy mas macho" nonsense here. Having
been within arms length of you on three occasions in the past 18
months, I can attest to this:

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
quotation of those figures is meant to impress, in my case you're
talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine
and dandy with me. Too, I know for a fact that at least one of the
people you regularly belittle here has a pair of postgraduate degrees
from a university that the pink elephants mention attending in THEIR
bios...)

So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
opinion.

With that, plonk!

Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.


Juan Jimenez wrote:
"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...
...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert"

You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Well, Jaun has most clearly won another convert. Seems you have summed
up in one post that which is Jaun and how the majority (if not all) of
the participants in RAH feel about him. Well Said!

I did love your point about his "Certified Computer Network Expert"
boast. Seems Jaun has this need to constantly try to impress with his
self proclaimed "accomplishments". He somehow thinks that he has done
so much more than anyone else simply because others find no need to try
and impress everyone with what they have done. My experience has been
that those who shout the loudest about what they have done and what
their qualifications are have the least to boast about.

olympusE1 wrote:
...oh I don't think you care, Mr. Jimenez... my threshold for
self-delusion is far below yours. You obviously don't care about
anyone or anything, other than the sound of your own voice and the
clacking of your keyboard. What I do think is that you're neither man
enough nor mature enough, despite your advancing years, to admit when
you're wrong; your latest retort is yet another descent into nonsense
where you babble on about how the name in the FAA database must be
"some other Frank Hitlaw." Your insatiable need to annoy people is
beyond belief, and THAT, Mr. Jimenez is what I define as a bad idea.
What you think of that definition is, in itself, the definition of
irrelevance, but I will tell you this: One day you're going to annoy
the wrong person despite your "yo soy mas macho" nonsense here. Having
been within arms length of you on three occasions in the past 18
months, I can attest to this:

And as for "Certified Computer Network Expert" I got that from YOUR BD5
website. You've spent "320 hours of study and 800 pages of reading" to
have achieved the certification from the firm for which you now lecture
under contract according to your website. (While I know that your
quotation of those figures is meant to impress, in my case you're
talking/typing to someone who goes through a couple thousand pages of
manuals every time the rat *******s at Adobe come out with another
version of Photoshop. My "certificates" for wading through those
tomes, though, have "pay to the order of" on them, and that's just fine
and dandy with me. Too, I know for a fact that at least one of the
people you regularly belittle here has a pair of postgraduate degrees
from a university that the pink elephants mention attending in THEIR
bios...)

So there you go, Mr. Jimenez: We have to agree to disagree. It is my
opinion that you are a rude, petulant, self-centered and self-absorbed
overweight child, and I imagine that you would disagree with that
opinion.

With that, plonk!

Off you and your opinions, and your excuses, and your snide remarks,
and most especially your childish emoticons go into the trash bin.


Juan Jimenez wrote:
"olympusE1" wrote in message
ps.com...
...if you have indeed "checked that already" then why is it that you, a
"Certified Computer Network expert"

You must be thinking of the wrong person, or else you're making the common
mistake of parroting what other RAH gagglers say, Alan. Bad idea.

I'm sorry, but I just don't believe you.

Well, then you're making yet another common mistakes, that of thinking I
care.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com