![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, but it'll still count towards the 250 hours of "flight time", you
only need 100 of PIC. 61.129 - Aeronautical experience. (a) For an airplane single-engine rating. Except as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, a person who applies for a commercial pilot certificate with an airplane category and single-engine class rating must log at least 250 hours of flight time as a pilot that consists of at least: (1) 100 hours in powered aircraft, of which 50 hours must be in airplanes. (2) 100 hours of pilot-in-command flight time, which includes at least -- .... On Jan 23, 6:14 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On 23 Jan 2007 12:50:00 -0800, "kevmor" wrote: Hmm... but then doesn't that seem kind of far fetched if you decide before takeoff the safety pilot will be PIC, then the other person wears the hood for .3 hours, the safety pilot can log the entire flight, maybe 5 hours, as towards their total time? I wonder if any examiner would question logging that much time? I could say, "hey, wear this for a few minutes", then we both log the total time.You may be logging the entire flight as total flight time. However, the only time that "counts" for your commercial is that time that is logged as PIC time. In your scenario, you would log total flight time as 5 hours; but PIC time is 0.3 hours. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen
wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Are you sure about logging the second in command time? 61.51 says: .... (f) Logging second-in-command time. A person may log second-in-command flight time only for that flight time during which that person: (1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of Sec. 61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or (2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted. In both cases, it seems to require that the time be in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate. That isn't the case in any of the aircraft I fly as safety pilot, so, I'd say if you are not PIC, you can't log the time as SIC. Maybe you can log it as something else? Brad |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/28/07 15:58, bsalai wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Are you sure about logging the second in command time? 61.51 says: ... (f) Logging second-in-command time. A person may log second-in-command flight time only for that flight time during which that person: (1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of Sec. 61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or (2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted. In both cases, it seems to require that the time be in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate. No. In number 2 above, it says: "... required under the type certificate of the aircraft *or* the regulations under which the flight..." When the pilot flying is wearing a view limiting device, the regulations require that the safety pilot be present. That isn't the case in any of the aircraft I fly as safety pilot, so, I'd say if you are not PIC, you can't log the time as SIC. Maybe you can log it as something else? Brad -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:58:32 -0500, bsalai wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:16 -0800, Mark Hansen wrote: But ... and I hadn't considered this until now... you would still log the entire flight time as "total flight time" even though the amount of time logged under PIC, SIC or both is less than the total. That's what I thought I had written. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Are you sure about logging the second in command time? YES 61.51 says: ... (f) Logging second-in-command time. A person may log second-in-command flight time only for that flight time during which that person: (1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of Sec. 61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or (2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted. In both cases, it seems to require that the time be in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate. That isn't the case in any of the aircraft I fly as safety pilot, so, I'd say if you are not PIC, you can't log the time as SIC. Maybe you can log it as something else? Brad Reread 61.51(f)(2) carefully: "...more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft ***or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted***. 91.109(b)(1) is the regulation that *requires* a safety pilot when the pilot flying is operating the aircraft in simulated instrument flight. Hence "the regulations under which the flight is being conducted" requires more than one pilot. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |