![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Rosenfeld wrote: I've not flown extensively in mountainous areas. Are there really many airways with MEA's below the minimum 91.177 IFR altitudes for flight? Or are you saying that ATC would not grant the clearance because of radar coverage/MIA/MVA issues? We have lots of airways whose MEA's are well below the peaks of the mountains, 4-5000 feet below. A lot of airways zig zag to get into the low areas or passes between mountains. Some just go right over the top. As for OTP we don't care about radar coverage. We use OTP everyday here, more in the winter than the summer. We don't care what altitude you go at. MVA/MIA is also irrelavant for OTP ops. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:46:49 -0700, Newps wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: I've not flown extensively in mountainous areas. Are there really many airways with MEA's below the minimum 91.177 IFR altitudes for flight? Or are you saying that ATC would not grant the clearance because of radar coverage/MIA/MVA issues? We have lots of airways whose MEA's are well below the peaks of the mountains, 4-5000 feet below. A lot of airways zig zag to get into the low areas or passes between mountains. Some just go right over the top. As for OTP we don't care about radar coverage. We use OTP everyday here, more in the winter than the summer. We don't care what altitude you go at. MVA/MIA is also irrelavant for OTP ops. That's what I thought. When you write about airways below the peaks -- obviously there are many of those. But what I wondered, specifically, if there were MEA's lower than the 91.177 minimum required IFR altitude (2,000' above the highest obstruction within four miles of your flight path). So far as the requiremnt (for pilots) for VFR altitudes, that would only apply at 3000' or more AGL. So would probably not be applicable here. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
Ron Rosenfeld wrote: I've not flown extensively in mountainous areas. Are there really many airways with MEA's below the minimum 91.177 IFR altitudes for flight? Or are you saying that ATC would not grant the clearance because of radar coverage/MIA/MVA issues? We have lots of airways whose MEA's are well below the peaks of the mountains, 4-5000 feet below. A lot of airways zig zag to get into the low areas or passes between mountains. Some just go right over the top. As for OTP we don't care about radar coverage. We use OTP everyday here, more in the winter than the summer. We don't care what altitude you go at. MVA/MIA is also irrelavant for OTP ops. You may not care, but that doesn't change the position of FAA headquarters (note "minimum IFR altitudes in No 3). From the AIM: e. When operating in VFR conditions with an ATC authorization to “maintain VFR-on-top/maintain VFR conditions” pilots on IFR flight plans must: 1. Fly at the appropriate VFR altitude as prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.159. 2. Comply with the VFR visibility and distance from cloud criteria in 14 CFR Section 91.155 (Basic VFR Weather Minimums). 3. Comply with instrument flight rules that are applicable to this flight; i.e., minimum IFR altitudes, position reporting, radio communications, course to be flown, adherence to ATC clearance, etc. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aztec Lower Cowl Mod STC | Jim Burns | Owning | 3 | April 16th 06 03:21 PM |
Cherokee Strut Lower Strut Seal Replacement Report | Mike Spera | Owning | 3 | July 23rd 05 07:07 PM |
Orca Island, WA | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 11 | June 5th 04 04:38 PM |
Flight planning at the lower flight levels | Peter R. | Piloting | 2 | March 16th 04 02:39 AM |
Question about Rear Admiral, lower half | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 28 | October 5th 03 11:24 PM |