![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" writes:
That is not an option for all the other airplanes or ATC. Yes, it is, when an emergency exists. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news ![]() I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, multiple runways. It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal separation in one minute. You don't understand how ATC works. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I have a pretty good understanding.
I do know that no controller from any facility with traffic like DFW has responded. So, if there is a DFW or ATL or ORD, LAX or SFO controller out there, how long would it take to clear the required airspace v. just fitting the emergency into the traffic. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news ![]() | I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace | around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, | multiple runways. | | It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the | airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal | separation in one minute. | | | You don't understand how ATC works. | | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... I think I have a pretty good understanding. Yes, but you don't actually have a good understanding. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" writes:
I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, multiple runways. No matter what the complexity, it only takes a few minutes to clear a path. It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal separation in one minute. Show me the transcripts and radar traces, so that I can see how long it actually takes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace around DFW, Ok, I'll be blunt: I don't think you understand you have been answered here by controllers who know EXACTLY what that kind of emergency would mean to operations at DFW. And they have told you repeatedly that it is a non-issue. Why do you continue to insist otherwise? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because I think they are wrong and they have not said just
how they would have "cleared the airspace" in less time than was available to allow the straight in approach and landing? The controllers knew the position of each airplane and they also knew the time for a straight in approach. They knew that it would be quicker the way it was done, not the way the PIC wanted in a "panics" state of mind. The plane did not flame-out, there were no mid-airs, and nobody died or was injured. I would bet my lottery winnings from last night [did not win] that the re-training ATC got was to include statements of their rationalizations about traffic and flight times "on the tape." "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... | Jim, | | I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace | around DFW, | | | Ok, I'll be blunt: I don't think you understand you have been answered | here by controllers who know EXACTLY what that kind of emergency would | mean to operations at DFW. And they have told you repeatedly that it is | a non-issue. Why do you continue to insist otherwise? | | -- | Thomas Borchert (EDDH) | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... Because I think they are wrong and they have not said just how they would have "cleared the airspace" in less time than was available to allow the straight in approach and landing? So because you have no idea how it can be done you concluded it can't be done. It's been stated here the airplane was about 80 miles from DFW, I don't know if that's correct but nobody has disputed it so we'll assume it is. We know it was being worked by center so it sounds about right. So figure at least 15 minutes from touchdown, that's a lot of time. Most of the arriving aircraft already within approach control airspace, perhaps all of them, can get on the ground before the emergency arrives. Other DFW bound aircraft will be held at arrival fixes or enroute. A flow control message will be sent to stop departures to DFW from at least the closer airports. Most of the departure aircraft that have already taxied will be able to depart before the emergency arrives, those that haven't taxied will be held on the ramp. Traffic at satellite fields will be largely unaffected. It certainly isn't necessary to "turn the airport around" or sterilize the airspace. What made you think it was? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in
news ![]() I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, multiple runways. It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal separation in one minute. Oh, come on! Didn't you see "Pushing Tin"? ![]() Seriously, though, based on the "10 miles north of Bonham" that was described in the WFAA report (assuming that was accurate), the emergency was called about 70 NM out. At 450 Kts, that's about 10 minutes before the plane is within range. And presumably, once they get below 10,000', they'll slow down to 250 Kts allowing even more time. Plenty of time to vector even dozens of planes out of the way safely. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If those distances are correct, yes ATC did not do what it
should have done. But , do all controllers have hot wives who screw around? "Judah" wrote in message . .. | "Jim Macklin" wrote in | news ![]() | I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace | around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors, | multiple runways. | | It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the | airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal | separation in one minute. | | Oh, come on! Didn't you see "Pushing Tin"? | | ![]() | | Seriously, though, based on the "10 miles north of Bonham" that was described | in the WFAA report (assuming that was accurate), the emergency was called | about 70 NM out. | | At 450 Kts, that's about 10 minutes before the plane is within range. And | presumably, once they get below 10,000', they'll slow down to 250 Kts | allowing even more time. | | Plenty of time to vector even dozens of planes out of the way safely. | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fuel leak or auxiliary fuel pump malfunction? | [email protected] | Owning | 7 | December 17th 06 12:57 PM |
Fuel quality control standards for aircraft rental/fuel sales... | [email protected] | Owning | 19 | January 19th 05 04:12 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve | Bill Berle | Owning | 0 | January 26th 04 07:48 AM |