A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Low fuel emergency in DFW



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 25th 07, 02:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

"Jim Macklin" writes:

That is not an option for all the other airplanes or ATC.


Yes, it is, when an emergency exists.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old February 24th 07, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news

I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
multiple runways.

It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the
airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


You don't understand how ATC works.


  #3  
Old February 25th 07, 02:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

I think I have a pretty good understanding.

I do know that no controller from any facility with traffic
like DFW has responded. So, if there is a DFW or ATL or
ORD, LAX or SFO controller out there, how long would it take
to clear the required airspace v. just fitting the emergency
into the traffic.






"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
message
nk.net...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news |
| I don't think you understand the complexity of the
airspace
| around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
| multiple runways.
|
| It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear
the
| airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
| separation in one minute.
|
|
| You don't understand how ATC works.
|
|


  #4  
Old February 25th 07, 03:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
...

I think I have a pretty good understanding.


Yes, but you don't actually have a good understanding.


  #5  
Old February 25th 07, 02:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

"Jim Macklin" writes:

I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
multiple runways.


No matter what the complexity, it only takes a few minutes to clear a path.

It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the
airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


Show me the transcripts and radar traces, so that I can see how long it
actually takes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old February 25th 07, 09:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,749
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

Jim,

I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW,


Ok, I'll be blunt: I don't think you understand you have been answered
here by controllers who know EXACTLY what that kind of emergency would
mean to operations at DFW. And they have told you repeatedly that it is
a non-issue. Why do you continue to insist otherwise?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #7  
Old February 25th 07, 01:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

Because I think they are wrong and they have not said just
how they would have "cleared the airspace" in less time than
was available to allow the straight in approach and landing?

The controllers knew the position of each airplane and they
also knew the time for a straight in approach. They knew
that it would be quicker the way it was done, not the way
the PIC wanted in a "panics" state of mind.

The plane did not flame-out, there were no mid-airs, and
nobody died or was injured.

I would bet my lottery winnings from last night [did not
win] that the re-training ATC got was to include statements
of their rationalizations about traffic and flight times "on
the tape."



"Thomas Borchert" wrote in
message ...
| Jim,
|
| I don't think you understand the complexity of the
airspace
| around DFW,
|
|
| Ok, I'll be blunt: I don't think you understand you have
been answered
| here by controllers who know EXACTLY what that kind of
emergency would
| mean to operations at DFW. And they have told you
repeatedly that it is
| a non-issue. Why do you continue to insist otherwise?
|
| --
| Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
|


  #8  
Old February 25th 07, 03:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,477
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
...

Because I think they are wrong and they have not said just
how they would have "cleared the airspace" in less time than
was available to allow the straight in approach and landing?


So because you have no idea how it can be done you concluded it can't be
done.

It's been stated here the airplane was about 80 miles from DFW, I don't know
if that's correct but nobody has disputed it so we'll assume it is. We know
it was being worked by center so it sounds about right. So figure at least
15 minutes from touchdown, that's a lot of time. Most of the arriving
aircraft already within approach control airspace, perhaps all of them, can
get on the ground before the emergency arrives. Other DFW bound aircraft
will be held at arrival fixes or enroute. A flow control message will be
sent to stop departures to DFW from at least the closer airports. Most of
the departure aircraft that have already taxied will be able to depart
before the emergency arrives, those that haven't taxied will be held on the
ramp. Traffic at satellite fields will be largely unaffected. It certainly
isn't necessary to "turn the airport around" or sterilize the airspace.
What made you think it was?


  #9  
Old February 25th 07, 03:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

"Jim Macklin" wrote in
news
I don't think you understand the complexity of the airspace
around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
multiple runways.

It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear the
airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
separation in one minute.


Oh, come on! Didn't you see "Pushing Tin"?



Seriously, though, based on the "10 miles north of Bonham" that was described
in the WFAA report (assuming that was accurate), the emergency was called
about 70 NM out.

At 450 Kts, that's about 10 minutes before the plane is within range. And
presumably, once they get below 10,000', they'll slow down to 250 Kts
allowing even more time.

Plenty of time to vector even dozens of planes out of the way safely.

  #10  
Old February 25th 07, 04:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Low fuel emergency in DFW

If those distances are correct, yes ATC did not do what it
should have done. But , do all controllers have hot wives
who screw around?


"Judah" wrote in message
. ..
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in
| news |
| I don't think you understand the complexity of the
airspace
| around DFW, with arrival gates, departure corridors,
| multiple runways.
|
| It is not a 1 minute or a two minute exercise to "clear
the
| airspace" neither does a 10° heading change create legal
| separation in one minute.
|
| Oh, come on! Didn't you see "Pushing Tin"?
|
|
|
| Seriously, though, based on the "10 miles north of Bonham"
that was described
| in the WFAA report (assuming that was accurate), the
emergency was called
| about 70 NM out.
|
| At 450 Kts, that's about 10 minutes before the plane is
within range. And
| presumably, once they get below 10,000', they'll slow down
to 250 Kts
| allowing even more time.
|
| Plenty of time to vector even dozens of planes out of the
way safely.
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fuel leak or auxiliary fuel pump malfunction? [email protected] Owning 7 December 17th 06 12:57 PM
Fuel quality control standards for aircraft rental/fuel sales... [email protected] Owning 19 January 19th 05 04:12 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Home Built 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM
Airplane Parts on Ebay Vac Reg Valves, Fuel Floats, O-200 Spider, Fuel Injection Valve Bill Berle Owning 0 January 26th 04 07:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.